IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8467-d427893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Methodology for Multi-Criteria Selection of Wind Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Shafiqur Rehman

    (Center for Engineering Research, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 34464, Saudi Arabia)

  • Salman A. Khan

    (College of Computing and Information Sciences, Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology, Karachi 75190, Pakistan)

  • Luai M. Alhems

    (Center for Engineering Research, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 34464, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The domain of renewable energy has seen tremendous growth in the past many years. This growth has shown optimism for a sustainable future and promises to lead the human race towards a cleaner and healthier environment. Wind energy, which is a vital part of this clean energy revolution, has received significant attention globally. To get benefit from wind energy, wind farms need to be developed with the highest efficiency so that the maximum energy can be harnessed. A key decision in this development process is selection of a turbine type that shows highest compatibility with the geographical and topographical features of the site where the turbines are to be installed. In practical terms, the turbine selection mechanism should consider several decision criteria. In many cases, these criteria are conflicting with each other. Furthermore, the choice and aspirations of the decision-maker who selects these turbines should be considered in the selection process and should be flexible. This paper presents a preliminary study on a rule-based turbine selection methodology which is based on the concepts of fuzzy logic. The proposed methodology analyzes several scenarios in conjunction with the turbine selection model. The applicability of the methodology is demonstrated via two test scenarios. Data from a real potential site in Saudi Arabia were used, and 17 turbines from different manufacturers and with rated capacities in range of 1.5–3 MW were evaluated. The results indicate that the proposed scheme is able to incorporate decision-maker’s aspirations and effectively reflects these aspirations in the turbine selection process.

Suggested Citation

  • Shafiqur Rehman & Salman A. Khan & Luai M. Alhems, 2020. "A Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Methodology for Multi-Criteria Selection of Wind Turbines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8467-:d:427893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper & R. O. Ferguson, 1955. "Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 138-151, January.
    2. Jung-Tae Lee & Hyun-Goo Kim & Yong-Heack Kang & Jin-Young Kim, 2019. "Determining the Optimized Hub Height of Wind Turbine Using the Wind Resource Map of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Perkin, Samuel & Garrett, Deon & Jensson, Pall, 2015. "Optimal wind turbine selection methodology: A case-study for Búrfell, Iceland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 165-172.
    4. Chowdhury, Souma & Zhang, Jie & Messac, Achille & Castillo, Luciano, 2013. "Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 273-282.
    5. Bertrand Mareschal & Jean Pierre Brans, 1990. "The PROMETHEE methods for MCDM: the PROMCALC, GAIA and BANK ADVISER software," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9337, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. A. Dinmohammadi & M. Shafiee, 2017. "Determination of the Most Suitable Technology Transfer Strategy for Wind Turbines Using an Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Decision Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Shafiqur Rehman & Salman A. Khan, 2016. "Fuzzy Logic Based Multi-Criteria Wind Turbine Selection Strategy—A Case Study of Qassim, Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Dong, Yao & Wang, Jianzhou & Jiang, He & Shi, Xiaomeng, 2013. "Intelligent optimized wind resource assessment and wind turbines selection in Huitengxile of Inner Mongolia, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 239-253.
    9. Saul Gass & Thomas Saaty, 1955. "The computational algorithm for the parametric objective function," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1‐2), pages 39-45, March.
    10. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    11. EL-Shimy, M., 2010. "Optimal site matching of wind turbine generator: Case study of the Gulf of Suez region in Egypt," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1870-1878.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alphan, H., 2021. "Modelling potential visibility of wind turbines: A geospatial approach for planning and impact mitigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. G. Olabi & Tabbi Wilberforce & Khaled Elsaid & Tareq Salameh & Enas Taha Sayed & Khaled Saleh Husain & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2021. "Selection Guidelines for Wind Energy Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-34, June.
    2. Nansheng Pang & Mengfan Nan & Qichen Meng & Siyang Zhao, 2021. "Selection of Wind Turbine Based on Fuzzy Analytic Network Process: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Shafiqur Rehman & Salman A. Khan, 2016. "Fuzzy Logic Based Multi-Criteria Wind Turbine Selection Strategy—A Case Study of Qassim, Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Xue, Jie & Yip, Tsz Leung & Wu, Bing & Wu, Chaozhong & van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., 2021. "A novel fuzzy Bayesian network-based MADM model for offshore wind turbine selection in busy waterways: An application to a case in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 897-917.
    5. Chen, Jincheng & Wang, Feng & Stelson, Kim A., 2018. "A mathematical approach to minimizing the cost of energy for large utility wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1413-1422.
    6. Ayman Al-Quraan & Bashar Al-Mhairat, 2022. "Intelligent Optimized Wind Turbine Cost Analysis for Different Wind Sites in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Máximo Méndez & Mariano Frutos & Fabio Miguel & Ricardo Aguasca-Colomo, 2020. "TOPSIS Decision on Approximate Pareto Fronts by Using Evolutionary Algorithms: Application to an Engineering Design Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Giallanza, A. & Porretto, M. & Cannizzaro, L. & Marannano, G., 2017. "Analysis of the maximization of wind turbine energy yield using a continuously variable transmission system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 481-486.
    9. Cengiz Kahraman & Sezi Cevik Onar & Basar Oztaysi, 2016. "A Comparison of Wind Energy Investment Alternatives Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Benefit/Cost Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Houda Alaya & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2020. "A multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for business sustainability analysis of small and medium sized enterprises," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 557-586, October.
    11. Soukissian, Takvor H. & Karathanasi, Flora E., 2017. "On the selection of bivariate parametric models for wind data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 280-304.
    12. Onar, Sezi Cevik & Oztaysi, Basar & Otay, İrem & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2015. "Multi-expert wind energy technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 274-285.
    13. Mateusz Piwowarski & Mariusz Borawski & Kesra Nermend, 2021. "The Problem of Non-Typical Objects in the Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of the Level of Renewable Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Arias-Rosales, Andrés & Osorio-Gómez, Gilberto, 2018. "Wind turbine selection method based on the statistical analysis of nominal specifications for estimating the cost of energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 980-998.
    15. Wang, Jianzhou & Hu, Jianming & Ma, Kailiang, 2016. "Wind speed probability distribution estimation and wind energy assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 881-899.
    16. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren, 2020. "Strategic Planning Based on Sustainability for Urban Transportation: An Application to Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Shafiqur Rehman & Md. Mahbub Alam & Luai M. Alhems & M. Mujahid Rafique, 2018. "Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade Design Methodologies for Efficiency Enhancement—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-34, February.
    18. Perkin, Samuel & Garrett, Deon & Jensson, Pall, 2015. "Optimal wind turbine selection methodology: A case-study for Búrfell, Iceland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 165-172.
    19. Mamdouh Abdulrahman & David Wood, 2019. "Wind Farm Layout Upgrade Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-25, June.
    20. Yongming Song & Jun Hu, 2017. "Vector similarity measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8467-:d:427893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.