IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v13y2025i4p64-d1622005.html

Do Board Characteristics Matter with Greenwashing? An Investigation in the Financial Sector with the Integration of Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni Poiriazi

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51 100 Grevena, Greece)

  • Georgia Zournatzidou

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51 100 Grevena, Greece)

  • George Konteos

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, 51 100 Grevena, Greece)

Abstract

Financial industry executives are sincerely concerned about the potential effects of greenwashing on their organizations. The primary objective of this research is to investigate the impact of board features on greenwashing and the strategies that executives may develop to mitigate the effects of corporate washing phenomena. A novel set of criteria was evaluated for 359 listed European financial institutions. Data were acquired from the Refinitiv Eikon database for the Fiscal Year 2024. The entropy weight and TOPSIS multicriteria decision-making methodologies were used to assess the data. These assist us in determining the relative importance of each chosen criteria about the board’s attributes and their impact on greenwashing. The study indicates that governance is the primary factor affecting greenwashing. Furthermore, findings indicate that the board of directors significantly influences the increased prevalence of greenwashing among financial firms. This suggests that the relationship between board size and greenwashing is debatable. The problem of greenwashing has primarily elevated the standards for evaluating board effectiveness and conflicts of interest, which are listed third on the list. The study results may inform the establishment of a new research agenda in the examined area.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni Poiriazi & Georgia Zournatzidou & George Konteos, 2025. "Do Board Characteristics Matter with Greenwashing? An Investigation in the Financial Sector with the Integration of Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-41, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:64-:d:1622005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/64/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/13/4/64/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Dongyang, 2022. "Green financial system regulation shock and greenwashing behaviors: Evidence from Chinese firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Li & Senwei Huang & Junjie Lin & Jing Cui, 2024. "The Impact of Analysts’ Attention on the Quantity and Quality of Enterprise Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    2. Gu, Leilei & Liu, Zhongyang & Xu, Danyang, 2023. "The risk-mitigating role of corporate social responsibility in Chinese listed heavy-polluting companies: An extreme event experience perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Zhang, Dongyang & Fang, Tingwei & He, Yurun, 2025. "Green public procurement as a policy signal: Attracting green investors despite local protectionism," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Wang, Xiaoteng & Zhou, Bole & Li, Xiaoling, 2025. "Qualified foreign institutional investors and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Galletta, Simona & Goodell, John W. & Mazzù, Sebastiano & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2025. "The impact of environmental disclosure and controversies on bank value," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 134.
    7. Tian Luan, 2024. "A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling and Its Impact: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Furkan Demirtaş & Emine Kaya & Festus Victor Bekun & Mücahit Çitil & Mustafa Torusdağ & Abdulkadir Barut, 2025. "Do institutional quality and military expenditure of G20 countries affect green investments?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(6), pages 2639-2664, September.
    9. Yongbo Sun & Binbin Shi, 2022. "Impact of Greenwashing Perception on Consumers’ Green Purchasing Intentions: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Bhullar, Pritpal Singh & Joshi, Mahesh & Sharma, Sharad & Kaur, Amanpreet & Phan, Duc, 2025. "Greenwashing and ESG: Bibliometric analysis and future research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Lin, Jiayu & Pan, Dongliang & Sha, Yezhou, 2025. "The impact of ESG investment on fund performance: Evidence from mutual fund style drift," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Gao, Lifang & Yin, Heng, 2025. "Managerial myopia and greenwashing: A machine learning and text analysis approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. Fangjun Wang & Xinmiao Zhou & Tian Gan, 2024. "Can green funds improve corporate environmental, social, and governance performance? Evidence from Chinese-listed companies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-32, March.
    14. Han, Weiping & Zhang, Bo, 2025. "Environmental protection law, green investment, and corporate greenwashing behavior," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PG).
    15. Zhang, Yabin & Jianhua, Dai, 2025. "Financial regulation and liquidity risk of small and medium-sized banks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    16. Ge, Xiaowen & Xue, Minggao & Cao, Ruiyi, 2024. "Do Chinese carbon-intensive stocks overreact to climate transition risk? Evidence from the COP26 news," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Chen, Yanpeng & Masron, Tajul Ariffin, 2025. "The role of media visibility in mitigating greenwashing driven by executive environmental cognition: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Wen, Jun & Zhang, Sen & Chang, Chun-Ping & Anugrah, Donni Fajar & Affandi, Yoga, 2023. "Does climate vulnerability promote green investment under energy supply restriction?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Liu, Jing-Yue & Lei, Quan & Li, Ruojin & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2024. "Resistance or motivation? Impact of climate risk on corporate greenwashing: An empirical study of Chinese enterprises," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    20. Lingling Xu & Tingting Tian, 2024. "Blockchain-enabled enterprise bleaching green regulation banking evolution game analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27457-27483, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:64-:d:1622005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.