IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1377-d320117.html

The Places Children Go: Understanding Spatial Patterns and Formation Mechanism for Children’s Commercial Activity Space in Changchun City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Chenggu Li

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Yao Tong

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Zuopeng Ma

    (Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the demand for children’s activities has been increasing, and the children’s consumer market has expanded annually. A large number of urban commercial spaces for children’s activity that meet the needs of children’s activities have been built in Chinese cities. This paper analyzed the distribution of these spaces in Changchun City, divided children’s activity space into five categories, analyzed the distribution and spatial differentiation using ArcGIS tools, and discussed the formation mechanism of the spatial pattern of children’s activity space. The results show that: (a) The spatial agglomeration of children’s activity places in Changchun was remarkable and formed a multicore spatial pattern of three municipal and six district-level centers. (b) Different varieties of children’s activity places showed significant spatial differences with “center–periphery” and spatial distribution patterns and each block unit had specialized characteristics. (c) The diversification and social demand for children’s activities, children’s consumption (a new growth factor for the modern service industry), market competition for rent, coupling relationship with urban functional areas, traffic convenience and accessibility, and changes of children’s activity behavior patterns and preferences were the main factors that influence commercial children’s activity space in Changchun. (d) The inequitable spatial distribution of children’s activities, the poor accessibility of children’s activity places, the lack of outdoor places and natural elements, the excessive concentration of children’s activities, and the lack of reasonable guidance of children’s commercial activity places in the city pose challenges for daily activities of urban children. Based on these results, this paper put forward some constructive policy suggestions, such as the planned addition of children’s public places and children’s outdoor places, enriched green and natural elements of children’s places, the construction of children’s activities facilities in residential areas, and the addition of children’s activity facilities in the compulsory standards for urban construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu & Chenggu Li & Yao Tong & Jing Zhang & Zuopeng Ma, 2020. "The Places Children Go: Understanding Spatial Patterns and Formation Mechanism for Children’s Commercial Activity Space in Changchun City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1377-:d:320117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roderick Lawrence, 2019. "Transdisciplinary Responses to Children’s Health Challenges in the Context of Rapid Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Chambers, T. & Pearson, A.L. & Kawachi, I. & Rzotkiewicz, Z. & Stanley, J. & Smith, M. & barr, M. & Ni Mhurchu, C. & Signal, L., 2017. "Kids in space: Measuring children's residential neighborhoods and other destinations using activity space GPS and wearable camera data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 41-50.
    3. Sarah L. Holloway & Helena Pimlott-Wilson, 2014. "Enriching Children, Institutionalizing Childhood? Geographies of Play, Extracurricular Activities, and Parenting in England," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(3), pages 613-627, May.
    4. Laura J. Shillington & Ann Marie F. Murnaghan, 2016. "Urban Political Ecologies and Children's Geographies: Queering Urban Ecologies of Childhood," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 1017-1035, September.
    5. Lia Karsten, 2002. "Mapping Childhood in Amsterdam: the spatial and social construction of children’s domains in the city," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(3), pages 231-241, August.
    6. Billings, Stephen B. & Johnson, Erik B., 2012. "The location quotient as an estimator of industrial concentration," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 642-647.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mian Yang & Wenjie Fan & Jian Qiu & Sining Zhang & Jinting Li, 2022. "The Evaluation of Rural Outdoor Dining Environment from Consumer Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark P.C. Cherrie & Niamh K. Shortt & Catharine Ward Thompson & Ian J. Deary & Jamie R. Pearce, 2019. "Association Between the Activity Space Exposure to Parks in Childhood and Adolescence and Cognitive Aging in Later Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Seungil Yum, 2019. "The interaction between knowledge-intensive business services and urban economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 53-83, August.
    3. Geoff Boeing, 2020. "Online rental housing market representation and the digital reproduction of urban inequality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 449-468, March.
    4. Xiaodong Zhang & Haoying Han & Yongjun Tang & Zhilu Chen, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Tourism Resources in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Lia Karsten, 2014. "From Yuppies to Yupps: Family Gentrifiers Consuming Spaces and Re-inventing Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 175-188, April.
    6. Lia Karsten, 2003. "Family Gentrifiers: Challenging the City as a Place Simultaneously to Build a Career and to Raise Children," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2573-2584, November.
    7. Jason Y. Scully & Anne Vernez Moudon & Philip M. Hurvitz & Anju Aggarwal & Adam Drewnowski, 2019. "A Time-Based Objective Measure of Exposure to the Food Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Chihsin Chiu, 2020. "Theorizing Public Participation and Local Governance in Urban Resilience: Reflections on the “Provincializing Urban Political Ecology” Thesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Kobakhidze, M. Nutsa & Ying, Ma & Tsaloukidis, A. Alexandros, 2023. "The impact of social class on out-of-school activities: Converging trends in parental choices?," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Zhaoxi Zhang & Prince Michael Amegbor & Clive Eric Sabel, 2022. "The Feasibility of Integrating Wearable Cameras and Health Trackers for Measuring Personal Exposure to Urban Features: A Pilot Study in Roskilde, Denmark," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Roderick J. Lawrence, 2023. "Promoting and Sustaining Urban Health: Challenges and Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Sarah Little & Art Rice, 2021. "Considering Autonomous Exploration in Healthy Environments: Reflections from an Urban Wildscape," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Leung, Kevin Y.K. & Astroza, Sebastian & Loo, Becky P.Y. & Bhat, Chandra R., 2019. "An environment-people interactions framework for analysing children's extra-curricular activities and active transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 341-358.
    14. Yi-Chang Chiang & Tzen-Ying Ling, 2017. "Exploring Flood Resilience Thinking in the Retail Sector under Climate Change: A Case Study of an Estuarine Region of Taipei City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Xiyan Mao & Peiyu Wang, 2023. "Import–export nexus and China's emerging trade in environmental goods," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 157-181, March.
    16. Tamara Al-Obaidi & Jason Prior & Erica McIntyre, 2022. "Conceptual Approaches of Health and Wellbeing at the Apartment Building Scale: A Review of Australian Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    17. John Horton & Peter Kraftl, 2018. "Three playgrounds: Researching the multiple geographies of children’s outdoor play," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(1), pages 214-235, February.
    18. Roderick J. Lawrence, 2022. "Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 61-74.
    19. Roderick J. Lawrence, 2022. "Co-Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 61-74.
    20. Anabela Marques Santos & Francesco Molica & Carlos Torrecilla Salinas, 2024. "EU-funded investment in Artificial Intelligence and regional specialization," GEE Papers 181, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Jul 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1377-:d:320117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.