IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i3p110-d765504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combating Ageism through Adult Education and Learning

Author

Listed:
  • António Fragoso

    (Research Centre on Adult Education and Community Intervention (CEAD), Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e Socials, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

  • Josélia Fonseca

    (Research Centre on Adult Education and Community Intervention (CEAD), Universidade dos Açores, R. da Mãe de Deus, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal)

Abstract

The demographic data and projections show that the world is ageing at a high pace and that this has transversal consequences to society. The available data on ageism show that it constitutes the most prevalent form of discrimination in Europe. Whilst this seems logical because ageism, potentially, affects everybody (unlike sexism or racism), public debates on the phenomenon are rare. The awareness of people of its importance is minimal, the resources and investigation devoted to understanding it are relatively small and the initiatives towards combating ageism are not enough. There is a mismatch between the dimension of the phenomenon and the attention that we have given it. Ageism has various negative consequences for the older adults themselves; for the institutions at large (but especially for the working world institutions) and for countries. In a fast-ageing world that will witness structural changes in age groups, ageism is a complex phenomenon that needs to be counteracted. So far, in Europe, combating ageism through law and public policy seems to have produced poor results. However, the literature shows that adult education and learning can provide very effective means to improve the mutual knowledge between generations, combat myths and prejudice and deconstruct age-based stereotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • António Fragoso & Josélia Fonseca, 2022. "Combating Ageism through Adult Education and Learning," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:110-:d:765504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justyna Stypinska & Konrad Turek, 2017. "Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 49-61, March.
    2. Dariusz Piotrowski, 2014. "The financial aspect of intergenerational solidarity from the point of view of the senior," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 3(2), pages 111-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rafael Zapata-Lamana & Felipe Poblete-Valderrama & Andres Ledezma-Dames & Patricia Pavón-León & Ana María Leiva & María Trinidad Fuentes-Alvarez & Igor Cigarroa & María Antonia Parra-Rizo, 2022. "Health, Functional Ability, and Environmental Quality as Predictors of Life Satisfaction in Physically Active Older Adults," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerstin Nilsson & Emma Nilsson, 2022. "Managers’ Attitudes to Different Action Proposals in the Direction to Extended Working Life: A Cross-Sectional Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Patricia Carral & Carlos-María Alcover, 2019. "Measuring Age Discrimination at Work: Spanish Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Nordic Age Discrimination Scale (NADS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Klaudia Przybysz & Agnieszka Stanimir & Marta Wasiak, 2021. "Subjective Assessment of Seniors on the Phenomenon of Discrimination: Analysis Against the Background of the Europe 2020 Strategy Implementation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 810-835.
    4. Lotte P. Brinkhof & Sanne de Wit & Jaap M. J. Murre & Harm J. Krugers & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2022. "The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Aracely Soto-Simeone & Teemu Kautonen, 2021. "Senior entrepreneurship following unemployment: a social identity theory perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1683-1706, August.
    6. Kerstin Nilsson & Emma Nilsson, 2022. "Can They Stay or Will They Go? A Cross Sectional Study of Managers’ Attitudes towards Their Senior Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Maeve O'Sullivan & Christine Cross & Jonathan Lavelle, 2021. "Good or bad jobs? Characteristics of older female part‐time work," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 423-441, September.
    8. Livia Anastasiu & Ovidiu Gavriş & Dorin Maier, 2020. "Is Human Capital Ready for Change? A Strategic Approach Adapting Porter’s Five Forces to Human Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Grażyna Bartkowiak & Agnieszka Krugiełka & Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek & Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk, 2020. "Attitudes of Polish Entrepreneurs towards 65+ Knowledge Workers in the Context of Their Pro-Social Attitude and Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Liat Ayalon & Clemens Tesch-Römer, 2017. "Taking a closer look at ageism: self- and other-directed ageist attitudes and discrimination," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-4, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:110-:d:765504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.