IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejisjr/287.html

Unveiling Cold War Dynamics in Latin America: the Camelot Project

Author

Listed:
  • Lara Semboloni

    (History and Institutions of the Americas, Università Degli Studi Di Siena, Center for comparative area studies ASAFAL, Italy)

Abstract

This article explores the historical context and implications of a controversial U.S. initiative during the Cold War aimed at analyzing and preventing revolutions and uprisings in less developed regions, particularly in Latin America. Emerging in the aftermath of the Cuban Revolution, the Camelot Project was driven by concerns about the spread of leftist movements in the region. It was developed in 1964 and it sought to understand and anticipate social changes through empirical research, with a focus on behavioral science and psychology. However, its implementation raised accusations of interference and espionage, leading to tensions between the U.S. and Chile, culminating in its rejection by the Chilean government and a Congressional investigation. The article analyzes the project's objectives and methodology and discusses the implications of its termination in 1965, its impact on perceptions of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America, and its role in shaping authoritarian responses to perceived communist threats in the region. The Camelot Project served as a poignant chapter in the political and social history of Latin America, illustrating the intricate interplay between global geopolitical interests and the aspirations for self-determination of individual nations in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Lara Semboloni, 2024. "Unveiling Cold War Dynamics in Latin America: the Camelot Project," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 10, January -.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:287
    DOI: 10.26417/re7frr24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejis/article/view/1699
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejis_v10_i1_24/Semboloni.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/re7frr24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foroogh Ghasemi & Mohammad Hossein Mahmoudi Sari & Vahidreza Yousefi & Reza Falsafi & Jolanta Tamošaitienė, 2018. "Project Portfolio Risk Identification and Analysis, Considering Project Risk Interactions and Using Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    3. Ungureanu Anca & Braicu Cezar & Adrian Ungureanu, 2015. "Risk Identification in Project Management," International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Spiru Haret University, vol. 2(1), pages 259-266, December.
    4. R. A. Aliev & O. H. Huseynov & R. Serdaroglu, 2016. "Ranking of Z-Numbers and Its Application in Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1503-1519, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:eur:ejfejr:45 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Andres Mauricio Molina Barreto & Naoyuki Ishimura, 2023. "Remarks on a copula‐based conditional value at risk for the portfolio problem," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 150-170, July.
    3. Serpell Alfredo Federico & Ferrada Ximena & Rubio Larissa, 2019. "Measuring the performance of project risk management: a preliminary model," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1984-1991, January.
    4. Dilshad Ahmad & Muhammad Afzal, 2025. "Climate change flood risks and post-flood agricultural and non-agricultural economic losses in flood-prone Bait households Muzaffargarh district of Punjab, Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 18275-18311, August.
    5. Simon French, 2024. "Whose Judgement? Reflections on Elicitation in Bayesian Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 143-159, September.
    6. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    7. Michele Bonollo & Martino Grasselli & Gianmarco Mori & Havva Nilsu Oz, 2025. "Informative Risk Measures in the Banking Industry: A Proposal based on the Magnitude-Propensity Approach," Papers 2511.21556, arXiv.org.
    8. Mazurina Mohd Ali & Nur Shazwani Ab Hamid & Erlane K Ghani, 2019. "Examining the Relationship Between Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance in Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 239-251, May.
    9. Bożena Babiarz, 2018. "Aspects of Heat Supply Security Management Using Elements of Decision Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Leif Inge K. Sørskår & Eirik B. Abrahamsen, 2017. "On how to manage uncertainty when considering regulatory HSE interventions," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 97-116, November.
    11. Hui Li & Xuefei Liao & Zhen Li & Lei Pan & Meng Yuan & Ke Qin, 2024. "The Operational Laws of Symmetric Triangular Z-Numbers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Davide Settembre-Blundo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 107-132, December.
    13. Gundula Glowka & Richard Hule & Anita Zehrer, 2024. "Risk perception of SMEs: strategic risks, family-related risks, external risks," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jonas Šaparauskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2018. "Sustainability in Construction Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.
    15. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    16. Maria Cheveresan & Cristian Stefan Dumitriu & Maria Stoica, 2024. "Environmental Economics in Flood Mitigation for River Basins and Cities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 50-57, August.
    17. Sachin Modgil & Rohit Kumar Singh & Cyril Foropon, 2022. "Quality management in humanitarian operations and disaster relief management: a review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1045-1098, December.
    18. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Stamatis Kontsas & Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "Operational risk management in managerial accounting: a comprehensive examination of strategies and implementation in medium size organizations," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-27, September.
    19. Avishag Boker & Einat Grimberg & Felix Tener & Joel Lanir, 2025. "Navigating the Last Mile: A Stakeholder Analysis of Delivery Robot Teleoperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-28, June.
    20. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Asu, John Otu & Hafeez, Khalid & Khoshnevis, Pegah, 2024. "DEA-driven risk management framework for oil supply chains," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    22. Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Alberto Pasanisi & Mathieu Couplet, 2017. "A critical discussion and practical recommendations on some issues relevant to the non-probabilistic treatment of uncertainty in engineering risk assessment," Post-Print hal-01652230, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejisjr:287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.