IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i6p62-d1153991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Two Different Oyster ( Crassostrea gigas ) Farming Strategies in the Sacca di Goro, Northern Adriatic Sea, Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Summa

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
    Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 17/19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Edoardo Turolla

    (Istituto Delta Ecologia Applicata, 44124 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Mattia Lanzoni

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Elena Tamisari

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Castaldelli

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Elena Tamburini

    (Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

Abstract

The Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas is one of the world’s most cultivated and prized molluscs. Although it is usually considered a luxury product, it meets all the requirements to be included in a sustainable diet, and its production and consumption have great potential for growth in the coming years. Oyster farming is a worldwide activity, with China and France as the main producers, but recently, the possibility of implementing the Italian production, mainly focused on clams and mussels, has been considered an interesting issue, especially due to the growing local and global demand. The present study has been carried out by collecting data from the Sacca di Goro, north-east Italy, the most important national mollusc farming area. Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to two different farming scenarios in order to improve the overall sustainability of the process. Using OpenLCA™ software (GreenDelta, Berlin, Germany) and the ReCiPe ® midpoint (H) v.1.12 method, the environmental impacts of the traditional Italian farming technique, carried out entirely offshore in longlines, and the alternative option, in which the oyster seed pre-fattening phase was carried out in the lagoon, were calculated and compared. The results show that replacing the current pre-fattening phase with pre-fattening in a lagoon reduces CO 2 emissions by approximately 12% and all other impact categories by approximately 9%. In addition, non-recyclable plastic materials and fuel consumption emerged as the main environmental hotspots.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Summa & Edoardo Turolla & Mattia Lanzoni & Elena Tamisari & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elena Tamburini, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Two Different Oyster ( Crassostrea gigas ) Farming Strategies in the Sacca di Goro, Northern Adriatic Sea, Italy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:62-:d:1153991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/6/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/6/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Tamburini & Elisa Anna Fano & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Edoardo Turolla, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Oyster Farming in the Po Delta, Northern Italy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Edoardo Turolla & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano & Elena Tamburini, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Proves that Manila Clam Farming ( Ruditapes Philippinarum ) is a Fully Sustainable Aquaculture Practice and a Carbon Sink," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Elena Tamburini & Edoardo Turolla & Elisa Anna Fano & Giuseppe Castaldelli, 2020. "Sustainability of Mussel ( Mytilus Galloprovincialis ) Farming in the Po River Delta, Northern Italy, Based on a Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Marzano, Annalisa, 2013. "Harvesting the Sea: The Exploitation of Marine Resources in the Roman Mediterranean," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199675623.
    5. Daniela Summa & Mattia Lanzoni & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano & Elena Tamburini, 2022. "Trends and Opportunities of Bivalve Shells’ Waste Valorization in a Prospect of Circular Blue Bioeconomy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dheanara Pinka & Kazuyo Matsubae, 2023. "Global Warming Potential and Waste Handling of Pearl Farming in Ago Bay, Mie Prefecture, Japan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Jesse Sherry & Jennifer Koester, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Aquaculture Stewardship Council Certified Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Antonio Cortés & Sara González‐García & Amaya Franco‐Uría & Maria Teresa Moreira & Gumersindo Feijoo, 2022. "Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of the inshore great scallop (Pecten maximus) fishery in Galicia," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1920-1933, December.
    4. Arianna Martini & Leonardo Aguiari & Fabrizio Capoccioni & Marco Martinoli & Riccardo Napolitano & Giacomo Pirlo & Nicolò Tonachella & Domitilla Pulcini, 2023. "Is Manila Clam Farming Environmentally Sustainable? A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach Applied to an Italian Ruditapes philippinarum Hatchery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-9, February.
    5. Cheila Almeida & Philippe Loubet & Tamíris Pacheco da Costa & Paula Quinteiro & Jara Laso & David Baptista de Sousa & Ronan Cooney & Sinead Mellett & Guido Sonnemann & Carlos José Rodríguez & Neil Row, 2022. "Packaging environmental impact on seafood supply chains: A review of life cycle assessment studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1961-1978, December.
    6. Sang Hyeop Park & Jinsung An & Agamemnon Koutsospyros & Deok Hyun Moon, 2023. "Assessment of the Stabilization of Cu-, Pb-, and Zn-Contaminated Fine Soil Using Cockle Shells, Scallop Shells, and Starfish," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Bi, Zhimin & Liu, Shutang & Ouyang, Miao, 2022. "Three-dimensional pattern dynamics of a fractional predator-prey model with cross-diffusion and herd behavior," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 421(C).
    8. Gaglio, M. & Lanzoni, M. & Goggi, F. & Fano, E.A. & Castaldelli, G., 2023. "Integrating payment for ecosystem services in protected areas governance: The case of the Po Delta Park," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Manna, Debasis & Maiti, Alakes & Samanta, G.P., 2018. "Analysis of a predator-prey model for exploited fish populations with schooling behavior," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 317(C), pages 35-48.
    10. Edoardo Turolla & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano & Elena Tamburini, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Proves that Manila Clam Farming ( Ruditapes Philippinarum ) is a Fully Sustainable Aquaculture Practice and a Carbon Sink," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-12, June.
    11. Elena Tamburini & Elisa Anna Fano & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Edoardo Turolla, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Oyster Farming in the Po Delta, Northern Italy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Evangelos Kallitsis & Anna Korre & Dimitris Mousamas & Pavlos Avramidis, 2020. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Mediterranean Sea Bass and Sea Bream," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-11, November.
    13. Haochen Hou & Haiheng Wang & Anqi Ren & Yun Zhang & Ying Liu, 2022. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of the Manufacturing of Conventional and Innovative Aerators: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-11, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:62-:d:1153991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.