IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p25-d466573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Language of Sustainable Tourism as a Proxy Indicator of Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Rene Brauer

    (Department of Human Geography, Lund University, Sölvegatan 10, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
    Karelian Institute, University of Eastern Finland, FI-8010 Joensuu, Finland)

  • Mirek Dymitrow

    (Department of Human Geography, Lund University, Sölvegatan 10, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
    Department of Economy and Society—Unit for Human Geography, University of Gothenburg, 411 25 Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

Sustainable tourism (ST) has recently become the mainstream of the tourism industry and, accordingly, has influenced contemporary tourism research. However, ST is not just theories about indications and contraindications of global travel, but also a specific language that needs mastering to take sustainability work forward. In other words, what research receives recognition depends on the proficiency in how the articulation in research proposals and within assessment under the heading of “research impact”. The aim of this paper is to investigate how tourism research gains recognition within research evaluation, by investigating the national research appraisal in the United Kingdom (Research Excellence Framework). By using content analysis, we disentangle the rhetorical choices and narrative constructions within researchers’ impact claims. Our findings suggest that researchers adopt a rhetorical style that implies causality and promotes good outcomes facilitating ST. However, the structure of the assessment format enforces an articulation of sustainable research impact without stating the methodological limitations of that such claim. Therefore, the rhetorical choices of ST researchers merely represent a proxy indicator of the claimed impact. We conclude that the lack of rigor in accounting for the impact of ST research may inadvertently restrict attaining ST.

Suggested Citation

  • Rene Brauer & Mirek Dymitrow, 2020. "The Language of Sustainable Tourism as a Proxy Indicator of Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:25-:d:466573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tribe, John & Liburd, Janne J., 2016. "The tourism knowledge system," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 44-61.
    2. Kai-Michael Griese & Kim Werner & Johannes Hogg, 2017. "Avoiding Greenwashing in Event Marketing: An Exploration of Concepts, Literature and Methods," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Tribe, John, 2018. "Creating and curating tourism knowledge," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 14-25.
    4. Thomas, Rhodri & Ormerod, Neil, 2017. "The (almost) imperceptible impact of tourism research on policy and practice," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 379-389.
    5. Tharapos, Meredith & Marriott, Neil, 2020. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: Research quality in accounting education," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    6. Civera, Alice & Lehmann, Erik E. & Paleari, Stefano & Stockinger, Sarah A.E., 2020. "Higher education policy: Why hope for quality when rewarding quantity?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    7. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 489-500, May.
    8. Bella Reichard & Mark S Reed & Jenn Chubb & Ged Hall & Lucy Jowett & Alisha Peart & Andrea Whittle, 2020. "Writing impact case studies: a comparative study of high-scoring and low-scoring case studies from REF2014," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Lamers, Machiel & van der Duim, René & Spaargaren, Gert, 2017. "The relevance of practice theories for tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 54-63.
    10. Hicks, Diana, 2012. "Performance-based university research funding systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 251-261.
    11. Juvan, Emil & Dolnicar, Sara, 2014. "The attitude–behaviour gap in sustainable tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 76-95.
    12. Tsey, Komla & Onnis, Leigh-ann & Whiteside, Mary & McCalman, Janya & Williams, Megan & Heyeres, Marion & Lui, Siu Man (Carrie) & Klieve, Helen & Cadet-James, Yvonne & Baird, Leslie & Brown, Catherine , 2019. "Assessing research impact: Australian Research Council criteria and the case of Family Wellbeing research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 176-186.
    13. Brauer, Rene & Dymitrow, Mirek & Tribe, John, 2019. "The impact of tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 64-78.
    14. Juha-Pekka Lauronen, 2020. "The dilemmas and uncertainties in assessing the societal impact of research," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 207-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dotti, Nicola Francesco & Walczyk, Julia, 2022. "What is the societal impact of university research? A policy-oriented review to map approaches, identify monitoring methods and success factors," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Brauer, Rene & Dymitrow, Mirek & Tribe, John, 2019. "The impact of tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 64-78.
    3. Schweinsberg, Stephen & Fennell, David & Hassanli, Najmeh, 2021. "Academic dissent in a post COVID-19 world," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Juha-Pekka Lauronen, 2022. "Tension in Interpretations of the Social Impact of the Social Sciences: Walking a Tightrope Between Divergent Conceptualizations of Research Utilization," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    5. Weaver, David & Tang, Chuanzhong & Zhao, Yanzhi, 2020. "Facilitating sustainable tourism by endogenization: China as exemplar," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Sharma, Anuj & Nunkoo, Robin & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2021. "On the intellectual structure and influence of tourism social science research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Mehmet Pinar, 2023. "Do research performances of universities and disciplines in England converge or diverge? An assessment of the progress between research excellence frameworks in 2014 and 2021," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(10), pages 5731-5766, October.
    8. Seokbeom Kwon & Kazuyuki Motohashi & Kenta Ikeuchi, 2022. "Chasing two hares at once? Effect of joint institutional change for promoting commercial use of university knowledge and scientific research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1242-1272, August.
    9. Anna Jakubczak & Małgorzata Gotowska, 2020. "Green Consumerism vs. Greenwashing," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 167-181.
    10. Gössling, Stefan & Moyle, Brent D. & Weaver, David, 2021. "Academic entrepreneurship: A bibliometric engagement model," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Thomas, Rhodri, 2021. "Problematising ‘The impact of tourism research’: A reply to Brauer, Dymitrow, and Tribe (2019)," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Daniele Rotolo & Michael Hopkins & Nicola Grassano, 2023. "Do funding sources complement or substitute? Examining the impact of cancer research publications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 50-66, January.
    13. Anna Jakubczak & Malgorzata Gotowska, 2020. "Green Consumerism vs. Greenwashing," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1098-1112.
    14. Cole, Stroma & Wardana, Agung & Dharmiasih, Wiwik, 2021. "Making an impact on Bali's water crisis: Research to mobilize NGOs, the tourism industry and policy makers," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Timmons, Shane & Whelan, Ava & Kelly, Clare, 2023. "An experimental test of a greenwashing inoculation intervention: Effects on identification, trust and intentions," Papers WP760, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    16. Wood, Roy C., 2017. "The unspoken question: A response to Thomas and Ormerod," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 390-393.
    17. Mario Fernandes & Andreas Walter, 2023. "The times they are a-changin’: profiling newly tenured business economics professors in Germany over the past thirty years," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(5), pages 929-971, July.
    18. Anxin Xu & Chenwen Wei & Manhua Zheng & Lili Sun & Decong Tang, 2022. "Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Alessia Acampora & Michele Preziosi & Maria Claudia Lucchetti & Roberto Merli, 2022. "The Role of Hotel Environmental Communication and Guests’ Environmental Concern in Determining Guests’ Behavioral Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Jill Johnes, 2018. "University rankings: What do they really show?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 585-606, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:25-:d:466573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.