IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i5p92-d1652386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responding to Climate Policy Risk Through the Dynamic Role of Green Innovation: Evidence from Carbon Information Disclosure in Emerging Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Runyu Liu

    (Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
    School of Accounting, Nanjing Audit University Jinshen College, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Mara Ridhuan Che Abdul Rahman

    (Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

  • Ainul Huda Jamil

    (Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

Abstract

This study investigates how firms in emerging markets respond to climate policy risk, with a particular focus on the dynamic role of green innovation in shaping carbon information disclosure. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) framework, we examine the impact of China’s 2018 carbon reporting policy, which represents an institutionally significant but non-mandatory regulatory intervention, on the disclosure behaviors of A-share listed firms from 2013 to 2022. The results show that the policy significantly increased firms’ attention to carbon information disclosure, especially among those with limited green innovation capacity. In contrast, firms with stronger innovation capabilities exhibited more stable disclosure practices, suggesting a buffering effect against regulatory uncertainty. Further analysis reveals that the moderating effect of green innovation changes over time, as innovation-oriented firms gradually adjust their disclosure strategies in response to evolving policy expectations. These findings highlight green innovation as a key internal resource that enables firms to strategically adapt to climate policy risks. This study contributes to the literature on climate risk management and corporate sustainability by providing empirical evidence on how dynamic capabilities shape disclosure outcomes and risk management strategies under changing regulatory conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Runyu Liu & Mara Ridhuan Che Abdul Rahman & Ainul Huda Jamil, 2025. "Responding to Climate Policy Risk Through the Dynamic Role of Green Innovation: Evidence from Carbon Information Disclosure in Emerging Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:92-:d:1652386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/5/92/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/5/92/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-02-2020-4445 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Brendan O'Dwyer & Jeffrey Unerman, 2020. "Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 1113-1141, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne & Cooper, Bethany & Crase, Lin & Pisaniello, John, 2024. "A framework for supporting climate-exposed asset decision-making in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Kentaro Azuma & Akira Higashida, 2024. "Climate change disclosure and evolving institutional investor salience: Roles of the Principles for Responsible Investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3669-3686, May.
    3. Ali Uyar & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Do shareholders reward or punish risky firms due to CSR reporting and assurance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1596-1620, July.
    4. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2024. "How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Mohamed Saeudy & Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "Accounting Perspectives on The Business Value of Big Data During and Beyond The COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 174-199, June.
    6. Tregidga, Helen & Laine, Matias, 2022. "On crisis and emergency: Is it time to rethink long-term environmental accounting?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Paola Vola & Lorenzo Gelmini, 2022. "Climate change skills for the new CFOs. A preliminary analysis on TCFD by Italian listed companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2 Suppl.), pages 189-209.
    8. Udeke Huiskamp & Bauke ten Brinke & Gert Jan Kramer, 2022. "The climate resilience cycle: Using scenario analysis to inform climate‐resilient business strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1763-1775, May.
    9. Jill Atkins & Federica Doni & Andrea Gasperini & Sonia Artuso & Ilaria Torre & Lorena Sorrentino, 2023. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Sustainability Measurement: Which ESG Metrics Will Survive COVID-19?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 629-646, July.
    10. Jeanne, Amar & Demaria, Samira & Rigot, Sandra, 2023. "What are the drivers of corporates' climate transparency? Evidence from the S&P 1200 index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Clune, Conor & O’Dwyer, Brendan, 2020. "Organizing dissonance through institutional work: The embedding of social and environmental accountability in an investment field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    12. Kameleddine B. Benameur & Mohamed M. Mostafa & Ahmed Hassanein & Mohammed Z. Shariff & Wasim Al-Shattarat, 2024. "Sustainability reporting scholarly research: a bibliometric review and a future research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 823-866, June.
    13. Tom Deweerdt, 2022. "Why Is the Australian Health Sector So Far behind in Practising Climate-Related Disclosures?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
    14. Tom Deweerdt & Kristin Caltabiano & Paul Dargusch, 2022. "Original Research: How Will the TNFD Impact the Health Sector’s Nature-Risks Management?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    15. Francesca Manes‐Rossi & Giuseppe Nicolo', 2022. "Exploring sustainable development goals reporting practices: From symbolic to substantive approaches—Evidence from the energy sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1799-1815, September.
    16. Hien Hoang & Robyn Moroney & Soon‐Yeow Phang & Xinning Xiao, 2023. "Investor reactions to key audit matters: Financial and non‐financial contexts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3325-3349, September.
    17. Riccardo Santoni, 2023. "Integrated Reporting come sistema manageriale per raggiungere obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile: una verifica empirica," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 43-68.
    18. Elda Du Toit, 2024. "Thirty Years of Sustainability Reporting: Insights, Gaps and an Agenda for Future Research Through a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-33, December.
    19. Martina K. Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K. Singh, 2020. "Sixty years of Accounting & Finance: a bibliometric analysis of major research themes and contributions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3217-3251, December.
    20. Sophie Giordano-Spring & Carlos Larrinaga & Géraldine Rivière-Giordano, 2024. "Field-configuring events and the failure to standardise accounting for carbon emissions," Post-Print hal-04686904, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:5:p:92-:d:1652386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.