IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6131-d391948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Formulate an Effectual Tea Assessment System

Author

Listed:
  • Hwai-Hui Fu

    (Department of Business Administration, Shu-Te University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan)

  • Yan-Yu Chen

    (Department of Business Administration, Shu-Te University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan)

  • Guan-Jie Wang

    (Department of Business Administration, Shu-Te University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan)

Abstract

Taiwan tea is very famous around the world. This study aims to establish a quantized tea assessment system to increase the credibility of the current tea evaluation mechanism. In this study, a new procedure using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process integrated with linguistic variables is proposed to set up measurable indicators and determine their weights for a tea evaluation mechanism. An affinity diagram was used to deduce three dimensions (i.e., tea farm management, the tea-making process, and organoleptic evaluation) and 11 evaluation criteria for the construction of the tea assessment system. Sixteen experts, including 10 senior tea farmers and six national tea appraisers, were invited to participate in the one-on-one linguistic questionnaire survey. Analysis of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process shows that tea farm management gains the most weight (0.533), followed by the tea-making process (0.329), and organoleptic evaluation (0.138). Surprisingly, organoleptic evaluation, as the assessment criteria today, places last in the three evaluation dimensions. Findings of this study can provide the Taiwan Tea Association with insightful information for enhancing the current tea assessment system.

Suggested Citation

  • Hwai-Hui Fu & Yan-Yu Chen & Guan-Jie Wang, 2020. "Using a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process to Formulate an Effectual Tea Assessment System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6131-:d:391948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koray Altintas & Ozalp Vayvay & Sinan Apak & Emine Cobanoglu, 2020. "An Extended GRA Method Integrated with Fuzzy AHP to Construct a Multidimensional Index for Ranking Overall Energy Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Sarbast Moslem & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Thomas Blaschke & Szabolcs Duleba, 2019. "Analysing Stakeholder Consensus for a Sustainable Transport Development Decision by the Fuzzy AHP and Interval AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Hao-Chang Tsai & An-Sheng Lee & Huang-Ning Lee & Chien-Nan Chen & Yu-Chun Liu, 2020. "An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP on the Discussion of Training Indicators for the Regional Competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the Trade of Joinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laila Oubahman & Szabolcs Duleba, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of Homogenous Groups’ Preferences by Using AIP and AIJ Group AHP-PROMETHEE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Mohammed Abdul-Rahman & Wale Alade & Shahnawaz Anwer, 2023. "A Composite Resilience Index (CRI) for Developing Resilience and Sustainability in University Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili & Elio Padoano & Najmeh Rahmani, 2020. "Waste Reduction for Green Service Supply Chain—the Case Study of a Payment Service Provider in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Yu-Yu Ma & Chia-Liang Lin & Hung-Lung Lin, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Index and Solutions for Online English Teaching in the Post-COVID-19 Crisis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Faisal AlShareef & Mohammed Aljoufie, 2020. "Identification of the Proper Criteria Set for Neighborhood Walkability Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Model: A Case Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Ying Zhu & Jicong Tan & Yan Cao & Yalin Liu & Yanzheng Liu & Qian Zhang & Quan Liu, 2022. "Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Environmental Economics Education: Under the Online and Offline Blended Teaching Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Sarbast Moslem & Muhammet Gul & Danish Farooq & Erkan Celik & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Thomas Blaschke, 2020. "An Integrated Approach of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Rakan Alyamani & Suzanna Long, 2020. "The Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Sustainable Project Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Željko Stević & Dillip Kumar Das & Rade Tešić & Marijo Vidas & Dragan Vojinović, 2022. "Objective Criticism and Negative Conclusions on Using the Fuzzy SWARA Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Teerasak Charoennapharat & Poti Chaopaisarn, 2022. "Factors Affecting Multimodal Transport during COVID-19: A Thai Service Provider Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    11. Rafael Ninno Muniz & Carlos Tavares da Costa Júnior & William Gouvêa Buratto & Ademir Nied & Gabriel Villarrubia González, 2023. "The Sustainability Concept: A Review Focusing on Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Wei Yu & Xiaofei Ye & Jun Chen & Xingchen Yan & Tao Wang, 2020. "Evaluation Indexes and Correlation Analysis of Origination–Destination Travel Time of Nanjing Metro Based on Complex Network Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Enci Liu & Jie Li & Anni Zheng & Haoran Liu & Tao Jiang, 2022. "Research on the Prediction Model of the Used Car Price in View of the PSO-GRA-BP Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Konstantinos Kokkinos & Vayos Karayannis, 2020. "Supportiveness of Low-Carbon Energy Technology Policy Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Methodologies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-26, July.
    15. Swati Goyal & Shivi Agarwal & Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh & Trilok Mathur & Nirbhay Mathur, 2022. "Analysis of Hybrid MCDM Methods for the Performance Assessment and Ranking Public Transport Sector: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Małgorzata Trojanowska & Krzysztof Nęcka, 2020. "Selection of the Multiple-Criiater Decision-Making Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Energy Development: A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Ehsan Javanmardi & Sifeng Liu & Naiming Xie, 2020. "Exploring Grey Systems Theory-Based Methods and Applications in Sustainability Studies: A Systematic Review Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, May.
    18. Sovan Sankalp & Sanat Nalini Sahoo, 2023. "Fuzzy AHP modelling of urbanization and environmental stress to rank selected Indian cities for liveability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6727-6750, July.
    19. Yingyu Lu & Bo Cao & Yidi Hua & Lei Ding, 2020. "Efficiency Measurement of Green Regional Development and Its Influencing Factors: An Improved Data Envelopment Analysis Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2021. "Model Supporting Development Decisions by Considering Qualitative–Environmental Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6131-:d:391948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.