IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10411-d461160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges in Using Earth Observation (EO) Data to Support Environmental Management in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Mercio Cerbaro

    (Centre for Environment & Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Stephen Morse

    (Centre for Environment & Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Richard Murphy

    (Centre for Environment & Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Jim Lynch

    (Centre for Environment & Sustainability, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK)

  • Geoffrey Griffiths

    (Department of Geography, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AB, UK)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of research designed to explore the challenges involved in the use of Earth Observation (EO) data to support environmental management Brazil. While much has been written about the technology and applications of EO, the perspective of end-users of EO data and their needs has been under-explored in the literature. A total of 53 key informants in Brasilia and the cities of Rio Branco and Cuiaba were interviewed regarding their current use and experience of EO data and the expressed challenges that they face. The research builds upon a conceptual model which illustrates the main steps and limitations in the flow of EO data and information for use in the management of land use and land cover (LULC) in Brazil. The current paper analyzes and ranks, by relative importance, the factors that users identify as limiting their use of EO. The most important limiting factor for the end-user was the lack of personnel, followed by political and economic context, data management, innovation, infrastructure and IT, technical capacity to use and process EO data, bureaucracy, limitations associated with access to high-resolution data, and access to ready-to-use product. In general, users expect to access a ready-to-use product, transformed from the raw EO data into usable information. Related to this is the question of whether this processing is best done within an organization or sourced from outside. Our results suggest that, despite the potential of EO data for informing environmental management in Brazil, its use remains constrained by its lack of suitably trained personnel and financial resources, as well as the poor communication between institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mercio Cerbaro & Stephen Morse & Richard Murphy & Jim Lynch & Geoffrey Griffiths, 2020. "Challenges in Using Earth Observation (EO) Data to Support Environmental Management in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10411-:d:461160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mercio Cerbaro & Stephen Morse & Richard Murphy & Jim Lynch & Geoffrey Griffiths, 2020. "Information from Earth Observation for the Management of Sustainable Land Use and Land Cover in Brazil: An Analysis of User Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Jim Lynch & Mark Maslin & Heiko Balzter & Martin Sweeting, 2013. "Choose satellites to monitor deforestation," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7445), pages 293-294, April.
    3. Elinor Ostrom, 2014. "Do institutions for collective action evolve?," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 3-30, April.
    4. Gabriel Popkin, 2016. "Satellite alerts track deforestation in real time," Nature, Nature, vol. 530(7591), pages 392-393, February.
    5. Terciane Sabadini Carvalho & Edson Paulo Domingues, 2016. "Controlling Deforestation In The Brazilian Amazon: Regional Economic Impacts And Land-Use Change," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 192, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    6. Raoni Rajao & Yola Georgiadou, 2014. "Blame Games in the Amazon: Environmental Crises and the Emergence of a Transparency Regime in Brazil," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(4), pages 97-115, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ménard, Claude & Kurdin, Alexander & Shastitko, Andrey, 2020. "Out by the door, in through the window: Politics and natural gas regulation in Russia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Prashant Patil & Murali Krishna Gumma, 2018. "A Review of the Available Land Cover and Cropland Maps for South Asia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Claude Ménard, 2017. "Facing Crises: Economy, Democvracy, and Political Transaction Costs," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04000979, HAL.
    4. Augusto Mussi Alvim & Eduardo Rodrigues Sanguinet, 2021. "Climate Change Policies and the Carbon Tax Effect on Meat and Dairy Industries in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Fouladvand, Javanshir, 2022. "Behavioural attributes towards collective energy security in thermal energy communities: Environmental-friendly behaviour matters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    6. Danuta Milaszewicz & Kesra Nermend, 2020. "Application of Vector Measure Construction Methods to Estimate Quality of Institutions: Nations in Transition," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 16-29.
    7. Gaofeng Xu & Jian Liu, 2023. "Institutional Diversity or Isomorphism? Research on the Evolution of Collective-Owned Construction Land Marketization Reform since the 1990s—The Case of Shunde and Wujiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Shanshan Miao & Xueqin Zhu & Wim Heijman & Zengwei Xu & Qian Lu, 2022. "Deeds and Words: Farmers’ Attitude-Paradox in Collective Action for Small-Scale Irrigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Herman Geyer, 2024. "ZONING AND THE ‘RIGHT’ CITY: The Challenges of Zoning in the Global South and Possibilities for Unzoning Informality," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 877-893, September.
    10. Yufei Wang & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Jinzhao Wei, 2024. "Strategic Synergies: Unveiling the Interplay of Game Theory and Cultural Dynamics in a Globalized World," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Anita Yadav & Naqui Anwer & Krushna Mahapatra & Manish Kumar Shrivastava & Dilip Khatiwada, 2024. "Analyzing the Role of Polycentric Governance in Institutional Innovations: Insights from Urban Climate Governance in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Theesfeld, Insa & Dufhues, Tom & Buchenrieder, Gertrud, 2017. "The effects of rules on local political decision-making processes: How can rules facilitate participation?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 675-696.
    13. Marko M. Skoric & Nan Zhang & Chuanli Xia & Richard Ling, 2024. "The Digital Strategies and Efficacy of Environmental Movements in Hong Kong," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    14. Tanner, Andrew M. & Johnston, Alison L., 2017. "The Impact of Rural Electric Access on Deforestation Rates," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 174-185.
    15. Claude Menard & Gaetano Martino & Gustavo Magalhães Oliveira & Annie Royer & Paula Sarita Bigio Schnaider & Maria Sylvia Macchione Saes, 2024. "How is food safety regulation implemented? The key role of meso-institutions assessed through a cross-country comparison," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(4), pages 1045-1058, August.
    16. Boyka M. Stefanova, 2021. "Evolutionary institutionalism in Europe’s neighborhood post-enlargement: the European Neighborhood Policy brings geopolitics back in," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 329-346, September.
    17. Karim Ennouri & Slim Smaoui & Mohamed Ali Triki, 2021. "Detection of Urban and Environmental Changes via Remote Sensing," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1423-1437, December.
    18. Nima Narjabadifam & Javanshir Fouladvand & Mustafa Gül, 2023. "Critical Review on Community-Shared Solar—Advantages, Challenges, and Future Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Mercio Cerbaro & Stephen Morse & Richard Murphy & Jim Lynch & Geoffrey Griffiths, 2020. "Information from Earth Observation for the Management of Sustainable Land Use and Land Cover in Brazil: An Analysis of User Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Alvim, Augusto & Sanguinet, Eduardo, 2020. "Paris agreement on climate change and the possible impacts on Brazilian meat and dairy sectors," MPRA Paper 102997, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10411-:d:461160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.