IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4384-d363492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Soil Properties and Organic Components in Infusions According to Different Aerial Appearances of Tea Plantations in Central Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Prapasiri Tongsiri

    (Department of Soil and Water Conservation, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
    Rubber Division, Department of Agriculture (DOA), Bangkok 10900, Thailand)

  • Wen-Yu Tseng

    (Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

  • Yuan Shen

    (Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

  • Hung-Yu Lai

    (Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
    Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture (IDCSA), National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

Abstract

The soil properties, climate, type of management, and fermentation process critically affect the productivity and quality of tea. In this study, tender tea leaves were collected from central Taiwan, and organic components in their infusions as well as physical and chemical soil properties differentiated using aerial photographs where good (G) and bad (B) growth exhibitions were determined. Eleven physical and chemical soil properties as well as five compounds in tea infusions were analyzed to determine the main factor that affects the growth of these tea trees. The Fleiss’ kappa statistic results revealed that the wet aggregate stability, pH, and exchangeable potassium content exhibit the most significant effect, with scores of 0.86, 0.64, and 0.62, respectively. Soil quality calculated using the mean weight diameter based on 11 soil properties revealed that ~67% of the total score of G is greater than that of B. Generally, contents of total polyphenols (51.67%) and catechins (51.76%) in the infusions of B were greater than those of G. In addition, significant positive correlations between the free amino acids content and soil properties, including pH and copper content, were observed. However, a negative correlation between the free amino acids and flavone contents and most of the soil properties was observed. The survey data set obtained from this study can provide useful information for the improved management of tea plantations.

Suggested Citation

  • Prapasiri Tongsiri & Wen-Yu Tseng & Yuan Shen & Hung-Yu Lai, 2020. "Comparison of Soil Properties and Organic Components in Infusions According to Different Aerial Appearances of Tea Plantations in Central Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4384-:d:363492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atanu Mukherjee & Rattan Lal, 2014. "Comparison of Soil Quality Index Using Three Methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Sadeeka Layomi Jayasinghe & Lalit Kumar & Janaki Sandamali, 2019. "Assessment of Potential Land Suitability for Tea ( Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in Sri Lanka Using a GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manorama Thapa & SUBHANKAR Gurung & Binghui He, 2022. "The Effects of Tea Plantation Upon the Soil Properties Based Upon the Comparative Study of India and China: A Meta – Analysis," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 309-322, 10-2022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed K. Abdel-Fattah & Elsayed Said Mohamed & Enas M. Wagdi & Sahar A. Shahin & Ali A. Aldosari & Rosa Lasaponara & Manal A. Alnaimy, 2021. "Quantitative Evaluation of Soil Quality Using Principal Component Analysis: The Case Study of El-Fayoum Depression Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Gourlay, Sydney & Kilic, Talip & Lobell, David B., 2019. "A new spin on an old debate: Errors in farmer-reported production and their implications for inverse scale - Productivity relationship in Uganda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Salman A. H. Selmy & Salah H. Abd Al-Aziz & Raimundo Jiménez-Ballesta & Francisco Jesús García-Navarro & Mohamed E. Fadl, 2021. "Soil Quality Assessment Using Multivariate Approaches: A Case Study of the Dakhla Oasis Arid Lands," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Collins-Sowah, Peron A. & Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2019. "Risk management and its implications on household incomes," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2019-05, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    5. Maurício R Cherubin & Douglas L Karlen & Carlos E P Cerri & André L C Franco & Cássio A Tormena & Christian A Davies & Carlos C Cerri, 2016. "Soil Quality Indexing Strategies for Evaluating Sugarcane Expansion in Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Sung Soo Kim & Chong Kyu Lee & Hag Mo Kang & Soo Im Choi & So Hui Jeon & Hyun Kim, 2021. "Land Suitability Evaluation for Wild-Simulated Ginseng Cultivation in South Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, January.
    7. An T. N. Dang & Lalit Kumar & Michael Reid, 2020. "Modelling the Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Rice Cultivation in Mekong Delta, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Arenas-Calle, Laura N. & Ramirez-Villegas, Julian & Whitfield, Stephen & Challinor, Andrew J., 2021. "Design of a Soil-based Climate-Smartness Index (SCSI) using the trend and variability of yields and soil organic carbon," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Jie Xu & Suri Guga & Guangzhi Rong & Dao Riao & Xingpeng Liu & Kaiwei Li & Jiquan Zhang, 2021. "Estimation of Frost Hazard for Tea Tree in Zhejiang Province Based on Machine Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, June.
    10. S. Abdul Rahaman & S. Aruchamy, 2022. "Land Suitability Evaluation of Tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) Plantation in Kallar Watershed of Nilgiri Bioreserve, India," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Xiaopeng Shi & Xin Song & Guibin Zhao & Qifeng Yang & Lynette K. Abbott & Fengmin Li, 2022. "Manure Application Is the Key to Improving Soil Quality of New Terraces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Mostafa A. Abdellatif & Ahmed A. El Baroudy & Muhammad Arshad & Esawy K. Mahmoud & Ahmed M. Saleh & Farahat S. Moghanm & Kamal H. Shaltout & Ebrahem M. Eid & Mohamed S. Shokr, 2021. "A GIS-Based Approach for the Quantitative Assessment of Soil Quality and Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Mehrnoosh Taherizadeh & Arman Niknam & Thong Nguyen-Huy & Gábor Mezősi & Reza Sarli, 2023. "Flash flood-risk areas zoning using integration of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, GIS-based analytic network process and satellite-derived information," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 2309-2335, September.
    14. Ying Han & Yongjian He & Zhuoran Liang & Guoping Shi & Xiaochen Zhu & Xinfa Qiu, 2023. "Risk Assessment and Application of Tea Frost Hazard in Hangzhou City Based on the Random Forest Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Zeyu Shi & Zhongke Bai & Donggang Guo & Meijing Chen, 2021. "Develop a Soil Quality Index to Study the Results of Black Locust on Soil Quality below Different Allocation Patterns," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Mateusz Ciski & Krzysztof Rząsa & Marek Ogryzek, 2019. "Use of GIS Tools in Sustainable Heritage Management—The Importance of Data Generalization in Spatial Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Park, Dojin, 2021. "The Valuation of Soil Health Improvements and Ecosystem Services among Crop Producers in the U.S," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314032, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Pushpanjali & Josily Samuel & Prabhat Kumar Pankaj & Konda Srinivas Reddy & Karunakaran Karthikeyan & Ardha Gopala Krishna Reddy & Jagriti Rohit & Kotha Sammi Reddy & Vinod Kumar Singh, 2023. "Fodder Grass Strips: An Affordable Technology for Sustainable Rainfed Agriculture in India," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    19. David B Lobell & George Azzari & Marshall Burke & Sydney Gourlay & Zhenong Jin & Talip Kilic & Siobhan Murray, 2020. "Eyes in the Sky, Boots on the Ground: Assessing Satellite‐ and Ground‐Based Approaches to Crop Yield Measurement and Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(1), pages 202-219, January.
    20. Shouqiang Yin & Jing Li & Jiaxin Liang & Kejing Jia & Zhen Yang & Yuan Wang, 2020. "Optimization of the Weighted Linear Combination Method for Agricultural Land Suitability Evaluation Considering Current Land Use and Regional Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4384-:d:363492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.