IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i4p71-d1626744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Firms’ Propensity to Use Intercorporate Loans: Empirical Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Biswajit Ghose

    (Department of Commerce, Tezpur University, Napaam 784028, India)

  • Prasenjit Roy

    (Department of Commerce, Tezpur University, Napaam 784028, India)

  • Yeshi Ngima

    (Department of Commerce, Tezpur University, Napaam 784028, India)

  • Kiran Gope

    (Department of Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, India)

  • Pankaj Kumar Tyagi

    (University Institute of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Chandigarh University, Mohali 140413, India)

  • Premendra Kumar Singh

    (Centre for Distance and Online Education, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India)

  • Asokan Vasudevan

    (Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia)

Abstract

Several studies have investigated the determinants of firms’ capital structure choices. Though an intercorporate loan is an essential source of corporate debt, there are no studies that examine the determinants of firms’ preference to use the intercorporate loan as a source of debt. This study examines the relevance of the conventional capital structure determinants in explaining firms’ tendency to use intercorporate loans. The study is based on a dataset of 53,112 firm-year observations comprising 3739 non-financial listed Indian firms for 21 years from 2002 to 2022. The random effect logistic regression model is used to investigate the objectives. The conventional capital structure determinants are relevant in explaining firms’ decisions to use intercorporate loans. Firm size, asset tangibility, and earnings volatility favorably influence the tendency to use intercorporate loans, whereas profitability, growth, uniqueness, dividend payment, ownership concentration, and foreign promoter holdings adversely affect the same. The results reveal that the influence of firm size, uniqueness, earnings volatility, and ownership concentration are not unidirectional for group-affiliated and standalone firms. The findings are mostly consistent with the arguments of conventional capital structure theories. The results of this study will be pragmatic for financial managers in their capital structure decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Biswajit Ghose & Prasenjit Roy & Yeshi Ngima & Kiran Gope & Pankaj Kumar Tyagi & Premendra Kumar Singh & Asokan Vasudevan, 2025. "Determinants of Firms’ Propensity to Use Intercorporate Loans: Empirical Evidence from India," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:71-:d:1626744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/71/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/71/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tarun Khanna & Krishna Palepu, 2000. "Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 867-891, April.
    2. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    3. Chang, Sea Jin & Choi, Unghwan, 1988. "Strategy, Structure and Performance of Korean Business Groups: A Transactions Cost Approach," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 141-158, December.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Hersh Shefrin, 2001. "Behavioral Corporate Finance," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(3), pages 113-126, September.
    6. repec:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:3:p:1301-1327 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Manos, Ronny & Murinde, Victor & Green, Christopher J., 2012. "Dividend policy and business groups: Evidence from Indian firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 42-56.
    8. Agarwal, Anushka & Chaudhry, Neeru, 2022. "Foreign controlling shareholders and corporate investment," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Chang, Ya-Kai & Chou, Robin K. & Huang, Tai-Hsin, 2014. "Corporate governance and the dynamics of capital structure: New evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 374-385.
    10. Ronald C. Anderson & David M. Reeb, 2003. "Founding‐Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(3), pages 1301-1328, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biswajit Ghose, 2017. "Impact of Business Group Affiliation on Capital Structure Adjustment Speed: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Sector," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 54-67, May.
    2. Biswajit Ghose & Kailash Chandra Kabra, 2018. "Dynamic Capital Structure Adjustments and Business Group Affiliations: Indian Evidence," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 6(1), pages 27-41, January.
    3. Prasanna Krishna & Ramanathan Geeta & Arora Bharat, 2017. "Family Ownership, Earnings Informativeness, and Role of Audit Committees: An Empirical Investigation in India," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 9, pages 57-70, August.
    4. Xiaowei Rose Luo & Chi-Nien Chung, 2013. "Filling or Abusing the Institutional Void? Ownership and Management Control of Public Family Businesses in an Emerging Market," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 591-613, April.
    5. Ishtiaq Ahmad & Judit Oláh & József Popp & Domicián Máté, 2018. "Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Connelly, J. Thomas, 2016. "Investment policy at family firms: Evidence from Thailand," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 91-122.
    7. Wenyi Chu, 2009. "The influence of family ownership on SME performance: evidence from public firms in Taiwan," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 353-373, October.
    8. Choi, Young Rok & Zahra, Shaker A. & Yoshikawa, Toru & Han, Bong H., 2015. "Family ownership and R&D investment: The role of growth opportunities and business group membership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 1053-1061.
    9. Nishant B. Labhane, 2019. "Dividend Policy Decisions in India: Standalone Versus Business Group-Affiliated Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(1), pages 133-150, February.
    10. Ginesti, Gianluca & Ossorio, Mario & Dawson, Alexandra, 2023. "Family businesses and debt maturity structure: Focusing on family involvement in governance to explain heterogeneity," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    11. Malcolm Baker & Richard S. Ruback & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2004. "Behavioral Corporate Finance: A Survey," NBER Working Papers 10863, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Lin, Tsui-Jung & Chang, Hai-Yen & Yu, Hui-Fun & Kao, Ching-Pao, 2019. "The impact of political connections and business groups on cash holdings: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 65-73.
    13. Biswajit Ghose & Kailash Chandra Kabra, 2019. "Capital Structure Dynamics and Financing Imbalance: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 5(2), pages 103-124, November.
    14. Danso, Albert & Lartey, Theophilus & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Adomako, Samuel & Lu, Qinye & Uddin, Moshfique, 2019. "Market sentiment and firm investment decision-making," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    15. Khosa,Amrinder & Ahmed,Kamran & Henry,Darren, 2019. "Ownership Structure, Related Party Transactions, and Firm Valuation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108492195, June.
    16. Nishant B. Labhane & Jitendra Mahakud, 2018. "Dividend Smoothing and Business Groups: Evidence from Indian Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3), pages 690-706, June.
    17. Ridha Esghaier, 2017. "Capital Structure Choices and Behavioral Biases: An Application to a Panel of US Industrial Companies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 608-622.
    18. G. T. Lumpkin & Keith H. Brigham, 2011. "Long–Term Orientation and Intertemporal Choice in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(6), pages 1149-1169, November.
    19. Al-Hadi, Ahmed & Taylor, Grantley & Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed, 2016. "Ruling Family Political Connections and Risk Reporting: Evidence from the GCC," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 504-524.
    20. Chan-Jane Lin & Tawei Wang & Chao-Jung Pan, 2016. "Financial reporting quality and investment decisions for family firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 499-532, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:71-:d:1626744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.