IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i2p69-d792188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradox of Brexit and the Consequences of Taking Back Control

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Agu Igwe

    (Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

Abstract

Memorable events of the 21st century that will be rightly or wrongly be remembered includes the global financial crisis of 2007/08, the election of Mr Donald Trump as President of the United States of America, and Brexit (the United Kingdom (UK) voting to leave the European Union) in 2016. Others include the emergence of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, and the war between Russia and Ukraine. Since 2016, Brexit has continued to dominate global politics. Conceptually, this article explores the Brexit dilemma, the formalization of Brexit agreements, and the post-Brexit impact on the economy and society. How did Brexit happen? What are the underlying causes of Brexit? Is Brexit connected to Euroscepticism and populism? By evaluating these contexts, important issues and debates can be reconciled to advance knowledge on Brexit, UK politics, the regional political system, and the rise of populism. This article is currently relevant since it coincides with an obvious upsurge in interest in the post-Brexit Global Britain.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Agu Igwe, 2022. "The Paradox of Brexit and the Consequences of Taking Back Control," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:69-:d:792188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/2/69/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/2/69/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Organ, 2019. "Legal Regulation of Campaign Deliberation: Lessons from Brexit," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 268-277.
    2. John Gastil & Robert Richards, 2013. "Making Direct Democracy Deliberative through Random Assemblies," Politics & Society, , vol. 41(2), pages 253-281, June.
    3. Sara B. Hobolt, 2018. "Brexit and the 2017 UK General Election," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(S1), pages 39-50, September.
    4. Magnus Feldmann & Glenn Morgan, 2021. "Brexit and British Business Elites: Business Power and Noisy Politics," Politics & Society, , vol. 49(1), pages 107-131, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Rico Motos, 2019. "‘Let the Citizens Fix This Mess!’ Podemos’ Claim for Participatory Democracy in Spain," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 187-197.
    2. Hoicka, Christina E. & Lowitzsch, Jens & Brisbois, Marie Claire & Kumar, Ankit & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2021. "Implementing a just renewable energy transition: Policy advice for transposing the new European rules for renewable energy communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Alpa Shah, 2021. "What if We Selected our Leaders by Lottery? Democracy by Sortition, Liberal Elections and Communist Revolutionaries," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(4), pages 687-728, July.
    4. Kim Strandberg & Kim Backström & Janne Berg & Thomas Karv, 2021. "Democratically Sustainable Local Development? The Outcomes of Mixed Deliberation on a Municipal Merger on Participants’ Social Trust, Political Trust, and Political Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Todd Donovan, 2019. "The Promise and Perils of Direct Democracy: An Introduction," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 169-172.
    6. Sofia Vasilopoulou, 2020. "Brexit and the 2019 EP Election in the UK," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(S1), pages 80-90, September.
    7. Sallai, Dorottya & Schnyder, Gerhard & Kinderman, Daniel & Nölke, Andreas, 2023. "The antecedents of MNC political risk and uncertainty under right-wing populist governments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118668, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Sanskriti Menon & Janette Hartz-Karp, 2019. "Linking Traditional ‘Organic’ and ‘Induced’ Public Participation with Deliberative Democracy: Experiments in Pune, India," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 13(2), pages 193-214, September.
    9. Su-Min & Alexandru, 2022. "Do Labels Polarise? Theory and Evidence from the Brexit Referendum," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2227, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Cristina Gualdani & Shruti Sinha, 2023. "Identification in Discrete Choice Models with Imperfect Information," Working Papers 949, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    11. Miguel Won & Jorge M. Fernandes, 2022. "Analyzing Twitter networks using graph embeddings: an application to the British case," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 253-263, May.
    12. Ank Michels & Harmen Binnema, 2018. "Deepening and Connecting Democratic Processes. The Opportunities and Pitfalls of Mini-Publics in Renewing Democracy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Simon Pek, 2019. "Rekindling Union Democracy Through the Use of Sortition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1033-1051, April.
    14. Sorace, Miriam & Hobolt, Sara, 2020. "A tale of two peoples: motivated reasoning in the aftermath of the Brexit vote," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105106, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Nyberg, Daniel & Murray, John, 2023. "Corporate populism: How corporations construct and represent ‘the people’ in political contestations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Harri Raisio & Pirkko Vartiainen, 2015. "Accelerating the public’s learning curve on wicked policy issues: results from deliberative forums on euthanasia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 339-361, September.
    17. Ologunebi, John, 2023. "The marketing strategy to increase Gen Z and Millennials' usability of Asda's website: A case study of ASDA Uk," MPRA Paper 119417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Anatol Itten & Niek Mouter, 2022. "When Digital Mass Participation Meets Citizen Deliberation: Combining Mini- and Maxi-Publics in Climate Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:69-:d:792188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.