IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i3p137-d1348586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crafts and Their Social Imaginary: How Technological Development Shapes the Future of the Crafts Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Ingrid Kofler

    (Faculty of Design and Arts, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, BZ, Italy)

  • Maximilian Walder

    (Eurac Research, 39100 Bolzano, BZ, Italy)

Abstract

The crafts sector, traditionally characterized by its adherence to heritage and small-scale familial enterprises, confronts an array of unprecedented challenges stemming from rapid technological advancement, globalization, climate change, and shifting demographics. This article presents a pioneering investigation into the profound and transformative effects of digitalization on the crafts sector, offering novel insights into the future trajectory of this industry. Through an explorative approach, we critically examine and interrogate the social imaginary underpinning the crafts sector, shedding light on the intricate interplay between tradition and innovation. Leveraging an inter- and transdisciplinary framework, our research brings together academics, experts, and practitioners from diverse regions in Italy and Austria to explore the nexus of digitalization and craft futures. We introduce three future scenarios for the crafts sector, each delineating varying degrees of digitalization and their potential implications. Employing a mixed-method approach encompassing expert interviews, a Delphi survey, focus groups, and scenario development, our study offers a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted landscape of craft futures. Furthermore, through the visualization of these scenarios, we provide a tangible platform for envisioning and engaging with the myriad possibilities that lie ahead. By synthesizing innovative methodologies from future studies and social imaginaries with a specific focus on the crafts sector, our research offers a robust analytical framework for navigating the complex dynamics of digitalization and envisioning transformative futures. This paper not only illuminates the disruptive forces unleashed by digitalization but also provides strategic insights to inform future decision-making processes within the crafts sector and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingrid Kofler & Maximilian Walder, 2024. "Crafts and Their Social Imaginary: How Technological Development Shapes the Future of the Crafts Sector," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:137-:d:1348586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/3/137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Cooke, 2004. "Regional knowledge capabilities, embeddedness of firms and industry organisation: Bioscience megacentres and economic geography," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 625-641, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nichola J. Lowe, 2007. "Job Creation and the Knowledge Economy: Lessons From North Carolina's Life Science Manufacturing Initiative," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 21(4), pages 339-353, November.
    2. Philip Cooke, 2004. "The Molecular Biology Revolution and the Rise of Bioscience Megacentres in North America and Europe," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(2), pages 161-177, April.
    3. Papaioannou, Theo & Watkins, Andrew & Mugwagwa, Julius & Kale, Dinar, 2016. "To Lobby or to Partner? Investigating the Shifting Political Strategies of Biopharmaceutical Industry Associations in Innovation Systems of South Africa and India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 66-79.
    4. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl & Joshua von Gabain, 2006. "Clusterentwicklung und -politik im Biotechnologiesektor Wien im Kontext internationaler Erfahrungen," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2006_02, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    5. Schwartz Dafna & Bar-El Raphael & Malul Miki, 2008. "A Joint Virtual Advanced Technology Incubator - A New Pattern of Israeli-Palestinian Economic Cooperation," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Acosta, Manuel & Coronado, Daniel & Martínez, M. Ángeles, 2012. "Spatial differences in the quality of university patenting: Do regions matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 692-703.
    7. Dominik Sikorski & Paweł Brezdeń, 2021. "Contemporary Processes of Concentration and Specialization of Industrial Activity in Post-Socialist States as Illustrated by the Case of Wrocław and Its Suburbs (Poland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Gohar Nuhoff-Isakhanyan & Emiel F.M. Wubben & S.W.F. Omta, 2016. "Sustainability Benefits and Challenges of Inter-Organizational Collaboration in Bio-Based Business: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Philip Cooke & Dafna Schwartz, 2008. "Regional Knowledge Economies: An Eu‐Uk And Israel Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(2), pages 178-192, April.
    10. Ubyrajara B. Dal Bello & Carla Susana da Encarnacao Marques & Octávio Sacramento, 2022. "(In)migration and entrepreneurship in rural areas: a systematic literature review," Revista de Estudios Regionales, Universidades Públicas de Andalucía, vol. 3, pages 153-185.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:137-:d:1348586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.