IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1960-d1041718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Renovated Buildings in Yeonnam-Dong, Seoul, an Area under Commercial Gentrification

Author

Listed:
  • Dai Whan An

    (Department of Architecture, Chungbuk National University, ChungDaeRo 1, Seowon Gu, Cheongju-si 28644, Republic of Korea)

  • Jae-Young Lee

    (School of Architecture, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

We aimed to identify the characteristics of the changes in the buildings and alleyways in Yeonnam-dong, Seoul, where low-rise, residential buildings are being renovated or repurposed into commercial buildings, as well as to investigate their renovations, repurposes, and sociocultural implications. Thus, we surveyed and classified 149 renovated buildings, investigated the perceptions and ambiance of the area and buildings using a trade area analysis and interviews with visitors and store owners, and uncovered the importance of renovation. Since the early gentrification, a trend of performing renovations that retained the original form of the building from the initial renovation stage was seen; this created an ambiance of nostalgia, naturalness, and authenticity, along with the urban conditions of low-rise, residential buildings in Yeonnam-dong, a representative undeveloped area. These renovated buildings reflect the social status, taste, and practice of gentrifiers, and they reveal a hybridization of the past and present, Korean circumstances and exotic cultures, and residential and commercial buildings. As commercialization progressed, renovated buildings vastly differing from the original and displaying active commercial characteristics were seen. Our findings imply that the area’s early ambiance, which had an air of “distinctiveness”, has lost its personality and begun to generalize. Thus, numerous gentrifiers have been replaced and several aspects of renovation have changed that the visitors are aware of.

Suggested Citation

  • Dai Whan An & Jae-Young Lee, 2023. "Implications of Renovated Buildings in Yeonnam-Dong, Seoul, an Area under Commercial Gentrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1960-:d:1041718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1960/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1960/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shin, Hyun Bang & Kim, Soo-Hyun, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60439, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. David Ley & Sin Yih Teo, 2014. "Gentrification in Hong Kong? Epistemology vs. Ontology," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1286-1303, July.
    3. Yoonchae Yoon & Jina Park, 2018. "Stage Classification and Characteristics Analysis of Commercial Gentrification in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    2. Tsang, Churn & Hsu, Lin-Fang, 2022. "Beneath the appearance of state-led gentrification: The case of the Kwun Tong Town Centre redevelopment in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Seon Young Lee, 2018. "Cities for profit: Profit-driven gentrification in Seoul, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2603-2617, September.
    4. Hae Yeon Choo, 2021. "Speculative homemaking: Women’s labour, class mobility and the affect of homeownership in South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 148-163, January.
    5. Paul Waley, 2016. "Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 615-625, February.
    6. Olabisi S. Obaitor & Marion Stellmes & Tobia Lakes, 2024. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Gentrification Processes in Intracity Slums in the Lagos Megacity," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Bokyong Shin & Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2021. "Media and the Meanings of Land: A South Korean Case Study," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 381-425, March.
    8. Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2023. "Exploring Social Capital Level in Regions with Large and Increasing Wealth Inequality: Lesson from Seoul, South Korea," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 165-183, August.
    9. Seowoo Nam & Seung‐Ook Lee, 2023. "URBAN REGENERATION IN SEOUL: Alternative Urbanism or the Resilience of Neoliberal Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 601-623, July.
    10. Salleh, Alia, 2023. "Does the culture of property normalise eviction and demolition? The case of Kampung Sungai Baru, Kuala Lumpur," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118023, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Hyun Bang Shin & Soo-Hyun Kim, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 540-559, February.
    12. Emma Colven, 2023. "A political ecology of speculative urbanism: The role of financial and environmental speculation in Jakarta’s water crisis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 490-510, March.
    13. Francisco José Chamizo-Nieto & Nuria Nebot-Gómez de Salazar & Carlos Rosa-Jiménez & Sergio Reyes-Corredera, 2023. "Touristification and Conflicts of Interest in Cruise Destinations: The Case of Main Cultural Tourism Cities on the Spanish Mediterranean Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.
    14. Khaled Ali Abuhasel, 2023. "Assessing Public Service Distribution in Abha and Bisha Cities, Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Qinran Yang & David Ley, 2019. "Residential relocation and the remaking of socialist workers through state-facilitated urban redevelopment in Chengdu, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2480-2498, September.
    16. Ray Forrest, 2016. "Commentary: Variegated gentrification?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 609-614, February.
    17. Choi, Chang Gyu & Lee, Sugie & Kim, Heungsoon & Seong, Eun Yeong, 2019. "Critical junctures and path dependence in urban planning and housing policy: A review of greenbelts and New Towns in Korea’s Seoul metropolitan area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 195-204.
    18. Wing-Shing Tang, 2017. "Beyond Gentrification: Hegemonic Redevelopment in Hong Kong," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 487-499, May.
    19. Dimitar Anguelov, 2023. "Financializing urban infrastructure? The speculative state-spaces of ‘public-public partnerships’ in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 445-470, March.
    20. Cuz Potter & Danielle Labbé, 2021. "Gentrification or …? Injustice in large-scale residential projects in Hanoi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2456-2472, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1960-:d:1041718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.