IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i15p6271-d394291.html

Restoration of a Historic Building in Order to Improve Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving—Case Study—The Dining Room within the Žiča Monastery Property

Author

Listed:
  • Nenad Šekularac

    (Department of Architectural Technologies, University of Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73/II, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Jelena Ivanović-Šekularac

    (Department of Architectural Technologies, University of Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73/II, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Petrovski

    (Faculty of Architecture, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Boulevard Partizanski odredi 24, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia)

  • Nikola Macut

    (Department of Architectural Technologies, University of Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73/II, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Milan Radojević

    (Department of Architectural Technologies, University of Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73/II, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

A proper systematic approach to the restoration of historic buildings is crucial in the preservation of heritage buildings. This paper presents the unity between the restoration of a historic building and sustainability. The aim of the research is to establish an effective method for the restoration of historic buildings and their reuse and sustainable renovation in terms of energy efficiency, in accordance with modern needs and conservation requirements while maintaining the authentic appearance. The main method in the paper is the observation of a historic building during its restoration and exploitation, analysis and evaluation of the results achieved in improving energy efficiency and energy saving in the example of the building within the Žica Monastery in Serbia, a cultural monument of exceptional importance. The subject of the research is the Dining Room within the Žiča Monastery and the analysis of the restoration results in order to ensure energy refurbishment and cultural heritage enhancement. The research findings are recommendations for the restoration and adaptive re-use of historic buildings, in accordance with modern requirements for comfort and environmental protection. The greatest contribution of this paper is the practical verification of energy refurbishment of the restored historic building, the Dining Room, by applying the principles and measures of energy efficiency, maintaining the authentic appearance of the building, in accordance with the conservation requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Nenad Šekularac & Jelena Ivanović-Šekularac & Aleksandar Petrovski & Nikola Macut & Milan Radojević, 2020. "Restoration of a Historic Building in Order to Improve Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving—Case Study—The Dining Room within the Žiča Monastery Property," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6271-:d:394291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/15/6271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akkurt, G.G. & Aste, N. & Borderon, J. & Buda, A. & Calzolari, M. & Chung, D. & Costanzo, V. & Del Pero, C. & Evola, G. & Huerto-Cardenas, H.E. & Leonforte, F. & Lo Faro, A. & Lucchi, E. & Marletta, L, 2020. "Dynamic thermal and hygrometric simulation of historical buildings: Critical factors and possible solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Carmen Mª Muñoz-González & Ángel Luis León-Rodríguez & Rafael C. Suárez Medina & Catherine Teeling, 2018. "Hygrothermal Performance of Worship Spaces: Preservation, Comfort, and Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Nenad Šekularac & Nevena Debljović Ristić & Dušan Mijović & Vladica Cvetković & Slobodan Barišić & Jelena Ivanović-Šekularac, 2019. "The Use of Natural Stone as an Authentic Building Material for the Restoration of Historic Buildings in Order to Test Sustainable Refurbishment: Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Webb, Amanda L., 2017. "Energy retrofits in historic and traditional buildings: A review of problems and methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 748-759.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jolanta Dzwierzynska & Anna Prokop, 2022. "Reconstruction of Historic Monuments—A Dual Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Alessandro Lo Faro & Alessia Miceli, 2021. "New Life for Disused Religious Heritage: A Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Erman Berkay & Beser Oktay Vehbi, 2022. "Conservation Proposals for Monasteries in Karpas Peninsula, Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-34, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessia Buda & Ernst Jan de Place Hansen & Alexander Rieser & Emanuela Giancola & Valeria Natalina Pracchi & Sara Mauri & Valentina Marincioni & Virginia Gori & Kalliopi Fouseki & Cristina S. Polo Lóp, 2021. "Conservation-Compatible Retrofit Solutions in Historic Buildings: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Egusquiza, A. & Ginestet, S. & Espada, J.C. & Flores-Abascal, I. & Garcia-Gafaro, C. & Giraldo-Soto, C. & Claude, S. & Escadeillas, G., 2021. "Co-creation of local eco-rehabilitation strategies for energy improvement of historic urban areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Belén Onecha & Alicia Dotor & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "Beyond Cultural and Historic Values, Sustainability as a New Kind of Value for Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Mirco Andreotti & Dario Bottino-Leone & Marta Calzolari & Pietromaria Davoli & Luisa Dias Pereira & Elena Lucchi & Alexandra Troi, 2020. "Applied Research of the Hygrothermal Behaviour of an Internally Insulated Historic Wall without Vapour Barrier: In Situ Measurements and Dynamic Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Mariangela De Vita & Giulia Massari & Pierluigi De Berardinis, 2020. "Retrofit Methodology Based on Energy Simulation Modeling Applied for the Enhancement of a Historical Building in L’Aquila," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Joanna Ferdyn-Grygierek & Krzysztof Grygierek, 2019. "Proposed Strategies for Improving Poor Hygrothermal Conditions in Museum Exhibition Rooms and Their Impact on Energy Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Cho, Hyun Mi & Yun, Beom Yeol & Yang, Sungwoong & Wi, Seunghwan & Chang, Seong Jin & Kim, Sumin, 2020. "Optimal energy retrofit plan for conservation and sustainable use of historic campus building: Case of cultural property building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Muñoz González, C.Mª & León Rodríguez, A.L. & Suárez Medina, R. & Ruiz Jaramillo, J., 2020. "Effects of future climate change on the preservation of artworks, thermal comfort and energy consumption in historic buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Pierfrancesco Fiore & Enrico Sicignano & Giuseppe Donnarumma, 2020. "An AHP-Based Methodology for the Evaluation and Choice of Integrated Interventions on Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Agnieszka Leśniak & Monika Górka & Izabela Skrzypczak, 2021. "Barriers to BIM Implementation in Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Projects—The Polish Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Cho, Hyun Mi & Yang, Sungwoong & Wi, Seunghwan & Chang, Seong Jin & Kim, Sumin, 2020. "Hygrothermal and energy retrofit planning of masonry façade historic building used as museum and office: A cultural properties case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    12. Valentina Marincioni & Virginia Gori & Ernst Jan de Place Hansen & Daniel Herrera-Avellanosa & Sara Mauri & Emanuela Giancola & Aitziber Egusquiza & Alessia Buda & Eleonora Leonardi & Alexander Rieser, 2021. "How Can Scientific Literature Support Decision-Making in the Renovation of Historic Buildings? An Evidence-Based Approach for Improving the Performance of Walls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Luca Evangelisti & Edoardo De Cristo & Salvatore Monteleone & Claudia Guattari & Paola Gori & Ivan Pini & Tullio de Rubeis & Dario Ambrosini, 2025. "A New Customized Measurement System for a Non-Contact, Enhanced Thermometric Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Paweł Sokołowski & Grzegorz Nawalany & Tomasz Jakubowski & Ernest Popardowski & Vasyl Lopushniak & Atilgan Atilgan, 2022. "Numerical Analysis of Thermal Impact between the Cooling Facility and the Ground," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Kadri Keskküla & Tambet Aru & Mihkel Kiviste & Martti-Jaan Miljan, 2020. "Hygrothermal Analysis of Masonry Wall with Reed Boards as Interior Insulation System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-10, October.
    16. Václav Kočí & Jan Kočí & Jiří Maděra & Jaroslav Žák & Robert Černý, 2020. "Computational Prediction of Susceptibility to Biofilms Growth: Two-Dimensional Analysis of Critical Construction Details," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Anna Donarelli, 2025. "Zero‐Emission and Zero Demolition: Promoting Conservation Interests Through the Implementation of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    18. Cristina S. Polo López & Elena Lucchi & Eleonora Leonardi & Antonello Durante & Anne Schmidt & Roger Curtis, 2021. "Risk-Benefit Assessment Scheme for Renewable Solar Solutions in Traditional and Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, May.
    19. Henrik Engelbrecht Foldager & Rasmus Camillus Jeppesen & Muhyiddine Jradi, 2019. "DanRETRO: A Decision-Making Tool for Energy Retrofit Design and Assessment of Danish Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Amedeo Caprino & Filippo Lorenzoni & Laura Carnieletto & Leonardo Feletto & Michele De Carli & Francesca da Porto, 2021. "Integrated Seismic and Energy Retrofit Interventions on a URM Masonry Building: The Case Study of the Former Courthouse in Fabriano," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:15:p:6271-:d:394291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.