IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6336-d285984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Analysis of Curb-Park Violations and Their Relationship with Points of Interest: A Case Study of Tehran, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Javad Koohpayma

    (Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran)

  • Amir Tahooni

    (Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran)

  • Mohammadreza Jelokhani-Niaraki

    (Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417466191, Iran)

  • Jamal Jokar Arsanjani

    (Geoinformatics Research Group, Department of Planning and Development, Aalborg University Copenhagen, DK-2450 Copenhagen, Denmark)

Abstract

Car parking is a challenging part of urban transportation and traffic violations cause many problems for citizens. Studies have shown that there is a direct relationship between vehicle parking violations and urban places. In this study, we investigated the spatial distribution of vehicle violations in a region of Tehran, Iran, that is suffering from a heavy traffic load and heavily polluted air. Although there are two dissimilar urban segregations in the north and south of the study area, in both of the regions, about 70% of all curb-parks are legal, while the remaining are illegal. However, our analysis indicates a dissimilar pattern of car parking violations. Additionally, spatial analysis reveals a direct relationship between some POIs (Point of interests) and the occurrence of car park violations. For example, the number of vehicle park violations around the hospitals is more than the average of the study area. However, the number of park violations around the universities is less than the average. Our results also show that POIs have an impact radius that leads to violations occurring in that area. For example, the influence range of a hospital on the creation of car park violations was estimated at 125 meters. Our presented approach along with the discussed findings and conclusions can be useful to an extensive range of stakeholders, including urban planners, traffic police departments, local municipalities, law enforcement agencies and environmentalists, to have a better perspective of infrastructure planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Javad Koohpayma & Amir Tahooni & Mohammadreza Jelokhani-Niaraki & Jamal Jokar Arsanjani, 2019. "Spatial Analysis of Curb-Park Violations and Their Relationship with Points of Interest: A Case Study of Tehran, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6336-:d:285984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Quanquan & Conway, Alison & Cheng, Jialei, 2017. "Parking for residential delivery in New York City: Regulations and behavior," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-60.
    2. Carolina Ajeng & Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim, 2018. "Analyzing on-Street Parking Duration and Demand in a Metropolitan City of a Developing Country: A Case Study of Yogyakarta City, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Stefan Gössling & Marcel Schröder & Philipp Späth & Tim Freytag, 2016. "Urban Space Distribution and Sustainable Transport," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 659-679, September.
    4. Shoup, Donald C., 1995. "Cashing out Employer-Paid Parking: An Opportunity to Reduce Minimum Parking Requirements," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4jg417cw, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kadkhodaei, Masoud & Shad, Rouzbeh & Ziaee, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Affecting factors of double parking violations on urban trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 80-88.
    2. Hailing Xu & Jianghong Zhu & Zhanqi Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Pattern of Urban Block Development Based on POI Analysis: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nevland, Erik A. & Gingerich, Kevin & Park, Peter Y., 2020. "A data-driven systematic approach for identifying and classifying long-haul truck parking locations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 48-59.
    2. Romain Petiot, 2004. "Parking enforcement and travel demand management," Post-Print hal-02422664, HAL.
    3. Fehn, Fabian & Engelhardt, Roman & Dandl, Florian & Bogenberger, Klaus & Busch, Fritz, 2023. "Integrating parcel deliveries into a ride-pooling service—An agent-based simulation study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Hudde, Ansgar, 2022. "The unequal cycling boom in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Schaefer, Jaclyn S. & Figliozzi, Miguel A., 2021. "Spatial accessibility and equity analysis of Amazon parcel lockers facilities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Christina Pakusch & Gunnar Stevens & Alexander Boden & Paul Bossauer, 2018. "Unintended Effects of Autonomous Driving: A Study on Mobility Preferences in the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Cruz-Daraviña, Paola Andrea & Bocarejo Suescún, Juan Pablo, 2021. "Freight operations in city centers: A land use conflict in urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Clélia Lopez & Chuan-Lin Zhao & Stéphane Magniol & Nicolas Chiabaut & Ludovic Leclercq, 2019. "Microscopic Simulation of Cruising for Parking of Trucks as a Measure to Manage Freight Loading Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Kim, Woojung & Wang, Xiaokun Cara, 2022. "The adoption of alternative delivery locations in New York City: Who and how far?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 127-140.
    10. Ranjbari, Andisheh & Diehl, Caleb & Dalla Chiara, Giacomo & Goodchild, Anne, 2023. "Do parcel lockers reduce delivery times? Evidence from the field," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Olus Inan, Murat & Inci, Eren & Robin Lindsey, C., 2019. "Spillover parking," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 197-228.
    12. Thumm, Alex Jürgen & Perl, Anthony, 2020. "Puzzling over parking: Assessing the transitional parking requirement in Vancouver, British Columbia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 85-101.
    13. Luqi Wang, 2018. "Barriers to Implementing Pro-Cycling Policies: A Case Study of Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Inci, Eren, 2015. "A review of the economics of parking," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 50-63.
    15. Najmi, Ali & Bostanara, Maryam & Gu, Ziyuan & Rashidi, Taha H., 2021. "On-street parking management and pricing policies: An evaluation from a system enhancement perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 128-151.
    16. Sijing Liu & Jiuping Xu & Xiaoyuan Shi & Guoqi Li & Dinglong Liu, 2018. "Sustainable Distribution Organization Based on the Supply–Demand Coordination in Large Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, August.
    17. Ramirez-Rios, Diana G. & Kalahasthi, Lokesh Kumar & Holguín-Veras, José, 2023. "On-street parking for freight, services, and e-commerce traffic in US cities: A simulation model incorporating demand and duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Weinberger, Rachel, 2012. "Death by a thousand curb-cuts: Evidence on the effect of minimum parking requirements on the choice to drive," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 93-102.
    19. Fabusuyi, Tayo & Hampshire, Robert C., 2018. "Rethinking performance based parking pricing: A case study of SFpark," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 90-101.
    20. Dahlen Silva & Dávid Földes & Csaba Csiszár, 2021. "Autonomous Vehicle Use and Urban Space Transformation: A Scenario Building and Analysing Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6336-:d:285984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.