IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i9p1457-d406353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer for a Supplier Selection and Order Quantity Allocation Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Avelina Alejo-Reyes

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Mexico)

  • Erik Cuevas

    (Departamento de Electrónica, Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI. Av. Revolución 1500, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico)

  • Alma Rodríguez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Mexico
    Departamento de Electrónica, Universidad de Guadalajara, CUCEI. Av. Revolución 1500, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico)

  • Abraham Mendoza

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Mexico)

  • Elias Olivares-Benitez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Álvaro del Portillo 49, Zapopan 45010, Mexico)

Abstract

Supplier selection and order quantity allocation have a strong influence on a company’s profitability and the total cost of finished products. From an optimization perspective, the processes of selecting the right suppliers and allocating orders are modeled through a cost function that considers different elements, such as the price of raw materials, ordering costs, and holding costs. Obtaining the optimal solution for these models represents a complex problem due to their discontinuity, non-linearity, and high multi-modality. Under such conditions, it is not possible to use classical optimization methods. On the other hand, metaheuristic schemes have been extensively employed as alternative optimization techniques to solve difficult problems. Among the metaheuristic computation algorithms, the Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) algorithm corresponds to a relatively new technique based on the hunting behavior of wolves. Even though GWO allows obtaining satisfying results, its limited exploration reduces its performance significantly when it faces high multi-modal and discontinuous cost functions. In this paper, a modified version of the GWO scheme is introduced to solve the complex optimization problems of supplier selection and order quantity allocation. The improved GWO method called iGWO includes weighted factors and a displacement vector to promote the exploration of the search strategy, avoiding the use of unfeasible solutions. In order to evaluate its performance, the proposed algorithm has been tested on a number of instances of a difficult problem found in the literature. The results show that the proposed algorithm not only obtains the optimal cost solutions, but also maintains a better search strategy, finding feasible solutions in all instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Avelina Alejo-Reyes & Erik Cuevas & Alma Rodríguez & Abraham Mendoza & Elias Olivares-Benitez, 2020. "An Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer for a Supplier Selection and Order Quantity Allocation Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:9:p:1457-:d:406353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/9/1457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/9/1457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He-Yau Kang & Amy H.I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Cheng-Han Lee, 2017. "An efficient method for dynamic-demand joint replenishment problem with multiple suppliers and multiple vehicles," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 1065-1084, February.
    2. Dobos, Imre & Vörösmarty, Gyöngyi, 2019. "Inventory-related costs in green supplier selection problems with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 374-380.
    3. Anand Nair & Jayanth Jayaram & Ajay Das, 2015. "Strategic purchasing participation, supplier selection, supplier evaluation and purchasing performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 6263-6278, October.
    4. Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Ries, J. M., 2014. "The Lot Sizing Problem: A Tertiary Study," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63361, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Ching-Ter Chang & Huang-Mu Chen & Zheng-Yun Zhuang, 2014. "Integrated multi-choice goal programming and multi-segment goal programming for supplier selection considering imperfect-quality and price-quantity discounts in a multiple sourcing environment," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 1101-1111, May.
    6. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Ries, Jörg M., 2014. "The lot sizing problem: A tertiary study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 39-51.
    7. Haksever, Cengiz & Moussourakis, John, 2008. "Determining order quantities in multi-product inventory systems subject to multiple constraints and incremental discounts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 930-945, February.
    8. Seyed Mohsen Mousavi & Ardeshir Bahreininejad & S. Nurmaya Musa & Farazila Yusof, 2017. "A modified particle swarm optimization for solving the integrated location and inventory control problems in a two-echelon supply chain network," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 191-206, January.
    9. Mafakheri, Fereshteh & Breton, Michele & Ghoniem, Ahmed, 2011. "Supplier selection-order allocation: A two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 52-57, July.
    10. Brahimi, Nadjib & Dauzere-Peres, Stephane & Najid, Najib M. & Nordli, Atle, 2006. "Single item lot sizing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melega, Gislaine Mara & de Araujo, Silvio Alexandre & Jans, Raf, 2018. "Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 1-19.
    2. Battini, Daria & Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2017. "Reprint of “Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 32-42.
    3. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Quetschlich, Mathias & Moetz, André & Otto, Boris, 2021. "Optimisation model for multi-item multi-echelon supply chains with nested multi-level products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 144-158.
    5. Oliveira, Washington A. & Fiorotto, Diego J. & Song, Xiang & Jones, Dylan F., 2021. "An extended goal programming model for the multiobjective integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 996-1007.
    6. Mac Cawley, Alejandro & Maturana, Sergio & Pascual, Rodrigo & Tortorella, Guilherme Luz, 2022. "Scheduling wine bottling operations with multiple lines and sequence-dependent set-up times: Robust formulation and a decomposition solution approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 819-839.
    7. S. Priyan & R. Uthayakumar, 2017. "Setup cost reduction EMQ inventory system with probabilistic defective and rework in multiple shipments management," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 223-241, June.
    8. Davide Castellano & Christoph H. Glock, 2021. "The average-cost formulation of lot sizing models and inventory carrying charges: a technical note," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 194-201, June.
    9. Hovelaque, Vincent & Bironneau, Laurent, 2015. "The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 285-291.
    10. Lucio Enrico Zavanella & Beatrice Marchi & Simone Zanoni & Ivan Ferretti, 2019. "Energy considerations for the economic production quantity and the joint economic lot sizing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 845-865, September.
    11. Bensmain, Yassir & Dahane, Mohammed & Bennekrouf, Mohammed & Sari, Zaki, 2019. "Preventive remanufacturing planning of production equipment under operational and imperfect maintenance constraints: A hybrid genetic algorithm based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 546-566.
    12. Jafari, L. & Makis, V., 2015. "Joint optimal lot sizing and preventive maintenance policy for a production facility subject to condition monitoring," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 156-168.
    13. Kim, Taebok & Glock, Christoph H., 2018. "Production planning for a two-stage production system with multiple parallel machines and variable production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 284-292.
    14. Sahling, Florian & Hahn, Gerd J., 2019. "Dynamic lot sizing in biopharmaceutical manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 96-106.
    15. Prasert Aengchuan & Busaba Phruksaphanrat, 2018. "Comparison of fuzzy inference system (FIS), FIS with artificial neural networks (FIS + ANN) and FIS with adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (FIS + ANFIS) for inventory control," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 905-923, April.
    16. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H., 2021. "The impact of controllable production rates on the performance of inventory systems: A systematic review of the literature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 703-720.
    17. Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid & Ehsan Shekarian & Eleonora Bottani & Roberto Montanari, 2016. "A fuzzy lot-sizing problem with two-stage composite human learning," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(16), pages 5010-5025, August.
    18. K. F. Mary Latha & M. Ganesh Kumar & R. Uthayakumar, 2021. "Two echelon economic lot sizing problems with geometric shipment policy backorder price discount and optimal investment to reduce ordering cost," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(4), pages 1133-1163, December.
    19. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Ries, Jörg M., 2017. "Reprint of “Decision support models for supplier development: Systematic literature review and research agenda”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 246-260.
    20. Flavio Molina & Reinaldo Morabito & Silvio Alexandre de Araujo, 2016. "MIP models for production lot sizing problems with distribution costs and cargo arrangement," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(11), pages 1395-1407, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:9:p:1457-:d:406353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.