IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v11y2023i3p51-d1078570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cryptocurrency Risks, Fraud Cases, and Financial Performance

Author

Listed:
  • David S. Kerr

    (Turner School of Accountancy, Belk College of Business, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28262, USA)

  • Karen A. Loveland

    (Department of Management & Marketing, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

  • Katherine Taken Smith

    (College of Business, RELLIS Campus, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Bryan, TX 77807, USA)

  • Lawrence Murphy Smith

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business, RELLIS Campus, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Bryan, TX 77807, USA)

Abstract

In this study, we examine major cryptocurrencies, present notable fraud cases, describe fraud risks, and analyze cryptocurrency financial performance. People debate whether cryptocurrency is an investment opportunity, the new Dutch Tulip Bubble, or a giant Ponzi scheme. There have been a number of high-profile fraud cases associated with cryptocurrencies, such as the FTX scandal in late 2022, thereby making fraud a real concern to current and potential future investors. Regarding financial performance, cryptocurrencies experienced a major collapse in value in the most recent period of the study, about three times worse than the major stock market indices. While in prior periods, cryptocurrencies have significantly outperformed stock market indices, recent fraud cases and the extreme volatility of cryptocurrencies indicate that investing in cryptocurrencies comes with much higher risk than traditional stock market investments. The debate over the investment potential of cryptocurrencies continues, whether they have long term value or are simply the new Dutch Tulip Bubble. The study’s findings will be useful to investors, regulators, and academic researchers regarding the cryptocurrency industry.

Suggested Citation

  • David S. Kerr & Karen A. Loveland & Katherine Taken Smith & Lawrence Murphy Smith, 2023. "Cryptocurrency Risks, Fraud Cases, and Financial Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:51-:d:1078570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/3/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/11/3/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce Runyan & Katherine T. Smith & L. Murphy Smith, 2008. "Implications of Web assurance services on e-commerce," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 46-61, March.
    2. Ernest N. Biktimirov & Yuanbin Xu, 2019. "Market reactions to changes in the Dow Jones industrial average index," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 792-812, May.
    3. Ernest N. Biktimirov & Yuanbin Xu, 2019. "Market reactions to changes in the Dow Jones industrial average index," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 792-812, May.
    4. Runyan, Bruce & Smith, Katherine T. & Smith, L. Murphy, 2008. "Implications of Web assurance services on e-commerce," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 46-61.
    5. Michael Kend & Lan Anh Nguyen, 2020. "Big Data Analytics and Other Emerging Technologies: The Impact on the Australian Audit and Assurance Profession," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 269-282, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arpaci, Ibrahim, 2023. "Predictors of financial sustainability for cryptocurrencies: An empirical study using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sang Soo Kim, 2020. "Purchase Intention in the Online Open Market: Do Concerns for E-Commerce Really Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Orthodoxia Kyriacou & Jatin Pancholi & Angathevar Baskaran, 2010. "(Re)presentation of women in Indian accountancy bodies' web sites," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 329-352, August.
    3. Alessio Faccia & Vishal Pandey & Charu Banga, 2022. "Is Permissioned Blockchain the Key to Support the External Audit Shift to Entirely Open Innovation Paradigm?," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Biktimirov, Ernest N. & Afego, Pyemo N., 2022. "Do investors value environmental sustainability? Evidence from the FTSE Environmental Opportunities 100 index," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    5. Ruhnke, Klaus, 2023. "Empirical research frameworks in a changing world: The case of audit data analytics," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    6. Deli Wang & Ke Peng & Kaiye Tang & Yewei Wu, 2022. "Does Fintech Development Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Michael Bradbury & Bryan Howieson, 2020. "Editorial: Promoting the Usefulness of Research to Standard Setters," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 229-230, December.
    8. Laila Dahabiyeh & Omar Mowafi, 2023. "Challenges of using RPA in auditing: A socio‐technical systems approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 76-86, April.
    9. de Villiers, Charl & Kuruppu, Sanjaya & Dissanayake, Dinithi, 2021. "A (new) role for business – Promoting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals through the internet-of-things and blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 598-609.
    10. Marco Bellucci & Damiano Cesa Bianchi & Giacomo Manetti, 2021. "A literature review on blockchain in accounting research," Working Papers - Business wp2021_04.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    11. Boulianne, Emilio & Cho, Charles H., 2009. "The rise and fall of WebTrust," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 229-244.
    12. Kanyarat (Lek) Sanoran & Jomsurang Ruangprapun, 2023. "Initial Implementation of Data Analytics and Audit Process Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Nanja Kroon & Maria do Céu Alves & Isabel Martins, 2021. "The Impacts of Emerging Technologies on Accountants’ Role and Skills: Connecting to Open Innovation—A Systematic Literature Review," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Emilio Boulianne & Charles H. Cho, 2009. "The Rise And Fall Of Webtrust," Post-Print halshs-00459412, HAL.
    15. Biktimirov, Ernest N. & Afego, Pyemo N., 2022. "Does investors’ valuation of corporate environmental activities vary between developed and emerging market firms?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    16. Ravi Seethamraju & Angela Hecimovic, 2023. "Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 780-800, November.
    17. Pizzi, Simone & Venturelli, Andrea & Variale, Michele & Macario, Giuseppe Pio, 2021. "Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:51-:d:1078570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.