Author
Listed:
- Hernán Darío Cañola
(Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia)
- Yesenia Pérez
(Institución Universitaria Colegio Mayor de Antioquia)
- Gersson F. B. Sandoval
(Universidad Católica del Norte)
- Edna Possan
(Universidad Federal de Integración Latinoamericana (Brasil))
- Gabriela Pitolli Lyra
(Universidade de São Paulo (USP))
Abstract
The construction industry stands out among sectors with the highest waste production, showing a substantial potential for reuse considering the high consumption of raw materials and CO2 production. However, this reuse has been constrained by the high variability and potential impacts on structural materials, thus leaving the possibility of incorporating these materials into more architecturally oriented applications open. In this context, this study aims to determine the technical and environmental feasibility of reusing construction and demolition waste (CDW) in mortar production to create art and small-scale architectural elements (SSAE) for non-structural applications. The approach is grounded in circular economy principles, emphasizing aesthetic enhancement and adding value to the waste management chain. The research was conducted in three stages. First, construction waste (concrete and cement mortars) was collected, treated, and characterized in terms of granulometry, density, organic impurities, absorption, and specific mass. In the second stage, mortars with 75% replacement of natural sand by CDW were produced and evaluated for their physical and mechanical properties, including absorption, pH, density, color saturation, compressive strength, and dynamic elasticity modulus. Finally, art and microarchitecture elements were created, with assessments on their technical properties, aesthetic aspects, and an additional Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate environmental performance. The results demonstrate that CDW can be effectively repurposed to produce a variety of art and microarchitecture elements, offering a sustainable and economically viable alternative for waste disposal while enhancing aesthetic value. The life cycle assessment showed that the R 2.5 mortar had the best environmental performance in 11 environmental categories out of the 19 analyzed, while the reference mortar and R 5 had the worst performance in 10 and 9 categories, respectively. Replacing sand with CDW generally improved outcomes, but adding iron oxide pigments increased environmental impacts. Mortars with lower density had the least negative impacts. The use of CDW in art and microarchitecture production presents a viable alternative to disposal, promoting a circular economy and providing lower negative environmental impacts.
Suggested Citation
Hernán Darío Cañola & Yesenia Pérez & Gersson F. B. Sandoval & Edna Possan & Gabriela Pitolli Lyra, 2025.
"Incorporating Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) in Art and Small-Scale Architectural Elements: A Sustainable Disposal Alternative,"
Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1107-1136, April.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:circec:v:5:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00482-3
DOI: 10.1007/s43615-024-00482-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:5:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s43615-024-00482-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.