IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2024i10p157-d1491608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advantages of Accounting for Stochasticity in the Premium Process

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Miao

    (Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

  • Kristina P. Sendova

    (Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

Abstract

In this paper, we study a risk model with stochastic premium income and its impact on solvency risk management. It is assumed that both the premium arrival process and the claim arrival process are modelled by homogeneous Poisson processes, and that the premium amounts are modelled by independent and identically distributed random variables. While this model has been studied in the existing literature and certain explicit results are known under more restrictive assumptions, these results are relatively difficult to apply in practice. In this paper, we investigate the factors that differentiate this model and the classical risk model. After reviewing various known results of this model, we derive a simulation approach for obtaining the probability of ultimate ruin based on importance sampling, which does not require specific distributions for the premium and the claim. We demonstrate this approach first with examples where the distribution of the sampling random variable can be identified. We then provide additional examples where we use the fast Fourier transform to obtain an approximation of the sampling random variable. The simulated results are compared with the known results for the probability of ruin. Using the simulation approach, we apply this model to a real-life auto-insurance data set. Differences with the classical model are then discussed. Finally, we comment on the suitability and impact of using this model in the context of solvency risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Miao & Kristina P. Sendova, 2024. "Advantages of Accounting for Stochasticity in the Premium Process," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:157-:d:1491608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/10/157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/10/157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bühlmann, Hans & Delbaen, Freddy & Embrechts, Paul & Shiryaev, Albert N., 1998. "On Esscher Transforms in Discrete Finance Models," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 171-186, November.
    2. Avanzi, Benjamin & Taylor, Greg & Wong, Bernard & Yang, Xinda, 2021. "On the modelling of multivariate counts with Cox processes and dependent shot noise intensities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 9-24.
    3. Grübel, Rudolf & Hermesmeier, Renate, 1999. "Computation of Compound Distributions I: Aliasing Errors and Exponential Tilting," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 197-214, November.
    4. Hansjörg Albrecher & José Carlos Araujo-Acuna & Jan Beirlant, 2021. "Fitting Nonstationary Cox Processes: An Application to Fire Insurance Data," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 135-162, April.
    5. Søren Asmussen & Tomasz Rolski, 1994. "Risk Theory in a Periodic Environment: The Cramér-Lundberg Approximation and Lundberg's Inequality," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 410-433, May.
    6. Asmussen, S. & Binswanger, K., 1997. "Simulation of Ruin Probabilities for Subexponential Claims," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 297-318, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albrecher Hansjörg & Kantor Josef, 2002. "Simulation of ruin probabilities for risk processes of Markovian type," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 111-128, December.
    2. Tak Siu & John Lau & Hailiang Yang, 2007. "On Valuing Participating Life Insurance Contracts with Conditional Heteroscedasticity," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 14(3), pages 255-275, September.
    3. Siu, Tak Kuen & Yang, Hailiang & Lau, John W., 2008. "Pricing currency options under two-factor Markov-modulated stochastic volatility models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 295-302, December.
    4. Monfort, Alain & Pegoraro, Fulvio, 2012. "Asset pricing with Second-Order Esscher Transforms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1678-1687.
    5. Robert Elliott & Tak Siu, 2015. "Asset Pricing Using Trading Volumes in a Hidden Regime-Switching Environment," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 22(2), pages 133-149, May.
    6. Dassios, Angelos & Jang, Jiwook & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2015. "A risk model with renewal shot-noise Cox process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 55-65.
    7. Siu, Tak Kuen, 2023. "European option pricing with market frictions, regime switches and model uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 233-250.
    8. Tak Siu, 2006. "Option Pricing Under Autoregressive Random Variance Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 62-75.
    9. Duffie, Darrell, 2003. "Intertemporal asset pricing theory," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 11, pages 639-742, Elsevier.
    10. Luis Rincón & David J. Santana, 2022. "Ruin Probability for Finite Erlang Mixture Claims Via Recurrence Sequences," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2213-2236, September.
    11. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2009. "A modified Panjer algorithm for operational risk capital calculations," Post-Print halshs-00443846, HAL.
    12. Hubalek, Friedrich & Sgarra, Carlo, 2009. "On the Esscher transforms and other equivalent martingale measures for Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard stochastic volatility models with jumps," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(7), pages 2137-2157, July.
    13. Yuguang Fan & Philip S. Griffin & Ross Maller & Alexander Szimayer & Tiandong Wang, 2017. "The Effects of Largest Claim and Excess of Loss Reinsurance on a Company’s Ruin Time and Valuation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel V. Shevchenko, 2009. "Computing Tails of Compound Distributions Using Direct Numerical Integration," Papers 0904.0830, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2010.
    15. León, à ngel & Mencía, Javier & Sentana, Enrique, 2009. "Parametric Properties of Semi-Nonparametric Distributions, with Applications to Option Valuation," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 176-192.
    16. Javier Mencía & Enrique Sentana, 2018. "Volatility-Related Exchange Traded Assets: An Econometric Investigation," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 599-614, October.
    17. Paul Embrechts & Marco Frei, 2009. "Panjer recursion versus FFT for compound distributions," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(3), pages 497-508, July.
    18. Ghossoub, Mario, 2019. "Budget-constrained optimal insurance with belief heterogeneity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 79-91.
    19. Tahir Choulli & Ella Elazkany & Mich`ele Vanmaele, 2024. "The second-order Esscher martingale densities for continuous-time market models," Papers 2407.03960, arXiv.org.
    20. López Cabrera, Brenda & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2013. "Pricing rainfall derivatives at the CME," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2013-005, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2024:i:10:p:157-:d:1491608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.