IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5542-d274324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renovation Construction Process Scheduling for Long-Term Performance of Buildings: An Application Case of University Campus

Author

Listed:
  • Fang-Jye Shiue

    (Grauate Institute of Architecture & Sustainable Planning, National Ilan University, Yilan City 260, Taiwan)

  • Meng-Cong Zheng

    (Department of Industrial Design, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Hsin-Yun Lee

    (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Akhmad F.K. Khitam

    (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Pei-Ying Li

    (Department of Industrial Design, Tatung University, Taipei City 104, Taiwan)

Abstract

Renovation construction is employed for maintaining the long-term performance of buildings. For the occupants, the building users, renovation contributes to the acceptable levels of convenience and quality of the buildings. However, if the operation continues during the renovation for an area containing several buildings, such as a university campus, the impacts on the occupants are unavoidable. The complicated schedule plan is needed due to the various types of buildings and types of renovation under limited resources. The goal of this study is to build a model that can help the planners to make the renovation schedule plan. Taking a university campus as an example, the occupants’ convenience rate and the long-term quality of the building are analyzed in this paper. Based on the key attributes of building renovation, this study proposes a model integrating the genetic algorithm and simulation to provide the optimal schedule plan to the planners. The model is demonstrated by an application case of a university campus of 11 buildings remaining in operation. It helps the university maintain a good level of long-term performance of buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang-Jye Shiue & Meng-Cong Zheng & Hsin-Yun Lee & Akhmad F.K. Khitam & Pei-Ying Li, 2019. "Renovation Construction Process Scheduling for Long-Term Performance of Buildings: An Application Case of University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5542-:d:274324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    2. Abolfazl Farahani & Holger Wallbaum & Jan-Olof Dalenbäck, 2019. "Optimized maintenance and renovation scheduling in multifamily buildings – a systematic approach based on condition state and life cycle cost of building components," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 139-155, March.
    3. Ya Xu & Kelei Xue & Yuquan Du, 2018. "Berth Scheduling Problem Considering Traffic Limitations in the Navigation Channel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Aliakbar Kamari & Stefan Jensen & Maria Leonhard Christensen & Steffen Petersen & Poul Henning Kirkegaard, 2018. "A hybrid Decision Support System for Generation of Holistic Renovation Scenarios—Cases of Energy Consumption, Investment Cost, and Thermal Indoor Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dar-Li Yang & Wen-Hung Kuo, 2019. "Minimizing Makespan in A Two-Machine Flowshop Problem with Processing Time Linearly Dependent on Job Waiting Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Yuri Seki & Ayokunle Olubunmi Olanipekun & Monty Sutrisna, 2022. "End-User Stakeholder Engagement in Refurbishment Design in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Beata Nowogońska & Magdalena Mielczarek, 2021. "Renovation Management Method in Neglected Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Shu-Shun Liu & Muhammad Faizal Ardhiansyah Arifin, 2021. "Preventive Maintenance Model for National School Buildings in Indonesia Using a Constraint Programming Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Guorui Chen & Li Cheng & Foyuan Li, 2022. "Integrating Sustainability and Users’ Demands in the Retrofit of a University Campus in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Fabian Dunke & Stefan Nickel, 2023. "A matheuristic for customized multi-level multi-criteria university timetabling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(2), pages 1313-1348, September.
    7. Beata Nowogońska, 2020. "Consequences of Abandoning Renovation: Case Study—Neglected Industrial Heritage Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasilii Erokhin & Dmitry Endovitsky & Alexey Bobryshev & Natalia Kulagina & Anna Ivolga, 2019. "Management Accounting Change as a Sustainable Economic Development Strategy during Pre-Recession and Recession Periods: Evidence from Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Prabhu Sivabalan & Peter Booth & Teemu Malmi & David A. Brown, 2009. "An exploratory study of operational reasons to budget," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(4), pages 849-871, December.
    3. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Arnold, Markus C. & Gillenkirch, Robert M., 2015. "Using negotiated budgets for planning and performance evaluation: An experimental study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    7. Saymon Ricardo Oliveira Sousa & Wesley Vieira Silva & Claudimar Pereira Veiga & Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini, 2020. "Theoretical background of innovation in services in small and medium-sized enterprises: literature mapping," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Allan Hansen, 2011. "Relating performative and ostensive management accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 108-138, June.
    9. Antonio Artino & Riccardo Caponetto & Gianpiero Evola & Giuseppe Margani & Edoardo Michele Marino & Emanuele Murgano, 2020. "Decision Support System for the Sustainable Seismic and Energy Renovation of Buildings: Methodological Layout," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Shu-Shun Liu & Muhammad Faizal Ardhiansyah Arifin, 2021. "Preventive Maintenance Model for National School Buildings in Indonesia Using a Constraint Programming Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Laitinen, Erkki K., 2014. "Influence of cost accounting change on performance of manufacturing firms," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 230-240.
    12. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Anderson, Shannon W. & Nair, Sujay & Jiang, Yile (Anson), 2021. "Manager ‘growth mindset’ and resource management practices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Aapo Länsiluoto & Elina Varamäki & Erkki K. Laitinen & Anmari Viljamaa & Juha Tall, 2015. "Management Control Systems in Small Business Transfers — A Resource-Based View," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 449-471, December.
    14. Reheul, Anne-Mie & Jorissen, Ann, 2010. "Do CEOs Shape Planning, Control and Performance Evaluation Systems in SMEs?," Working Papers 2010/26, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    15. Ibrahim Bader Alharbi & Rossilah Jamil & Nik Hasnaa Nik Mahmood & Awaluddin Mohamed Shaharoun, 2023. "Transformational Leadership’s Impact on Organizational Innovation: The Mediating Role of Management Control System," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1418-1433, December.
    16. Aliakbar Kamari & Ashwin Paari & Henrik Øien Torvund, 2020. "BIM-Enabled Virtual Reality (VR) for Sustainability Life Cycle and Cost Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Bhimani, Alnoor & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Soonawalla, Kazbi, 2018. "A study of the linkages between rolling budget forms, uncertainty and strategy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 306-323.
    18. Johansson, Tobias, 2018. "Testing for control system interdependence with structural equation modeling: Conceptual developments and evidence on the levers of control framework," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 47-62.
    19. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-315, April.
    20. Davila, Tony, 2005. "An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: formalizing human resources in small growing firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 223-248, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5542-:d:274324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.