IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7854-d593927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction Cost and Carbon Emission Assessment of a Highway Construction—A Case towards Sustainable Transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenkai Luo

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
    School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Malindu Sandanayake

    (College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia)

  • Guomin Zhang

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

  • Yongtao Tan

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia)

Abstract

Due to its dynamic nature in construction, benchmarking environmental emissions of road construction projects can be a daunting task. Often stakeholders will have to prioritize the economic and environmental indicators based on the project objectives. The study presents a methodological framework to compare economic and environmental impacts to benchmark sustainable transport construction projects. Through findings, the study aims to inform focus areas and key stages of infrastructure projects to benchmark sustainable performance. Process-based emission and cost estimation models are presented with an AHP based weighting factor that enables prioritization of emissions and costs based on project scopes and objectives. Using a case study, results are represented to validate the framework and methodology. Concrete and steel are identified as the main materials that contribute to total carbon emissions, while soil and gravel are responsible for the highest costs. Electricity consumption is discovered as the major fuel type contributing to carbon emissions. Concrete and dump trucks are discovered as the top two sources of emissions and costs, respectively. Scenario analyses revealed that the choice of equipment significantly affects the project’s emissions and costs. The application of sustainable materials can significantly reduce emissions and cost. The use of the case study approach results in a lack of generalizability. However, the same methodology and process can be adopted for the sustainable benchmarking of different projects. Researchers are encouraged to investigate processes to automate sustainable benchmarking of transport infrastructure construction projects. The study is one of the first attempts to compare cost and environmental impacts using a systematic methodology of transportation infrastructure construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenkai Luo & Malindu Sandanayake & Guomin Zhang & Yongtao Tan, 2021. "Construction Cost and Carbon Emission Assessment of a Highway Construction—A Case towards Sustainable Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7854-:d:593927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Fregonara & Roberto Giordano & Diana Rolando & Jean-Marc Tulliani, 2016. "Integrating Environmental and Economic Sustainability in New Building Construction and Retrofits," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 3-28, October.
    2. Mohamed Marzouk & Eslam Mohammed Abdelkader & Mohamed El-zayat & Ahmed Aboushady, 2017. "Assessing Environmental Impact Indicators in Road Construction Projects in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Malindu Sandanayake & Guomin Zhang & Sujeeva Setunge & Chris Malcolm Thomas, 2015. "Environmental Emissions of Construction Equipment Usage in Pile Foundation Construction Process—A Case Study," Springer Books, in: Liyin Shen & Kunhui Ye & Chao Mao (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 327-339, Springer.
    4. Zuo, Jian & Pullen, Stephen & Rameezdeen, Raufdeen & Bennetts, Helen & Wang, Yuan & Mao, Guozhu & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Duan, Huabo, 2017. "Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 358-368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhichao Ma & Jie Zhang & Huanhuan Wang & Shaochan Gao, 2023. "Optimization of Sustainable Bi-Objective Cold-Chain Logistics Route Considering Carbon Emissions and Customers’ Immediate Demands in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Malindu Sandanayake & Le Li & Junhai Zhao & Paul Joseph, 2022. "Applications of Solar Panel Waste in Pavement Construction—An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Rakhyun & Tae, Sungho & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Development of low carbon durability design for green apartment buildings in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 263-272.
    2. Xue Xiao & Martin Skitmore & Heng Li & Bo Xia, 2019. "Mapping Knowledge in the Economic Areas of Green Building Using Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Wang, Zhaohua & Liu, Qiang & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "What kinds of building energy-saving retrofit projects should be preferred? Efficiency evaluation with three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Li, Qianwen & Qian, Tingyu & Zhang, Xufeng & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Huang, Han & Liu, Lei & Zhu, Licai & Jiang, Huikang & Zhu, Hanyi, 2023. "How does stakeholder loss aversion affect the promotion of green housing?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 647-668.
    5. Penghui Wen & Chaohui Wang & Liang Song & Liangliang Niu & Haoyu Chen, 2021. "Durability and Sustainability of Cement-Stabilized Materials Based on Utilization of Waste Materials: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Hernán Darío Cañola & Yesenia Pérez & Gersson F. B. Sandoval & Edna Possan & Gabriela Pitolli Lyra, 2025. "Incorporating Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) in Art and Small-Scale Architectural Elements: A Sustainable Disposal Alternative," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1107-1136, April.
    7. Roberto Giordano & Federica Gallina & Benedetta Quaglio, 2021. "Analysis and Assessment of the Building Life Cycle. Indicators and Tools for the Early Design Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Cristina Coscia & Giulia Lazzari & Irene Rubino, 2018. "Values, Memory, and the Role of Exploratory Methods for Policy-Design Processes and the Sustainable Redevelopment of Waterfront Contexts: The Case of Officine Piaggio (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Xiaojing Zhao & Tengyuan Chang & Bon-Gang Hwang & Xiaopeng Deng, 2017. "Critical Factors Influencing Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Andrew Ikingura & Anna M. Grabiec & Bartosz Radomski, 2025. "Examining Key Barriers and Relevant Promotion Strategies of Green Buildings Adoption in Tanzania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Daniele Dabbene & Carla Bartolozzi & Cristina Coscia, 2022. "How to Monitor and Evaluate Quality in Adaptive Heritage Reuse Projects from a Well-Being Perspective: A Proposal for a Dashboard Model of Indicators to Support Promoters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-32, June.
    12. Giampiero Trunzo & Laura Moretti & Antonio D’Andrea, 2019. "Life Cycle Analysis of Road Construction and Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Anik Gupta & Carlos J. Slebi-Acevedo & Esther Lizasoain-Arteaga & Jorge Rodriguez-Hernandez & Daniel Castro-Fresno, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Selection of Additives in Porous Asphalt Mixtures Using Mechanical, Hydraulic, Economic, and Environmental Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Walaa S. E. Ismaeel & Marwa Adel Elsayed, 2018. "The Interplay of Environmental Assessment Methods; Characterising the Institutional Background in Egypt," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Fahlstedt, Oskar & Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka & Huang, Lizhen & Bohne, Rolf André, 2024. "Building renovations and life cycle assessment - A scoping literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Venkatraj, V. & Dixit, M.K., 2021. "Life cycle embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings: A comparison between different LCI methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Geng, Shengnan & Wang, Yuan & Zuo, Jian & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Mao, Guozhu, 2017. "Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 176-184.
    18. Maciej Dzikuć & Arkadiusz Piwowar & Szymon Szufa & Janusz Adamczyk & Maria Dzikuć, 2021. "Potential and Scenarios of Variants of Thermo-Modernization of Single-Family Houses: An Example of the Lubuskie Voivodeship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.
    19. Du, Qiang & Han, Xiao & Li, Yi & Li, Zhe & Xia, Bo & Guo, Xiqian, 2021. "The energy rebound effect of residential buildings: Evidence from urban and rural areas in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    20. Gui, Xuechen & Gou, Zhonghua, 2021. "Understanding green building energy performance in the context of commercial estates: A multi-year and cross-region analysis using the Australian commercial building disclosure database," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7854-:d:593927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.