IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5472-d554152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indicators and Framework for Measuring Industrial Sustainability in Italian Footwear Small and Medium Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Azemeraw Tadesse Mengistu

    (Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, 36100 Vicenza, Italy)

  • Roberto Panizzolo

    (Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, 36100 Vicenza, Italy)

Abstract

As small and medium enterprises (SMEs) have limited resources, they need a manageable number of indicators that are simple and easy to use for measuring sustainability performance. However, the lack of suitable indicators tailored to industry needs, particularly for SMEs, has been a major challenge in measuring and managing industrial sustainability. Our study aims to empirically analyze and select the useful and applicable indicators to measure sustainability performance in Italian footwear SMEs. To achieve this objective, we proposed a methodological approach to identify, analyze and select sustainability indicators. First, we carried out a systematic review to identify potential sustainability indicators from the literature. Then, we developed a questionnaire based on the identified indicators and pre-tested it with selected industrial experts, scholars, and researchers to further refine the indicators before collecting data. We applied the fuzzy Delphi method to analyze and select the final indicators. Based on a sample of 48 Italian footwear SMEs, the results of our study show that product quality, material consumption, and customer satisfaction were the top priorities among the selected indicators for measuring the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of industrial sustainability, respectively. The selected indicators stressed the measuring of industrial sustainability performance associated with financial benefits, costs, market competitiveness, resources, customers, employees, and the community. Our study proposed a framework that helps to apply the selected indicators for measuring sustainability performance in SMEs. Finally, our study contributes to the existing theory and knowledge of industrial sustainability performance measurement by providing indicators supported by empirical evidence and a framework to put the indicators into practice in the context of SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Azemeraw Tadesse Mengistu & Roberto Panizzolo, 2021. "Indicators and Framework for Measuring Industrial Sustainability in Italian Footwear Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5472-:d:554152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anastasiia Moldavska & Torgeir Welo, 2018. "Testing and Verification of a New Corporate Sustainability Assessment Method for Manufacturing: A Multiple Case Research Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-40, November.
    2. Scott, Allen J., 2006. "The Changing Global Geography of Low-Technology, Labor-Intensive Industry: Clothing, Footwear, and Furniture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1517-1536, September.
    3. Edward Kassem & Oldrich Trenz, 2020. "Automated Sustainability Assessment System for Small and Medium Enterprises Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Sujit Singh & Ezutah Udoncy Olugu & Siti Nurmaya Musa & Abu Bakar Mahat, 2018. "Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel, 2020. "Sustainable development in Asian manufacturing SMEs: Progress and directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Aleksandar Subic & Bahman Shabani & Mehdi Hedayati & Enda Crossin, 2013. "Performance Analysis of the Capability Assessment Tool for Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Zhengyi Song & Young Moon, 2019. "Sustainability metrics for assessing manufacturing systems: a distance-to-target methodology," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2811-2834, December.
    8. Melissa Demartini & Claudia Pinna & Bahar Aliakbarian & Flavio Tonelli & Sergio Terzi, 2018. "Soft Drink Supply Chain Sustainability: A Case Based Approach to Identify and Explain Best Practices and Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Gianluca Vitale & Sebastiano Cupertino & Loredana Rinaldi & Angelo Riccaboni, 2019. "Integrated Management Approach Towards Sustainability: An Egyptian Business Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Shamraiz Ahmad & Kuan Yew Wong & Babar Zaman, 2019. "A Comprehensive and Integrated Stochastic-Fuzzy Method for Sustainability Assessment in the Malaysian Food Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Hao-Chang Tsai & An-Sheng Lee & Huang-Ning Lee & Chien-Nan Chen & Yu-Chun Liu, 2020. "An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP on the Discussion of Training Indicators for the Regional Competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the Trade of Joinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Flavio Tonelli & Steve Evans & Paolo Taticchi, 2013. "Industrial sustainability: challenges, perspectives, actions," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 143-163.
    13. Valentin Grecu & Radu-Ilie-Gabriel Ciobotea & Adrian Florea, 2020. "Software Application for Organizational Sustainability Performance Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Said Yousef Dwikat & Darwina Arshad & Mohd Noor Mohd Shariff, 2023. "Effect of Competent Human Capital, Strategic Flexibility and Turbulent Environment on Sustainable Performance of SMEs in Manufacturing Industries in Palestine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Antonio Francisco Roldán López de Hierro & Miguel Sánchez & Daniel Puente-Fernández & Rafael Montoya-Juárez & Concepción Roldán, 2021. "A Fuzzy Delphi Consensus Methodology Based on a Fuzzy Ranking," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Said Yousef Dwikat & Darwina Arshad & Mohd Noor Mohd Shariff, 2022. "The Influence of Systematic Strategic Planning and Strategic Business Innovation on the Sustainable Performance of Manufacturing SMEs: The Case of Palestine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azemeraw Tadesse Mengistu & Roberto Panizzolo, 2023. "Analysis of indicators used for measuring industrial sustainability: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1979-2005, March.
    2. Taryn Renatta De Mendonca & Yan Zhou, 2019. "Environmental Performance, Customer Satisfaction, and Profitability: A Study among Large U.S. Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Sohyun Park & Keumsook Lee, 2021. "Examining the Impact of E-Commerce Growth on the Spatial Distribution of Fashion and Beauty Stores in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Dmytro Liudvenko, 2020. "Information Needs of an Environmentally Conscious Society regarding the Functioning of Animal Husbandry Enterprises," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 22-29, December.
    5. Silviu Nate & Yuriy Bilan & Mariia Kurylo & Olena Lyashenko & Piotr Napieralski & Ganna Kharlamova, 2021. "Mineral Policy within the Framework of Limited Critical Resources and a Green Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-32, May.
    6. Victoria Vicario-Modroño & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos & Pedro Sánchez-Zamora, 2023. "Sustainability evaluation of olive oil mills in Andalusia (Spain): a study based on composite indicators," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6363-6392, July.
    7. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    8. Francisco Puig & Belen Garcia-Mora & Cristina Santamaria, 2011. "Survival of the firm and territory," ERSA conference papers ersa11p197, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Kevin P. Heanue, 2008. "Measuring Industrial Agglomeration in a Rural Industry: The Case of Irish Furniture Manufacturing," Working Papers 0830, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    10. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kogler, Dieter F., 2010. "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 381-410, Elsevier.
    11. Yu-Chun Lin & Yu-Hung Chang & Huang-Ting Yan, 2020. "Is trade a blessing or a curse? A panel data analysis of the determinants of depressive disorders," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(7), pages 1113-1121, September.
    12. Ying Zhu & Jicong Tan & Yan Cao & Yalin Liu & Yanzheng Liu & Qian Zhang & Quan Liu, 2022. "Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Environmental Economics Education: Under the Online and Offline Blended Teaching Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Lila Truett & Dale Truett, 2014. "A ray of hope? Another look at the Italian textile industry," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 525-542, March.
    14. Owain Simpson & Mark Elliott & Catherine Muller & Tim Jones & Phillippa Hentsch & Daniel Rooney & Nicole Cowell & William J. Bloss & Suzanne E. Bartington, 2022. "Evaluating Actions to Improve Air Quality at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-42, September.
    15. Nakhoda, Aadil, 2013. "The impact of the exports of BRIC countries plus Turkey on the exports of Pakistan," MPRA Paper 52477, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Rakan Alyamani & Suzanna Long, 2020. "The Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Sustainable Project Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Navas-Alemán, Lizbeth & Pietrobelli, Carlo & Kamiya, Marco, 2012. "Inter-Firm Linkages and Finance in Value Chains," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4067, Inter-American Development Bank.
    18. Grażyna Bartkowiak & Agnieszka Krugiełka & Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk & Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek-Bracha, 2022. "Experiencing Stress among Different Professional Groups in the Context of Their Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Wagner Cezar Lucato & José Carlos da Silva Santos & Athos Paulo Tadeu Pacchini, 2017. "Measuring the Sustainability of a Manufacturing Process: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Jiří Vyskočil & Petr Douda & Petr Novák & Bernhard Wally, 2023. "A Digital Twin-Based Distributed Manufacturing Execution System for Industry 4.0 with AI-Powered On-The-Fly Replanning Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5472-:d:554152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.