IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3113-d344885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Young Pioneers, Vitality, and Commercial Gentrification in Mudan Street, Changchun, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhang

    (School of Geographical Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Zuopeng Ma

    (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China)

  • Dawei Li

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Wei Liu

    (School of Geographical Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Yao Tong

    (School of Geographical Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Chenggu Li

    (School of Geographical Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

The pioneers who started the gentrification process have contributed significantly to the activation of gentrified neighborhoods, but are often overlooked in top-down urban governance strategies. We studied the core participants, who were avant-garde café owners, in the initial stage of the commercial gentrification of Mudan Street in Changchun, China. By participatory observations and in-depth interviews, we closely investigated the statuses, behaviors, and preferences of the early gentrifiers, their contributions to block revivals, and the impacts of urban renewal policies on the gentrifiers themselves. Our conclusions are as follows. Most early gentrifiers were young and highly educated. They started the process of gentrification by youth culture production, which exhibited idealistic operating behaviors, such as the decoration of shops, creation of cultural atmospheres, and organization of cultural activities. They were the pioneers who drove bottom-up block renewal, reshaped traditional blocks into youth cultural consumption centers, and stimulated commercial vitality. However, commercialization was followed by soaring rents and increasing business competition that have forced many pioneers with low economic capital to leave. Furthermore, urban governance has had strong impacts on block renewal and gentrification. Inclusive management has promoted bottom-up neighborhood renewal, whereas arbitrary management has quickly destroyed the cultural landscape and business atmosphere, thereby accelerating the displacement of the pioneers. This study provides new evidence for gentrification theories, and offers a practical reflection for urban governance by constructing the profiles of early gentrifiers and discussing the paradox of gentrification in the context of urban China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhang & Zuopeng Ma & Dawei Li & Wei Liu & Yao Tong & Chenggu Li, 2020. "Young Pioneers, Vitality, and Commercial Gentrification in Mudan Street, Changchun, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3113-:d:344885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackelyn Hwang, 2016. "Pioneers of Gentrification: Transformation in Global Neighborhoods in Urban America in the Late Twentieth Century," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 53(1), pages 189-213, February.
    2. Jörg Blasius & Jürgen Friedrichs & Heiko Rühl, 2016. "Pioneers and gentrifiers in the process of gentrification," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 50-69, January.
    3. Jörg Blasius & Jürgen Friedrichs & Heiko Rühl, 2016. "Pioneers and gentrifiers in the process of gentrification," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 50-69, January.
    4. Guiwen Liu & Zhiyong Yi & Xiaoling Zhang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek & Lizhen Wei, 2017. "An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Policies of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. HaeRan Shin & Quentin Stevens, 2013. "How Culture and Economy Meet in South Korea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture-led Urban Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1707-1723, September.
    6. Yoonchae Yoon & Jina Park, 2018. "Stage Classification and Characteristics Analysis of Commercial Gentrification in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saebae Ryu & Saehim Kim & Mi-Jeong Cho & Myeong-Hun Lee, 2022. "Defining the “Hip Factor”: Analysis of Location Properties, SNS Usage, and Other “Hip-Place” Characteristics That Influence Visitor Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jenny Künkel, 2017. "Gentrification and the flexibilisation of spatial control: Policing sex work in Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(3), pages 730-746, February.
    2. Ingmar Pastak & Eneli Kindsiko & Tiit Tammaru & Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham, 2019. "Commercial Gentrification in Post‐Industrial Neighbourhoods: A Dynamic View From an Entrepreneur’s Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(5), pages 588-604, December.
    3. Bereitschaft, Bradley, 2020. "Gentrification and the evolution of commuting behavior within America's urban cores, 2000–2015," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. HaeRan Shin, 2016. "Re-making a place-of-memory: The competition between representativeness and place-making knowledge in Gwangju, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(16), pages 3566-3583, December.
    6. Thomas Borén & Patrycja Grzyś & Craig Young, 2021. "Spatializing authoritarian neoliberalism by way of cultural politics: City, nation and the European Union in Gdańsk’s politics of cultural policy formation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1211-1230, September.
    7. Bing Xia & Jindong Wu & Jiaqi Wang & Yitao Fang & Haodi Shen & Jingli Shen, 2021. "Sustainable Renewal Methods of Urban Public Parking Spaces under the Scenario of Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAV): A Review and a Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Zhiyong Yi & Guiwen Liu & Wei Lang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek, 2017. "Strategic Approaches to Sustainable Urban Renewal in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Wonjun Cho & Minho Kim & Hyunjung Kim & Youngsang Kwon, 2020. "Transforming Housing to Commercial Use: A Case Study on Commercial Gentrification in Yeon-nam District, Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Chen Liu & Jia Liu, 2023. "Resilience of Living Streets in Small and Medium-Sized Towns: A Grounded Theory Study of Yixing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Jiwu Wang & Chengyu Tong & Xuewei Hu, 2021. "Policy Zoning Method for Innovation Districts to Sustainably Develop the Knowledge-Economy: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Kelly Parsons & David Barling, 2022. "Identifying the Policy Instrument Interactions to Enable the Public Procurement of Sustainable Food," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Marlene Orozco, 2020. "Reconceptualizing the Enclave: Measuring Success Among Latino‐Owned Businesses," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1374-1396, July.
    15. Jiman Park & Jihang Kim & Byungyun Yang, 2020. "Spatializing an Artist-Resident Community Area at a Building-Level: A Case Study of Garosu-Gil, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Dai Whan An & Jae-Young Lee, 2023. "Implications of Renovated Buildings in Yeonnam-Dong, Seoul, an Area under Commercial Gentrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Hwayeon Ryu & Donghyun Kim & Jina Park, 2020. "Characteristics Analysis of Commercial Gentrification in Seoul Focusing on the Vitalization of Streets in Residential Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Francisco Conejo-Arrabal & Carlos Rosa-Jiménez & Nuria Nebot-Gómez de Salazar, 2023. "Patterns of Public Spaces in Spanish Mediterranean Touristified Historic Centres Based on Their Activities: Case Study of Malaga," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    20. Juan Uribe-Toril & José Luis Ruiz-Real & Jaime De Pablo Valenciano, 2018. "Gentrification as an Emerging Source of Environmental Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3113-:d:344885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.