IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2017i1p37-d124274.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Evaluate Smart Cities’ Construction? A Comparison of Chinese Smart City Evaluation Methods Based on PSF

Author

Listed:
  • Hongbo Shi

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China)

  • Sang-Bing Tsai

    (Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan 528402, China)

  • Xiaowei Lin

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China)

  • Tianyi Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of smart cities in the world, research relating to smart city evaluation has become a new research hotspot in academia. However, there are general problems of cognitive deprivation, lack of planning experience, and low level of coordination in smart cities construction. It is necessary for us to develop a set of scientific, reasonable, and effective evaluation index systems and evaluation models to analyze the development degree of urban wisdom. Based on the theory of the urban system, we established a comprehensive evaluation index system for urban intelligent development based on the people-oriented, city-system, and resources-flow (PSF) evaluation model. According to the characteristics of the comprehensive evaluation index system of urban intelligent development, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) combined with the experts’ opinions determine the index weight of this system. We adopted the neural network model to construct the corresponding comprehensive evaluation model to characterize the non-linear characteristics of the comprehensive evaluation indexes system, thus to quantitatively quantify the comprehensive evaluation indexes of urban intelligent development. Finally, we used the AHP, AHP-BP (Back Propagation), and AHP-ELM (Extreme Learning Machine) models to evaluate the intelligent development level of 151 cities in China, and compared them from the perspective of model accuracy and time cost. The final simulation results show that the AHP-ELM model is the best evaluation model.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongbo Shi & Sang-Bing Tsai & Xiaowei Lin & Tianyi Zhang, 2017. "How to Evaluate Smart Cities’ Construction? A Comparison of Chinese Smart City Evaluation Methods Based on PSF," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:37-:d:124274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lombardi, P. & Giordano, S. & Caragliu, A. & Del Bo, C., 2011. "An advanced triple-helix network model for smart cities performance," Serie Research Memoranda 0045, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Renata Paola Dameri & Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux (ed.), 2014. "Smart City," Progress in IS, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-06160-3, July.
    3. Lazaroiu, George Cristian & Roscia, Mariacristina, 2012. "Definition methodology for the smart cities model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 326-332.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhou, Tao & Wang, Di, 2020. "Tracking the evolution processes of smart cities in China by assessing performance and efficiency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Sławomira Hajduk, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of Smart Cities on the Example of the Polish Cities," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Yi Tao & Shihang Wang & Jiang Wu & Mingsong Zhao & Zhen Yang, 2022. "Logistic Network Construction and Economic Linkage Development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: An Analysis Based on Spatial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhou, Tao, 2022. "Understanding the dynamic relationship between smart city implementation and urban sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Guijun Li & Yongsheng Wang & Jie Luo & Yulong Li, 2018. "Evaluation on Construction Level of Smart City: An Empirical Study from Twenty Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Santis, Roberta & Fasano, Alessandra & Mignolli, Nadia & Villa, Anna, 2014. "Smart city: fact and fiction," MPRA Paper 54536, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Roberta De Santis & Alessandra Fasano & Nadia Mignolli & Anna Villa, 2015. "A primer on city "smartness" measurement," RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 34-51.
    3. Haidar, Ahmed M.A. & Muttaqi, Kashem & Sutanto, Danny, 2015. "Smart Grid and its future perspectives in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1375-1389.
    4. Shahid Nawaz Khan & Syed Ali Abbas Kazmi & Abdullah Altamimi & Zafar A. Khan & Mohammed A. Alghassab, 2022. "Smart Distribution Mechanisms—Part I: From the Perspectives of Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-109, December.
    5. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    6. Sabina Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, 2022. "The Scandinavian Third Way as a Proposal for Sustainable Smart City Development—A Case Study of Aarhus City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Joshua Olusegun FAYOMI, 2016. "The place of the virtual workplaces in developing smart urban centres," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 196-205, November.
    8. Galán-García, José L. & Aguilera-Venegas, Gabriel & Galán-García, María Á. & Rodríguez-Cielos, Pedro, 2015. "A new Probabilistic Extension of Dijkstra’s Algorithm to simulate more realistic traffic flow in a smart city," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 267(C), pages 780-789.
    9. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Amel ATTOUR & Marc-Hubert DEPRET, 2013. "TIC, soutenabilité et stratégie territoriale des villes durables : le cas des EcoCités en France [ICT, Sustainability and Territorial Strategy of Sustainable Cities: The EcoCities in France]," Working Papers 36, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    11. Thanh Nguyen, Phong & Anh Nguyen, Thu & Huynh Tat Tran, Thang, 2021. "Barrier Factors Affecting Development of Intelligent Transport System Projects," MPRA Paper 112006, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Dec 2021.
    12. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    13. Vieira, Fabiana C. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Govindan, Kannan & Ferreira, Neuza C.M.Q.F. & Banaitis, Audrius, 2022. "Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Oleg Golubchikov & Mary J. Thornbush, 2022. "Smart Cities as Hybrid Spaces of Governance: Beyond the Hard/Soft Dichotomy in Cyber-Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    15. Magdalena Grebosz-Krawczyk, 2021. "Place branding (r)evolution: the management of the smart city’s brand," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 93-104, March.
    16. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    17. Nielsen, Brita Fladvad & Baer, Daniela & Lindkvist, Carmel, 2019. "Identifying and supporting exploratory and exploitative models of innovation in municipal urban planning; key challenges from seven Norwegian energy ambitious neighborhood pilots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 142-153.
    18. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2018. "Measuring the Performance in Creative Cities: Proposal of a Multidimensional Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak, 2022. "Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Mehtap ÇAKMAK BARSBAY & M. Kemal OKTEM, 2019. "Can we use waste generation as a smart indicator?," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7, pages 51-64, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2017:i:1:p:37-:d:124274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.