IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4672-d188890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of the Transnational Power Grid Interconnection Project Based on Combination Weighting and TOPSIS Grey Projection Method

Author

Listed:
  • Jinying Li

    (Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Jiaming Xu

    (Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Xin Tan

    (Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of the global economy, the interconnection of power grids has become an objective law and a trend of the power industry development. The implementation of power grid interconnection projects, especially transnational power grid interconnection projects, will bring us substantial benefits. To demonstrate these benefits comprehensively, we designed a comprehensive evaluation index system with multiple international engineering characteristics. The index system takes the influencing factors of economic, social, environmental and technical benefits into account. In order to improve the rigidity and power of weight determination, we proposed the least squares method which combines the order relation method and the factor analysis method. Furthermore, the limitation of the one-way evaluation was effectively overcome by combining TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution), grey relation analysis method and vector projection method. In addition, we adjusted the potential impact of the time on evaluation by using the quadratic weighted algorithm, so that we can dynamically evaluate the comprehensive benefits. Finally, we verified the established index system and evaluation model through an example of eight different investment plans of a transnational high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission project. Altogether, results from this paper will provide a guidance reference and decision support for the grid corporation to invest in transnational power grid interconnection projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinying Li & Jiaming Xu & Xin Tan, 2018. "Dynamic Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of the Transnational Power Grid Interconnection Project Based on Combination Weighting and TOPSIS Grey Projection Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4672-:d:188890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Fahua & Zheng, Youfei & Guo, Xulin & Wang, Sheng, 2005. "Environmental impacts and benefits of regional power grid interconnections for China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(14), pages 1797-1805, September.
    2. Qunli Wu & Chenyang Peng, 2016. "Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of the Power Distribution Network Planning Project Based on Improved IAHP and Multi-Level Extension Assessment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Salvatore Favuzza & Mariano Giuseppe Ippolito & Fabio Massaro & Liliana Mineo & Rossano Musca & Gaetano Zizzo, 2018. "New Energy Corridors in the Euro-Mediterranean Area: The Pivotal Role of Sicily," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Jinying Li & Fan Wu & Jinchao Li & Yunqi Zhao, 2017. "Research on Risk Evaluation of Transnational Power Networking Projects Based on the Matter-Element Extension Theory and Granular Computing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Feng, Fei & Song, Guohui & Shen, Laihong & Xiao, Jun, 2017. "Environmental benefits analysis based on life cycle assessment of rice straw-based synthetic natural gas in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 341-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunqi Zhao & Jing Xiang & Jiaming Xu & Jinying Li & Ning Zhang, 2019. "Study on the Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Transnational Power Networking Projects Based on Multi-Project Stakeholder Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Lindner, Soeren & Liu, Zhu & Guan, Dabo & Geng, Yong & Li, Xin, 2013. "CO2 emissions from China’s power sector at the provincial level: Consumption versus production perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 164-172.
    3. Yanshan Yu & Jin Yang & Bin Chen, 2012. "The Smart Grids in China—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Singlitico, Alessandro & Goggins, Jamie & Monaghan, Rory F.D., 2019. "The role of life cycle assessment in the sustainable transition to a decarbonised gas network through green gas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 16-28.
    5. Cherry, Christopher & Weinert, Jonathan & Ma, Chaktan, 2007. "The Environmental Impacts of Electric Bikes in Chinese Cities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4zg3b4d6, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Su, Shenshen & Fang, Xuekun & Zhao, Jinyang & Hu, Jianxin, 2017. "Spatiotemporal characteristics of consumption based CO2 emissions from China’s power sector," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 156-163.
    7. Ardolino, Filomena & Lodato, Concetta & Astrup, Thomas F. & Arena, Umberto, 2018. "Energy recovery from plastic and biomass waste by means of fluidized bed gasification: A life cycle inventory model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 299-314.
    8. Siwen Zhang & Haiming Gu & Jing Qian & Wioletta Raróg-Pilecka & Yuan Wang & Qijing Wu & Hao Zhao, 2023. "Techno-Economic Assessment of High-Safety and Cost-Effective Syngas Produced by O 2 -Enriched Air Gasification with 40–70% O 2 Purity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Xiaoling Wang & Hongling Yu & Peng Lv & Cheng Wang & Jun Zhang & Jia Yu, 2019. "Seepage Safety Assessment of Concrete Gravity Dam Based on Matter-Element Extension Model and FDA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Jorge, Raquel S. & Hertwich, Edgar G., 2013. "Environmental evaluation of power transmission in Norway," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 513-520.
    11. Jinying Li & Fan Wu & Jinchao Li & Yunqi Zhao, 2017. "Research on Risk Evaluation of Transnational Power Networking Projects Based on the Matter-Element Extension Theory and Granular Computing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Kim, Hyo-Jin & Lim, Seul-Ye & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2017. "Is the Korean public willing to pay for a decentralized generation source? The case of natural gas-based combined heat and power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 125-131.
    13. Bo, Zeng & Shaojie, Ouyang & Jianhua, Zhang & Hui, Shi & Geng, Wu & Ming, Zeng, 2015. "An analysis of previous blackouts in the world: Lessons for China׳s power industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1151-1163.
    14. Yao, Dong & Xu, Zaifeng & Qi, Huaqing & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong & Cui, Peizhe, 2022. "Carbon footprint and water footprint analysis of generating synthetic natural gas from biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 780-789.
    15. Taro Ohdoko & Satoru Komatsu & Shinji Kaneko, 2013. "Residential preferences for stable electricity supply and a reduction in air pollution risk: a benefit transfer study using choice modeling in China," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 15(3), pages 309-328, July.
    16. Siti Norliyana Harun & Marlia Mohd Hanafiah & Noorashikin Md Noor, 2022. "Rice Straw Utilisation for Bioenergy Production: A Brief Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Ye, Bin & Jiang, JingJing & Li, Changsheng & Miao, Lixin & Tang, Jie, 2017. "Quantification and driving force analysis of provincial-level carbon emissions in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 223-238.
    19. Liu, Beibei & Wu, Qiaoran & Wang, Feng & Zhang, Bing, 2019. "Is straw return-to-field always beneficial? Evidence from an integrated cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 393-402.
    20. Cui, Peizhe & Zhang, Jifu & Liu, Yangyang & Zhou, Yaru & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis of clean fuel vehicle life cycle environment under multiple fuel scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4672-:d:188890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.