IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5391-d552792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting of Disassembly Waste Generation under Uncertainties Using Digital Twinning-Based Hidden Markov Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yinsheng Yang

    (College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

  • Gang Yuan

    (College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
    Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Management, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore)

  • Jiaxiang Cai

    (Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Management, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore)

  • Silin Wei

    (College of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China)

Abstract

Disassembly waste generation forecasting is the foundation for determining disassembly waste treatment and process formulation and is also an important prerequisite for optimizing waste management. The prediction of disassembly waste generation is a complex process which is affected by potential time, environment, and economy characteristic variables. Uncertainty features, such as disassembly amount, disassembly component status, and workshop scheduling, play an important role in predicting the fluctuation of disassembly waste generation. We therefore focus on revealing the trend of waste generation in disassembly remanufacturing that faces significant influences of technology and economic changes to achieve circular industry sustainable development. To dynamically predict the generation of disassembly waste under uncertainty, this work proposes a statistical method driven by a probabilistic model, which integrates the digital twinning, Gaussian mixture, and the hidden Markov model (DG-HMM). First, digital twinning technology is used for real-time data interaction between simulation prediction and decision evaluation. Then, the Gaussian mixture and HMM are used to dynamically predict the generation of disassembly waste. In order to effectively predict the amount of disassembly waste generation, real data collected from a disassembly enterprise are used to train and verify the model. Finally, the proposed model is compared with other general prediction models to illustrate the correctness and feasibility of the proposed model. The comparison results show that DG-HMM has better prediction accuracy for the actual disassembly waste generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinsheng Yang & Gang Yuan & Jiaxiang Cai & Silin Wei, 2021. "Forecasting of Disassembly Waste Generation under Uncertainties Using Digital Twinning-Based Hidden Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5391-:d:552792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5391/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5391/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boţ, R.I. & Csetnek, E.R. & Vuong, P.T., 2020. "The forward–backward–forward method from continuous and discrete perspective for pseudo-monotone variational inequalities in Hilbert spaces," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 49-60.
    2. Roubík, Hynek & Mazancová, Jana & Phung, Le Dinh & Banout, Jan, 2018. "Current approach to manure management for small-scale Southeast Asian farmers - Using Vietnamese biogas and non-biogas farms as an example," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 362-370.
    3. Roubík, Hynek & Mazancová, Jana & Rydval, Jan & Kvasnička, Roman, 2020. "Uncovering the dynamic complexity of the development of small–scale biogas technology through causal loops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 235-243.
    4. Chengpeng Lu & Xiaoli Pan & Xingpeng Chen & Jinhuang Mao & Jiaxing Pang & Bing Xue, 2021. "Modeling of Waste Flow in Industrial Symbiosis System at City-Region Level: A Case Study of Jinchang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Jiang, P. & Liu, X., 2016. "Hidden Markov model for municipal waste generation forecasting under uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 639-651.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ágnes Bárkányi & Attila Egedy & Attila Sarkady & Róbert Kurdi & János Abonyi, 2022. "Expert-Based Modular Simulator for Municipal Waste Processing Technology Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Sahar Ahmadzadeh & Tahmina Ajmal & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Yanqing Duan, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Food Waste Reduction Based on IoT and Big Data Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Radovan Šomplák & Veronika Smejkalová & Martin Rosecký & Lenka Szásziová & Vlastimír Nevrlý & Dušan Hrabec & Martin Pavlas, 2023. "Comprehensive Review on Waste Generation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Kit Wayne Chew & Shir Reen Chia & Hong-Wei Yen & Saifuddin Nomanbhay & Yeek-Chia Ho & Pau Loke Show, 2019. "Transformation of Biomass Waste into Sustainable Organic Fertilizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Hynek Roubík & Jana Mazancová & Phung Le Dinh & Dung Dinh Van & Jan Banout, 2018. "Biogas Quality across Small-Scale Biogas Plants: A Case of Central Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Xu Dong & Yang Chen & Qinqin Zhuang & Yali Yang & Xiaomeng Zhao, 2022. "Agglomeration of Productive Services, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis Based on 68 Prefectural-Level-and-Above Cities in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Yekini Shehu & Lulu Liu & Qiao-Li Dong & Jen-Chih Yao, 2022. "A Relaxed Forward-Backward-Forward Algorithm with Alternated Inertial Step: Weak and Linear Convergence," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 959-990, December.
    6. Ferdinard U. Ogbuisi & Yekini Shehu & Jen-Chih Yao, 2023. "Relaxed Single Projection Methods for Solving Bilevel Variational Inequality Problems in Hilbert Spaces," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 641-678, September.
    7. Zhang, Yizhen & Jiang, Yan & Wang, Shun & Wang, Zhongzhong & Liu, Yanchen & Hu, Zhenhu & Zhan, Xinmin, 2021. "Environmental sustainability assessment of pig manure mono- and co-digestion and dynamic land application of the digestate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Gaowen Lei & Sidai Guo & Zihan Yuan, 2022. "Study on the Effect and Mechanism of Circular Economy Promotion Law on the Utilization Rate of Industrial Solid Waste in Resource-Based Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Radovan Šomplák & Veronika Smejkalová & Martin Rosecký & Lenka Szásziová & Vlastimír Nevrlý & Dušan Hrabec & Martin Pavlas, 2023. "Comprehensive Review on Waste Generation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Chibuzo Stanley Nwankwo & Chigozie Francis Okoyeuzu & Ikpeama Ahamefula, 2020. "Efficiency of a modified plastic tank as a bio-degradation system in Sub-Saharan African countries," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(3), pages 89-96.
    11. Taheri, Nima & Jahani, Hamed & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2024. "Modeling sustainable bioethanol supply chain in Australia: A system dynamics approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Schücking, Maximilian & Jochem, Patrick, 2021. "Two-stage stochastic program optimizing the cost of electric vehicles in commercial fleets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    13. Roubík, H. & Mazancová, J., 2019. "Small-scale biogas plants in central Vietnam and biogas appliances with a focus on a flue gas analysis of biogas cook stoves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1138-1145.
    14. Bridget Tawiah Badu Eshun & Albert P.C. Chan, 2021. "An Evaluation of Project Risk Dynamics in Sino-Africa Public Infrastructure Delivery; A Causal Loop and Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach (ISM-CLD)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Bipasyana Dhungana & Sunil Prasad Lohani & Michael Marsolek, 2022. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste with Livestock Manure at Ambient Temperature: A Biogas Based Circular Economy and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Roubík, Hynek & Mazancová, Jana & Rydval, Jan & Kvasnička, Roman, 2020. "Uncovering the dynamic complexity of the development of small–scale biogas technology through causal loops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 235-243.
    17. An Zhou & Shenhan Wu & Zhujie Chu & Wei-Chiao Huang, 2019. "Regional Differences in Municipal Solid Waste Collection Quantities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-12, July.
    18. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson & Manzhynski, Siarhei, 2021. "Between you and I: A portfolio theory of the circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Qian Li & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Yubin Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Training on Beef Cattle Farmers’ Installation of Biogas Digesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Ali Taghi-Molla & Masoud Rabbani & Mohammad Hosein Karimi Gavareshki & Ehsan Dehghani, 2020. "Safety improvement in a gas refinery based on resilience engineering and macro-ergonomics indicators: a Bayesian network–artificial neural network approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(3), pages 641-654, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5391-:d:552792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.