IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1579-d214176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements for the Sustainable Development of the Socio-Economy in China: A Multi-Analytic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jianrong Yao

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Xiasha Higher Education Zone, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China)

  • Yanqin Pan

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Xiasha Higher Education Zone, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China)

  • Shuiqing Yang

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Xiasha Higher Education Zone, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China)

  • Yuangao Chen

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Xiasha Higher Education Zone, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China)

  • Yixiao Li

    (School of Information Management and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Xiasha Higher Education Zone, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China)

Abstract

Identifying financial statement fraud activities is very important for the sustainable development of a socio-economy, especially in China’s emerging capital market. Although many scholars have paid attention to fraud detection in recent years, they have rarely focused on both financial and non-financial predictors by using a multi-analytic approach. The present study detected financial statement fraud activities based on 17 financial and 7 non-financial variables by using six data mining techniques including support vector machine (SVM), classification and regression tree (CART), back propagation neural network (BP-NN), logistic regression (LR), Bayes classifier (Bayes) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). Specifically, the research period was from 2008 to 2017 and the sample is companies listed on the Shanghai stock exchange and Shenzhen stock exchange, with a total of 536 companies of which 134 companies were allegedly involved in fraud. The stepwise regression and principal component analysis (PCA) were also adopted for reducing variable dimensionality. The experimental results show that the SVM data mining technique has the highest accuracy across all conditions, and after using stepwise regression, 13 significant variables were screened and the classification accuracy of almost all data mining techniques was improved. However, the first 16 principal components transformed by PCA did not yield better classification results. Therefore, the combination of SVM and the stepwise regression dimensionality reduction method was found to be a good model for detecting fraudulent financial statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianrong Yao & Yanqin Pan & Shuiqing Yang & Yuangao Chen & Yixiao Li, 2019. "Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements for the Sustainable Development of the Socio-Economy in China: A Multi-Analytic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1579-:d:214176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/6/1579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Chengwei & Chan, Yixiang & Alam Kazmi, Syed Hasnain & Fu, Hao, 2015. "Financial Fraud Detection Model Based on Random Forest," MPRA Paper 65404, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Chyan-long Jan, 2018. "An Effective Financial Statements Fraud Detection Model for the Sustainable Development of Financial Markets: Evidence from Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md Jahidur Rahman & Hongtao Zhu, 2023. "Predicting accounting fraud using imbalanced ensemble learning classifiers – evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3455-3486, September.
    2. KiJeon Nam & Pouya Ifaei & Sungku Heo & Gahee Rhee & Seungchul Lee & ChangKyoo Yoo, 2019. "An Efficient Burst Detection and Isolation Monitoring System for Water Distribution Networks Using Multivariate Statistical Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Dimitrios Kydros & Michail Pazarskis & Athanasia Karakitsiou, 2022. "A framework for identifying the falsified financial statements using network textual analysis: a general model and the Greek example," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 513-527, September.
    4. Xiangzhou Chen & Zhi Long, 2023. "E-Commerce Enterprises Financial Risk Prediction Based on FA-PSO-LSTM Neural Network Deep Learning Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Papík, Mário & Papíková, Lenka, 2022. "Detecting accounting fraud in companies reporting under US GAAP through data mining," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bosiljka Srebro & Bojan Mavrenski & Vesna Bogojević Arsić & Snežana Knežević & Marko Milašinović & Jovan Travica, 2021. "Bankruptcy Risk Prediction in Ensuring the Sustainable Operation of Agriculture Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Sander Noels & Simon De Ridder & Sébastien Viaene & Tijl De Bie, 2023. "An efficient graph‐based peer selection method for financial statements," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 120-136, July.
    3. Ashfaque Banbhan & Xinsheng Cheng & Nizam Ud Din, 2018. "Financially Qualified Members in an Upper Echelon and Their Relationship with Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Der-Jang Chi & Chien-Chou Chu, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence in Corporate Sustainability: Using LSTM and GRU for Going Concern Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Huosong Xia & Xiang Wei & Wuyue An & Zuopeng Justin Zhang & Zelin Sun, 2021. "Design of electronic-commerce recommendation systems based on outlier mining," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 295-311, June.
    6. Nouhaila Innan & Muhammad Al-Zafar Khan & Mohamed Bennai, 2023. "Financial Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Quantum Machine Learning Models," Papers 2308.05237, arXiv.org.
    7. Lucia Svabova & Lucia Michalkova & Marek Durica & Elvira Nica, 2020. "Business Failure Prediction for Slovak Small and Medium-Sized Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Badal Khan & Muhammad Aqil & Syed Hasnain Alam Kazmi & Syed Imran Zaman, 2023. "Day‐of‐the‐week effect and market liquidity: A comparative study from emerging stock markets of Asia†," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 544-561, January.
    9. Hyun Sik Sim & Hae In Kim & Jae Joon Ahn, 2019. "Is Deep Learning for Image Recognition Applicable to Stock Market Prediction?," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, February.
    10. Craja, Patricia & Kim, Alisa & Lessmann, Stefan, 2020. "Deep Learning application for fraud detection in financial statements," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2020-007, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    11. Gil, Cohen, 2022. "Intraday Trading of Precious Metals Futures Using Algorithmic Systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat & Kazmi, Syed Hasnain Alam & Zaman, Syed Imran, 2021. "Application of gray DEMATEL-ANP in green-strategic sourcing," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Muhammad Asad Ali & Muhammad Aqil & Syed Hasnain Alam Kazmi & Syed Imran Zaman, 2023. "Evaluation of risk adjusted performance of mutual funds in an emerging market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1436-1449, April.
    14. Gil Cohen, 2023. "Intraday algorithmic trading strategies for cryptocurrencies," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 395-409, July.
    15. Sonika Gupta & Sushil Kumar Mehta, 2024. "Feature Selection for Dimension Reduction of Financial Data for Detection of Financial Statement Frauds in Context to Indian Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 323-348, April.
    16. Dimitrios Kydros & Michail Pazarskis & Athanasia Karakitsiou, 2022. "A framework for identifying the falsified financial statements using network textual analysis: a general model and the Greek example," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 513-527, September.
    17. Chyan-Long Jan, 2021. "Detection of Financial Statement Fraud Using Deep Learning for Sustainable Development of Capital Markets under Information Asymmetry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Der-Jang Chi & Zong-De Shen, 2022. "Using Hybrid Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies for Sustainability in Going-Concern Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    19. António Samagaio & Tiago Andrade Diogo, 2022. "Effect of Computer Assisted Audit Tools on Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Papík, Mário & Papíková, Lenka, 2022. "Detecting accounting fraud in companies reporting under US GAAP through data mining," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:6:p:1579-:d:214176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.