IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i9p167-d1739286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Institutions of Emerging Economies: Contribution to Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Yelena Popova

    (Transport and Telecommunication Institute, Faculty of Management and Logistics, LV-1019 Riga, Latvia)

  • Olegs Cernisevs

    (SIA StarBridge, LV-1050 Riga, Latvia)

  • Sergejs Popovs

    (Institute of Life Sciences and Technologies, Daugavpils University, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia)

  • Almas Kalimoldayev

    (Higher School of Economics and Business, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050051, Kazakhstan
    JSC “The Fund of Problem Loans”, Almaty 050051, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Conventional risk assessment frameworks usually define risk as a function of vulnerabilities and threats, but they frequently lack a single quantitative model that incorporates the unique features of each element. In order to close this gap, this paper creates a flexible, open, and theoretically sound risk assessment formula that is still reliable even in the absence of complete vulnerability data. This is particularly important for financial institutions operating in emerging markets, where regulators rarely provide centralized vulnerability assessments and where Basel-type frameworks are only partially implemented. The contribution of the paper is a practically verified Bayesian network model that integrates threat likelihoods, vulnerability likelihoods, and their impacts within a probabilistic structure. Using 500 stratified Monte Carlo scenarios calibrated to real fintech and banking institutions operating under EU and national supervision, we demonstrate that excluding vulnerability impact from the model does not significantly reduce the predictive performance. These findings advance the theory of risk assessment, simplify practical implementation, and enhance the scalability of risk modeling for both traditional banks and fintech institutions in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yelena Popova & Olegs Cernisevs & Sergejs Popovs & Almas Kalimoldayev, 2025. "Financial Institutions of Emerging Economies: Contribution to Risk Assessment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:9:p:167-:d:1739286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/9/167/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/9/167/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    2. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    3. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    5. Zohreh Molamohamadi & Mahmoud Asad Samani & Marjan Karimi, 2024. "Reviewing the historical milestones of risk management," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    7. Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Dominique Vasseur & Francois Beaudouin, 2020. "A hierarchical tree-based decision-making approach for assessing the relative trustworthiness of risk assessment models," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(6), pages 748-763, December.
    8. Zeng, Qing & Lu, Xinjie & Xu, Jin & Lin, Yu, 2024. "Macro-Driven Stock Market Volatility Prediction: Insights from a New Hybrid Machine Learning Approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    9. Célestin Elock Son, 2018. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research," Post-Print hal-03029453, HAL.
    10. Heiner Ackermann & Erik Diessel & Michael Helmling & Neil Jami & Johanna Münch, 2024. "Computing Optimal Mitigation Plans for Force-Majeure Scenarios in Dynamic Manufacturing Chains," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    11. Yijun Liu & Xiaokun Jin & Yunrui Zhang, 2024. "Identifying risks in temporal supernetworks: an IO-SuperPageRank algorithm," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Aigner, Philipp & Schlütter, Sebastian, 2023. "Enhancing gradient capital allocation with orthogonal convexity scenarios," ICIR Working Paper Series 47/23, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    13. Mangirdas Morkunas & Gintaras Cernius & Gintare Giriuniene, 2019. "Assessing Business Risks of Natural Gas Trading Companies: Evidence from GET Baltic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    15. Dr Jason Mwanza & Nothando Tshuma, 2023. "Mitigating Business Risk in Manufacturing SMEs: A nexus between informal and formal business risk management: A case of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(1), pages 1107-1138, January.
    16. Li, Weijun & Sun, Qiqi & Zhang, Jiwang & Zhang, Laibin, 2024. "Quantitative risk assessment of industrial hot work using Adaptive Bow Tie and Petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Ekaterine Gulua & Natalia Kharadze, 2022. "Employed Students' Development Challenges in Georgia," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, ejis_v8_i.
    18. Don Pagach & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2020. "The Challenges and Opportunities for ERM Post-COVID-19: Agendas for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, December.
    19. KeumJi Kim & SeongHwan Yoon, 2018. "Assessment of Building Damage Risk by Natural Disasters in South Korea Using Decision Tree Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Rachita Gupta & Ravi Shankar & Kee-Hung Lai & Ajay Kumar, 2025. "Risk profiling of food security impediments using decision maker’s behavioural preference towards operational risk management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(2), pages 937-972, May.
    21. Aven, Terje, 2020. "Three influential risk foundation papers from the 80s and 90s: Are they still state-of-the-art?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:9:p:167-:d:1739286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.