IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2522-d227446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa R. Johnson

    (School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Kate Beard

    (School of Computing and Information Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Damian C. Brady

    (School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Carrie J. Byron

    (School of Marine Programs, University of New England, Biddeford, ME 04005, USA)

  • Caitlin Cleaver

    (Ecology and Environmental Sciences Program, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Kevin Duffy

    (Department of Communication and Journalism, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Nicholas Keeney

    (School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Melissa Kimble

    (School of Computing and Information Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Molly Miller

    (Ecology and Environmental Sciences Program, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Shane Moeykens

    (Maine EPSCoR Office, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Mario Teisl

    (School of Economics, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • G. Peter van Walsum

    (Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Jing Yuan

    (School of Computing and Information Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

Abstract

Aquaculture has been responsible for an impressive growth in the global supply of seafood. As of 2016, more than half of all global seafood production comes from aquaculture. To meet future global seafood demands, there is need and opportunity to expand marine aquaculture production in ways that are both socially and ecologically sustainable. This requires integrating biophysical, social, and engineering sciences. Such interdisciplinary research is difficult due to the complexity and multi-scale aspects of marine aquaculture and inherent challenges researchers face working across disciplines. To this end, we developed a framework based on Elinor Ostrom’s social–ecological system framework (SESF) to guide interdisciplinary research on marine aquaculture. We first present the framework and the social–ecological system variables relevant to research on marine aquaculture and then illustrate one application of this framework to interdisciplinary research underway in Maine, the largest producer of marine aquaculture products in the United States. We use the framework to compare oyster aquaculture in two study regions, with a focus on factors influencing the social and biophysical carrying capacity. We conclude that the flexibility provided by the SESF is well suited to inform interdisciplinary research on marine aquaculture, especially comparative, cross-case analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa R. Johnson & Kate Beard & Damian C. Brady & Carrie J. Byron & Caitlin Cleaver & Kevin Duffy & Nicholas Keeney & Melissa Kimble & Molly Miller & Shane Moeykens & Mario Teisl & G. Peter van Walsu, 2019. "A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2522-:d:227446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2522/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2522/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byron, Carrie & Bengtson, David & Costa-Pierce, Barry & Calanni, John, 2011. "Integrating science into management: Ecological carrying capacity of bivalve shellfish aquaculture," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 363-370, May.
    2. Marshall, Joan, 2001. "Landlords, leaseholders & sweat equity: changing property regimes in aquaculture," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 335-352, September.
    3. Gibbs, Mark T., 2009. "Implementation barriers to establishing a sustainable coastal aquaculture sector," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 83-89, January.
    4. Deana Pennington, 2016. "A conceptual model for knowledge integration in interdisciplinary teams: orchestrating individual learning and group processes," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 300-312, June.
    5. Rosamond L. Naylor & Rebecca J. Goldburg & Jurgenne H. Primavera & Nils Kautsky & Malcolm C. M. Beveridge & Jason Clay & Carl Folke & Jane Lubchenco & Harold Mooney & Max Troell, 2000. "Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6790), pages 1017-1024, June.
    6. Geret S. DePiper & Douglas W. Lipton & Romuald N. Lipcius, 2017. "Valuing Ecosystem Services: Oysters, Denitrification, and Nutrient Trading Programs," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 1-20.
    7. Achim Schlüter & Sarah Wise & Kathleen Schwerdtner Mánez & Gabriela Weber De Morais & Marion Glaser, 2013. "Institutional Change, Sustainability and the Sea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Halley E Froehlich & Rebecca R Gentry & Michael B Rust & Dietmar Grimm & Benjamin S Halpern, 2017. "Public Perceptions of Aquaculture: Evaluating Spatiotemporal Patterns of Sentiment around the World," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Edella Schlager & Elinor Ostrom, 1992. "Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(3), pages 249-262.
    10. Byron, Carrie & Link, Jason & Costa-Pierce, Barry & Bengtson, David, 2011. "Calculating ecological carrying capacity of shellfish aquaculture using mass-balance modeling: Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(10), pages 1743-1755.
    11. S. E. Lester & J. M. Stevens & R. R. Gentry & C. V. Kappel & T. W. Bell & C. J. Costello & S. D. Gaines & D. A. Kiefer & C. C. Maue & J. E. Rensel & R. D. Simons & L. Washburn & C. White, 2018. "Marine spatial planning makes room for offshore aquaculture in crowded coastal waters," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. K. Birthisel & B. A. Eastman & A. R. Soucy & M. Paul & R. S. Clements & A. White & M. P. Acquafredda & W. Errickson & L-H. Zhu & M. C. Allen & S. A. Mills & G. Dimmig & K. M. Dittmer, 2020. "Convergence, continuity, and community: a framework for enabling emerging leaders to build climate solutions in agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 2181-2195, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barrett, Luke T. & Theuerkauf, Seth J. & Rose, Julie M. & Alleway, Heidi K. & Bricker, Suzanne B. & Parker, Matt & Petrolia, Daniel R. & Jones, Robert C., 2022. "Sustainable growth of non-fed aquaculture can generate valuable ecosystem benefits," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Yi-ping Fang & Fu-biao Zhu & Shu-hua Yi & Xiao-ping Qiu & Yong-jiang Ding, 2021. "Ecological carrying capacity of alpine grassland in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau based on the structural dynamics method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12550-12578, August.
    3. Kluger, Lotta C. & Taylor, Marc H. & Mendo, Jaime & Tam, Jorge & Wolff, Matthias, 2016. "Carrying capacity simulations as a tool for ecosystem-based management of a scallop aquaculture system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 331(C), pages 44-55.
    4. Yuxi Zhao & Xingguo Liu & Ming Lu & Runfeng Zhou & Zhaoyun Sun & Shuwen Xiao, 2022. "Evaluation of Trophic Structure and Energy Flow in a Pelteobagrus fulvidraco Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Pete, Romain & Guyondet, Thomas & Bec, Beatrice & Derolez, Valérie & Cesmat, Ludovic & Lagarde, Franck & Pouvreau, Stéphane & Fiandrino, Annie & Richard, Marion, 2020. "A box-model of carrying capacity of the Thau lagoon in the context of ecological status regulations and sustainable shellfish cultures," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 426(C).
    6. José Ruiz-Chico & José M. Biedma-Ferrer & Antonio R. Peña-Sánchez & Mercedes Jiménez-García, 2020. "Social Acceptance of Aquaculture in Spain: An Instrument to Achieve Sustainability for Society," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Haque, A.B.M. Mahfuzul & Visser, Leontine E. & Dey, Madan M., 2011. "Institutional Arrangements in Seasonal Floodplain Management under Community-based Aquaculture in Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Bergstén, Sabina & Stjernström, Olof & Pettersson, Örjan, 2018. "Experiences and emotions among private forest owners versus public interests: Why ownership matters," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 801-811.
    9. Deslatte, Aaron & Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna & Tavares, António F. & Ślawska, Justyna & Karsznia, Izabela & Łukomska, Julita, 2022. "Land use institutions and social-ecological systems: A spatial analysis of local landscape changes in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. David Aubin & Frédéric Varone, 2013. "Getting Access to Water: Property Rights or Public Policy Strategies?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 154-167, February.
    11. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    12. Gani, Azmat & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2014. "Modeling governance and water pollution using the institutional ecological economic framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 363-372.
    13. Rakotonarivo, O. Sarobidy & Bredahl Jacobsen, Jette & Poudyal, Mahesh & Rasoamanana, Alexandra & Hockley, Neal, 2018. "Estimating welfare impacts where property rights are contested: methodological and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 71-83.
    14. Ariel E. Turcios & Jutta Papenbrock, 2014. "Sustainable Treatment of Aquaculture Effluents—What Can We Learn from the Past for the Future?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Rémy Herrera & Poeura Tetoe, 2013. "The Papua Niugini Paradox. Land property archaism and Modernity of peasant resistance ?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00786274, HAL.
    16. Juszczyk, Juliusz, 2015. "Światowy rynek łososia hodowlanego – stan i perspektywy," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 15(30), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2018. "From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 437-456, March.
    18. Emilio Salas-Leiton & Ana Costa & Vanessa Neves & Joana Soares & Adriano Bordalo & Sérgia Costa-Dias, 2022. "Sustainability of the Portuguese North-Western Fishing Activity in the Face of the Recently Implemented Maritime Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Kassis, Grâce & Bertrand, Nathalie, 2022. "Institutional changes in farmland governance emerging from a collective land preservation procedure upholding local food projects: Evidence from a French case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    20. Leibbrandt, Andreas & Lynham, John, 2018. "Does the allocation of property rights matter in the commons?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 201-217.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2522-:d:227446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.