IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i4p202-d1370668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Different Dimensions of Loneliness among Adults Living with Chronic Diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Dijana Babić

    (Magdalena-Clinic for Cardiovascular Diseases, Ljudevita Gaja 2, 49217 Krapinske Toplice, Croatia
    Department of Nursing, Catholic University of Croatia, Ilica 242, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Snježana Benko Meštrović

    (Physiotherapy Department, Special Hospital for Pulmonary Diseases, Rockefellerova 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
    Faculty of Health Studies, Viktora Cara Emina 5, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
    Department of Physiotherapy, University North, 104. Brigade 3, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia)

  • Želimir Bertić

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Studies, Viktora Cara Emina 5, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
    Department of Nursing, The Polytechnic of Ivanić Grad, Moslavačka 10, 10310 Ivanić-Grad, Croatia)

  • Milan Milošević

    (Department for Occupational and Environmental Health, Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Rockefellerova 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Gordana Kamenečki

    (Community Health Centre Krapina, Krapinsko-Zagorska County, Mirka Crkvenca 1, 49000 Krapina, Croatia)

Abstract

Background : Loneliness has become a growing public health problem. Adult people who live with chronic health problems often experience more severe consequences of this condition. The purpose of this research is to determine the level of loneliness and differences in dimensions of loneliness in adults living with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Methods : The study was conducted in the Magdalena Clinic for Cardiovascular Diseases. The selected sample consisted of a group of patients admitted for short-term hospital treatment. The data were collected using the 11-item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS). Differences in outcomes with respect to gender, educational level and marital, work and living status, as well as medical diagnoses of the participants, were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test or the Mann–Whitney U test. Spearman’s rho coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the independent variables and the total score on different categories of loneliness. Results : A moderate level of loneliness (SD = 3.53; M = 3.0) was determined in almost half of the participants (N = 52; 49.1%). A statistically significant positive correlation was confirmed in the relationship between the emotional dimension of loneliness and the gender of the participants. The participants that had a lower education level showed a higher level of emotional loneliness, but also a higher overall level of loneliness. The age of the participants correlated negatively with the level of social loneliness (rho = −0.029). Conclusions : Loneliness is present among adults living with cardiovascular diseases in different dimensions and intensity. Although the connection between loneliness and health outcomes needs to be further investigated, the negative impact of this psychosocial problem on cardiovascular health cannot be ignored.

Suggested Citation

  • Dijana Babić & Snježana Benko Meštrović & Želimir Bertić & Milan Milošević & Gordana Kamenečki, 2024. "Assessment of Different Dimensions of Loneliness among Adults Living with Chronic Diseases," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:202-:d:1370668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/4/202/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/4/202/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:202-:d:1370668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.