IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p4217-d183126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Seat and Aisle Interferences Affecting the Overall Airplane Boarding Time? An Agent-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia Delcea

    (Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Liviu-Adrian Cotfas

    (Department of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Liliana Crăciun

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policies, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Anca Gabriela Molanescu

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policies, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010552 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Seat and aisle interferences are assumed to be linked with a prolonged boarding time along with several other aspects related to airplane boarding such as: luggage handling, luggage distribution inside the cabin, number of passengers, passengers’ physique characteristics, group behavior, seat selection, aircraft occupancy, aircraft design, etc. Based on these assumptions, a series of proposed boarding methods, underlying their efficiency starting from the absence or limited presence of these types of interferences, are proposed. The present paper aims to analyze whether the different types of seat or aisle interferences do matter for the overall boarding time by considering 24 boarding methods proposed in the literature. A series of specific elements related to interferences, such as: the average waiting time, the average number of interferences based on their types, and the average number of interference-affected passengers, have been considered. Also, the presence of multiple interferences in different parts of the aircraft has been analyzed in order to offer a complete picture of the considered situation. An agent-based model in NetLogo 6.0.4, fed with values form field trials within the literature is created and used for simulations, which enables the agents to act like real passengers involved in an airplane boarding process.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Liliana Crăciun & Anca Gabriela Molanescu, 2018. "Are Seat and Aisle Interferences Affecting the Overall Airplane Boarding Time? An Agent-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4217-:d:183126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4217/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/4217/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Notomista, Gennaro & Selvaggio, Mario & Sbrizzi, Fiorentina & Di Maio, Gabriella & Grazioso, Stanislao & Botsch, Michael, 2016. "A fast airplane boarding strategy using online seat assignment based on passenger classification," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 140-149.
    2. Eitan Bachmat & Daniel Berend & Luba Sapir & Steven Skiena & Natan Stolyarov, 2009. "Analysis of Airplane Boarding Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 499-513, April.
    3. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani & Alhalabi, Wael, 2014. "Modeling framework for optimal evacuation of large-scale crowded pedestrian facilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1105-1118.
    4. Van Landeghem, H. & Beuselinck, A., 2002. "Reducing passenger boarding time in airplanes: A simulation based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 294-308, October.
    5. Ha, Vi & Lykotrafitis, George, 2012. "Agent-based modeling of a multi-room multi-floor building emergency evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(8), pages 2740-2751.
    6. Nyquist, David C. & McFadden, Kathleen L., 2008. "A study of the airline boarding problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 197-204.
    7. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Ramona Paun, 2018. "Agent-Based Evaluation of the Airplane Boarding Strategies’ Efficiency and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Bazargan, Massoud, 2007. "A linear programming approach for aircraft boarding strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 394-411, November.
    9. Mo Gao & Leishan Zhou & Yongjun Chen, 2016. "An Alternative Approach for High Speed Railway Carrying Capacity Calculation Based on Multiagent Simulation," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-10, November.
    10. Zeineddine, Hassan, 2017. "A dynamically optimized aircraft boarding strategy," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 144-151.
    11. Milne, R. John & Salari, Mostafa, 2016. "Optimization of assigning passengers to seats on airplanes based on their carry-on luggage," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 104-110.
    12. Steffen, Jason H., 2008. "Optimal boarding method for airline passengers," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 146-150.
    13. Ren, Xinhui & Xu, Xiaobing, 2018. "Experimental analyses of airplane boarding based on interference classification," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 55-63.
    14. Tang, Tie-Qiao & Yang, Shao-Peng & Ou, Hui & Chen, Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "An aircraft boarding model accounting for group behavior," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 182-189.
    15. Dossetti, V. & Bouzat, S. & Kuperman, M.N., 2017. "Behavioral effects in room evacuation models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 193-202.
    16. Milne, R. John & Kelly, Alexander R., 2014. "A new method for boarding passengers onto an airplane," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 93-100.
    17. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Nora Chiriță & Ionuț Nica, 2018. "A Two-Door Airplane Boarding Approach When Using Apron Buses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Menkes H. L. van den Briel & J. René Villalobos & Gary L. Hogg & Tim Lindemann & Anthony V. Mulé, 2005. "America West Airlines Develops Efficient Boarding Strategies," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 191-201, June.
    19. Steffen, Jason H. & Hotchkiss, Jon, 2012. "Experimental test of airplane boarding methods," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 64-67.
    20. Qiang, Sheng-Jie & Jia, Bin & Xie, Dong-Fan & Gao, Zi-You, 2014. "Reducing airplane boarding time by accounting for passengers' individual properties: A simulation based on cellular automaton," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 42-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Mostafa Salari & R. John Milne, 2018. "Investigating the Random Seat Boarding Method without Seat Assignments with Common Boarding Practices Using an Agent-Based Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Salari, Mostafa & Milne, R. John & Delcea, Camelia & Kattan, Lina & Cotfas, Liviu-Adrian, 2020. "Social distancing in airplane seat assignments," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Zeineddine, Hassan, 2021. "Reducing the effect of passengers’ non-compliance with aircraft boarding rules," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Milne, R. John & Delcea, Camelia & Cotfas, Liviu-Adrian & Salari, Mostafa, 2019. "New methods for two-door airplane boarding using apron buses," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Nora Chiriță & Ionuț Nica, 2018. "A Two-Door Airplane Boarding Approach When Using Apron Buses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Salari, Mostafa & Milne, R. John & Delcea, Camelia & Kattan, Lina & Cotfas, Liviu-Adrian, 2020. "Social distancing in airplane seat assignments," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Mostafa Salari & R. John Milne, 2018. "Investigating the Random Seat Boarding Method without Seat Assignments with Common Boarding Practices Using an Agent-Based Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Milne, R. John & Delcea, Camelia & Cotfas, Liviu-Adrian & Salari, Mostafa, 2019. "New methods for two-door airplane boarding using apron buses," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Ren, Xinhui & Zhou, Xiyu & Xu, Xiaobing, 2020. "A new model of luggage storage time while boarding an airplane: An experimental test," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Michael Schultz & Michael Schmidt, 2018. "Advancements in Passenger Processes at Airports from Aircraft Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Ren, Xinhui & Xu, Xiaobing, 2018. "Experimental analyses of airplane boarding based on interference classification," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 55-63.
    8. Michael Schultz & Jörg Fuchte, 2020. "Evaluation of Aircraft Boarding Scenarios Considering Reduced Transmissions Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Tang, Tie-Qiao & Yang, Shao-Peng & Ou, Hui & Chen, Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2018. "An aircraft boarding model accounting for group behavior," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 182-189.
    10. Camelia Delcea & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas & Ramona Paun, 2018. "Agent-Based Evaluation of the Airplane Boarding Strategies’ Efficiency and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Zeineddine, Hassan, 2021. "Reducing the effect of passengers’ non-compliance with aircraft boarding rules," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Wittmann, Jürgen, 2019. "Customer-oriented optimization of the airplane boarding process," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 31-39.
    13. Schultz, Michael & Soolaki, Majid & Salari, Mostafa & Bakhshian, Elnaz, 2023. "A combined optimization–simulation approach for modified outside-in boarding under COVID-19 regulations including limited baggage compartment capacities," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Schultz, Michael & Evler, Jan & Asadi, Ehsan & Preis, Henning & Fricke, Hartmut & Wu, Cheng-Lung, 2020. "Future aircraft turnaround operations considering post-pandemic requirements," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    15. Zeineddine, Hassan, 2017. "A dynamically optimized aircraft boarding strategy," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 144-151.
    16. Qiang, Sheng-Jie & Jia, Bin & Jiang, Rui & Huang, Qing-Xia & Radwan, Essam & Gao, Zi-You & Wang, Yu-Qing, 2016. "Symmetrical design of strategy-pairs for enplaning and deplaning an airplane," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 52-60.
    17. Hutter, Leonie & Jaehn, Florian & Neumann, Simone, 2019. "Influencing factors on airplane boarding times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 177-190.
    18. Kisiel, Tomasz, 2020. "Resilience of passenger boarding strategies to priority fares offered by airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Jaehn, Florian & Neumann, Simone, 2015. "Airplane boarding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 339-359.
    20. Picchi Scardaoni, Marco & Magnacca, Fabio & Massai, Andrea & Cipolla, Vittorio, 2021. "Aircraft turnaround time estimation in early design phases: Simulation tools development and application to the case of box-wing architecture," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:4217-:d:183126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.