IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v9y2021i23p3099-d692441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Estimation of the Initial Stock in the Problem of Resource Extraction

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Tur

    (Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Control Processes, St Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Gromova

    (Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Control Processes, St Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Dmitry Gromov

    (Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Control Processes, St Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

We consider a differential game of non-renewable resource extraction, in which the players do not know the precise value of the resource stock and, thus, have to make an estimate. We define the value of information about the initial stock and give recommendations for the choice of the estimate depending on the parameters of the problem. Further, we consider the situation where the players only know the bounds for the stock of the resource and solve the problem of computing the optimal estimate, such that it minimizes the players’ losses in the worst-case scenario. The analysis allows us to give a simple rule for the choice of the optimal estimate of the resource stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Tur & Ekaterina Gromova & Dmitry Gromov, 2021. "On the Estimation of the Initial Stock in the Problem of Resource Extraction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:23:p:3099-:d:692441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/23/3099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/23/3099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hart, Rob, 2016. "Non-renewable resources in the long run," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-20.
    2. Fumie Yokota & Kimberly M. Thompson, 2004. "Value of Information Analysis in Environmental Health Risk Management Decisions: Past, Present, and Future," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 635-650, June.
    3. Jeffrey M. Keisler & Zachary A. Collier & Eric Chu & Nina Sinatra & Igor Linkov, 2014. "Value of information analysis: the state of application," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 3-23, March.
    4. Dockner,Engelbert J. & Jorgensen,Steffen & Long,Ngo Van & Sorger,Gerhard, 2000. "Differential Games in Economics and Management Science," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521637329.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shimai Su & Anna Tur, 2022. "Estimation of Initial Stock in Pollution Control Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-11, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaakkola, Niko, 2019. "Carbon taxation, OPEC and the end of oil," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 101-117.
    2. Zou, Guang & Faber, Michael Havbro & González, Arturo & Banisoleiman, Kian, 2021. "Computing the value of information from periodic testing in holistic decision making under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Francesco Cavazza & Francesco Galioto & Meri Raggi & Davide Viaggi, 2020. "Digital Irrigated Agriculture: Towards a Framework for Comprehensive Analysis of Decision Processes under Uncertainty," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Dohyeong Kim & Zachary Brown & Richard Anderson & Clifford Mutero & Marie Lynn Miranda & Jonathan Wiener & Randall Kramer, 2017. "The Value of Information in Decision‐Analytic Modeling for Malaria Vector Control in East Africa," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 231-244, February.
    5. Shimai Su & Anna Tur, 2022. "Estimation of Initial Stock in Pollution Control Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-11, September.
    6. Strand,Jon & Siddiqui,Sauleh, 2015. "Value of improved information about forest protection values, with application to rainforest valuation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7423, The World Bank.
    7. Xiaoyi Liu & Jonghyun Lee & Peter Kitanidis & Jack Parker & Ungtae Kim, 2012. "Value of Information as a Context-Specific Measure of Uncertainty in Groundwater Remediation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(6), pages 1513-1535, April.
    8. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2019. "General analysis of dynamic oligopoly with sticky price," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2990-2998.
    9. Amanda P. Rehr & Mitchell J. Small & Paul S. Fischbeck & Patricia Bradley & William S. Fisher, 2014. "The role of scientific studies in building consensus in environmental decision making: a coral reef example," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 60-87, March.
    10. Luca Lambertini & Arsen Palestini & Alessandro Tampieri, 2016. "CSR in an Asymmetric Duopoly with Environmental Externality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 236-252, July.
    11. Açıkgöz, Ömer T. & Benchekroun, Hassan, 2017. "Anticipated international environmental agreements," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 306-336.
    12. Xiaochi Wu, 2022. "Existence of value for a differential game with asymmetric information and signal revealing," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 51(1), pages 213-247, March.
    13. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Working Papers hal-01592958, HAL.
    14. Reinhard Neck & Dmitri Blueschke, 2014. "“Haircuts” for the EMU periphery: virtue or vice?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 153-175, May.
    15. Benchekroun, Hassan & Ray Chaudhuri, Amrita & Tasneem, Dina, 2020. "On the impact of trade in a common property renewable resource oligopoly," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. A. J. Novak & G. Feichtinger & G. Leitmann, 2010. "A Differential Game Related to Terrorism: Nash and Stackelberg Strategies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 533-555, March.
    17. Gerhard Sorger, 2005. "A dynamic common property resource problem with amenity value and extraction costs," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 1(1), pages 3-19, March.
    18. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida, 2021. "Dynamic decision making in a mixed market under cooperation: Towards sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    19. Smala Fanokoa, Pascaux & Telahigue, Issam & Zaccour, Georges, 2011. "Buying cooperation in an asymmetric environmental differential game," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 935-946, June.
    20. Hilli, Amal & Laussel, Didier & Van Long, Ngo, 2013. "Large shareholders, monitoring, and ownership dynamics: Toward pure managerial firms?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 666-679.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:9:y:2021:i:23:p:3099-:d:692441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.