IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1960-d1041718.html

Implications of Renovated Buildings in Yeonnam-Dong, Seoul, an Area under Commercial Gentrification

Author

Listed:
  • Dai Whan An

    (Department of Architecture, Chungbuk National University, ChungDaeRo 1, Seowon Gu, Cheongju-si 28644, Republic of Korea)

  • Jae-Young Lee

    (School of Architecture, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

We aimed to identify the characteristics of the changes in the buildings and alleyways in Yeonnam-dong, Seoul, where low-rise, residential buildings are being renovated or repurposed into commercial buildings, as well as to investigate their renovations, repurposes, and sociocultural implications. Thus, we surveyed and classified 149 renovated buildings, investigated the perceptions and ambiance of the area and buildings using a trade area analysis and interviews with visitors and store owners, and uncovered the importance of renovation. Since the early gentrification, a trend of performing renovations that retained the original form of the building from the initial renovation stage was seen; this created an ambiance of nostalgia, naturalness, and authenticity, along with the urban conditions of low-rise, residential buildings in Yeonnam-dong, a representative undeveloped area. These renovated buildings reflect the social status, taste, and practice of gentrifiers, and they reveal a hybridization of the past and present, Korean circumstances and exotic cultures, and residential and commercial buildings. As commercialization progressed, renovated buildings vastly differing from the original and displaying active commercial characteristics were seen. Our findings imply that the area’s early ambiance, which had an air of “distinctiveness”, has lost its personality and begun to generalize. Thus, numerous gentrifiers have been replaced and several aspects of renovation have changed that the visitors are aware of.

Suggested Citation

  • Dai Whan An & Jae-Young Lee, 2023. "Implications of Renovated Buildings in Yeonnam-Dong, Seoul, an Area under Commercial Gentrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1960-:d:1041718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1960/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1960/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shin, Hyun Bang & Kim, Soo-Hyun, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60439, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. David Ley & Sin Yih Teo, 2014. "Gentrification in Hong Kong? Epistemology vs. Ontology," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1286-1303, July.
    3. Yoonchae Yoon & Jina Park, 2018. "Stage Classification and Characteristics Analysis of Commercial Gentrification in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loretta Lees, 2024. "Planetary Gentrification And Urban Authoritarianism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 729-737, July.
    2. Paul Waley, 2016. "Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 615-625, February.
    3. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    4. Tsang, Churn & Hsu, Lin-Fang, 2022. "Beneath the appearance of state-led gentrification: The case of the Kwun Tong Town Centre redevelopment in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Seon Young Lee, 2018. "Cities for profit: Profit-driven gentrification in Seoul, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2603-2617, September.
    6. Hae Yeon Choo, 2021. "Speculative homemaking: Women’s labour, class mobility and the affect of homeownership in South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 148-163, January.
    7. Emma Colven, 2023. "A political ecology of speculative urbanism: The role of financial and environmental speculation in Jakarta’s water crisis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 490-510, March.
    8. Dan Liu & Femke van Noorloos & Maggi W. H. Leung & Ajay Bailey, 2026. "Invisible displacement of residents: Rethinking ‘voluntary relocation’ in Beijing’s heritage-led regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(5), pages 986-1003, April.
    9. Choi, Chang Gyu & Lee, Sugie & Kim, Heungsoon & Seong, Eun Yeong, 2019. "Critical junctures and path dependence in urban planning and housing policy: A review of greenbelts and New Towns in Korea’s Seoul metropolitan area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 195-204.
    10. Wing-Shing Tang, 2017. "Beyond Gentrification: Hegemonic Redevelopment in Hong Kong," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 487-499, May.
    11. Wonjun Cho & Minho Kim & Hyunjung Kim & Youngsang Kwon, 2020. "Transforming Housing to Commercial Use: A Case Study on Commercial Gentrification in Yeon-nam District, Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Carolyn Cartier, 2017. "Contextual Urban Theory and the ‘Appeal’ of Gentrification: Lost in Transposition?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 466-477, May.
    13. Jiman Park & Jihang Kim & Byungyun Yang, 2020. "Spatializing an Artist-Resident Community Area at a Building-Level: A Case Study of Garosu-Gil, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Klink, Jeroen & Stroher, Laisa Eleonora Maróstica, 2017. "The making of urban financialization? An exploration of brazilian urban partnership operations with building certificates," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 519-528.
    15. Tai-Lok Lui, 2017. "Beneath the Appearance of Gentrification: Probing Local Complexities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 478-486, May.
    16. Donghyun Kim & Jina Park, 2020. "Assessing Social and Spatial Equity of Neighborhood Retail and Service Access in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Heng Chao, 2022. "Relativizing State Space: Deciphering China’s New Dynamics of Urban Transformation Engineered through the Creation of National New Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Liu Cao, 2023. "Consuming ‘authenticity’? Reinterpreting the ‘new middle class’ in China through the lens of retailing changes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(3), pages 501-518, February.
    19. Kon Kim, 2022. "Exclusion and Cooperation of the Urban Poor Outside the Institutional Framework of the Smart City: A Case of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Emine Yetiskul & Sule Demirel, 2018. "Assembling gentrification in Istanbul: The Cihangir neighbourhood of BeyoÄŸlu," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3336-3352, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1960-:d:1041718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.