IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i4p89-d1113681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Nothing Gets Realised Anyway’: Adolescents’ Experience of Co-Creating Health Promotion Measures in Municipalities in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Mari Sylte

    (Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Monica Lillefjell

    (Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Bodil Elisabeth Valstad Aasan

    (HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, 7600 Levanger, Norway)

  • Kirsti Sarheim Anthun

    (Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
    Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to explore how adolescents experience co-creating health promotion measures in four municipalities in Norway. We applied a qualitative design with group interviews ( n = 9) among forty-nine adolescents participating in projects related to ‘Program for Public Health Work in Municipalities’ (2017–2027). Additionally, participatory observation of project activities was performed in two municipalities. We conducted a data-driven thematic analysis to analyse the data. The most prominent finding was that the adolescents often expressed feelings of resignation and dissatisfaction. Furthermore, we identified four underlying reasons behind the resignation and dissatisfaction. These were related to long project duration, the experience of not having an influence on the outcome, promises not being kept and lack of information and continuity in their participation. Essential features for meaningful participation were not present, and the findings suggest that the municipalities had limited success in facilitating participation that adolescents perceived as meaningful. The findings indicate that despite good intentions and policies supporting children’s participation, effort placed on implementing such policies in practice is still needed. This study adds knowledge regarding important factors to consider when involving young people in co-creating measures to avoid unintended effects such as disempowering adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Mari Sylte & Monica Lillefjell & Bodil Elisabeth Valstad Aasan & Kirsti Sarheim Anthun, 2023. "‘Nothing Gets Realised Anyway’: Adolescents’ Experience of Co-Creating Health Promotion Measures in Municipalities in Norway," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:89-:d:1113681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/4/89/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/4/89/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger A. Hart, 1992. "Children's Participation: From tokenism to citizenship," Papers inness92/6, Innocenti Essay.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berit Skauge & Anita Skårstad Storhaug & Edgar Marthinsen, 2021. "The What, Why and How of Child Participation—A Review of the Conceptualization of “Child Participation” in Child Welfare," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Dena Arya & Matt Henn, 2021. "COVID-ized Ethnography: Challenges and Opportunities for Young Environmental Activists and Researchers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Mona Treude & Ralf Schüle & Hans Haake, 2022. "Smart Sustainable Cities—Case Study Südwestfalen Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Richard Peter Bailey & Suria Angit, 2022. "Conceptualising Inclusion and Participation in the Promotion of Healthy Lifestyles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Richard Maclure, 2017. "Youth Reflexivity as Participatory Research in Senegal: A Field Study of Reciprocal Learning and Incremental Transformations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 251-261.
    6. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Anna Massons-Ribas & M. Àngels Balsells & Neus Cortada, 2021. "The Participation of Children and Adolescents in the Protection System: The Case of the Spanish Legislation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Duramy, Benedetta Faedi & Gal, Tali, 2020. "Understanding and implementing child participation: Lessons from the Global South," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Tritter, Jonathan Quetzal & McCallum, Alison, 2006. "The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 156-168, April.
    10. Matthew Morton & Paul Montgomery, 2010. "PROTOCOL: Youth empowerment programs for improving self‐efficacy and self‐esteem of adolescents," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 1-38.
    11. Nir, Tal & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2016. "The framed right to participate in municipal youth councils and its educational impact," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 174-183.
    12. Harriet Thew & Lucie Middlemiss & Jouni Paavola, 2022. "“You Need a Month’s Holiday Just to Get over It!” Exploring Young People’s Lived Experiences of the UN Climate Change Negotiations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Marta Estellés & Francisco José Amo & Jesús Romero, 2021. "The Consensus on Citizenship Education Purposes in Teacher Education," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Gerdts-Andresen, Tina, 2021. "A scoping review of when and how a child’s view is weighted in decision-making processes in law proceedings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Sollis, Kate & Yap, Mandy & Campbell, Paul & Biddle, Nicholas, 2022. "Conceptualisations of wellbeing and quality of life: A systematic review of participatory studies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Gal, Tali, 2017. "An ecological model of child and youth participation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 57-64.
    17. Ruff, Saralyn C. & Harrison, Kristi, 2020. "“Ask Me What I Want”: Community-based participatory research to explore transition-age foster Youth’s use of support services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Twum-Danso Imoh, Afua & Okyere, Samuel, 2020. "Towards a more holistic understanding of child participation: Foregrounding the experiences of children in Ghana and Nigeria," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Marcus Bhargava & Lee Jerome, 2020. "Training Teachers for and through Citizenship: Learning from Citizenship Experiences," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2016. "Children's participation in national policymaking: “You're so adorable, adorable, adorable! I'm speechless; so much fun!”," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 105-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:89-:d:1113681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.