IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v7y2019i12p1150-d290394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Novel Interactive Hybrid Weighted Aggregation Operators with Pythagorean Fuzzy Numbers and Their Applications to Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Na Li

    (Department of Basic Teaching, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China)

  • Harish Garg

    (School of Mathematics, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Deemed University, Patiala 147004, Punjab, India)

  • Lei Wang

    (Department of Basic Teaching, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao 125105, China)

Abstract

A Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS) is one of the extensions of the intuitionistic fuzzy set which accommodate more uncertainties to depict the fuzzy information and hence its applications are more extensive. In the modern decision-making process, aggregation operators are regarded as a useful tool for assessing the given alternatives and whose target is to integrate all the given individual evaluation values into a collective one. Motivated by these primary characteristics, the aim of the present work is to explore a group of interactive hybrid weighted aggregation operators for assembling Pythagorean fuzzy sets to deal with the decision information. The proposed aggregation operators include interactive the hybrid weighted average, interactive hybrid weighted geometric and its generalized versions. The major advantages of the proposed operators to address the decision-making problems are (i) to consider the interaction among membership and non-membership grades of the Pythagorean fuzzy numbers, (ii) it has the property of idempotency and simple computation process, and (iii) it possess an adjust parameter value and can reflect the preference of decision-makers during the decision process. Furthermore, we introduce an innovative multiple attribute decision making (MADM) process under the PFS environment based on suggested operators and illustrate with numerous numerical cases to verify it. The comparative analysis as well as advantages of the proposed framework confirms the supremacies of the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Li & Harish Garg & Lei Wang, 2019. "Some Novel Interactive Hybrid Weighted Aggregation Operators with Pythagorean Fuzzy Numbers and Their Applications to Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:12:p:1150-:d:290394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/12/1150/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/7/12/1150/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Yang & Jiarong Shi & Yong Liu & Yongfeng Pang & Ruiyue Lin, 2018. "Pythagorean Fuzzy Interaction Partitioned Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application in Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-25, November.
    2. Zeshui Xu & Hui Hu, 2010. "Projection Models For Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 267-280.
    3. Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Abbas Mardani & Huchang Liao & Hossein Ahmadi & Azizah Abdul Manaf & Wafa Almukadi, 2019. "A Hybrid Method with TOPSIS and Machine Learning Techniques for Sustainable Development of Green Hotels Considering Online Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sindhwani, Rahul & Singh, Punj Lata & Behl, Abhishek & Afridi, Mohd. Shayan & Sammanit, Debaroti & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2022. "Modeling the critical success factors of implementing net zero emission (NZE) and promoting resilience and social value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Sood, Kirti & Singh, Simarjeet & Behl, Abhishek & Sindhwani, Rahul & Kaur, Sandeepa & Pereira, Vijay, 2023. "Identification and prioritization of the risks in the mass adoption of artificial intelligence-driven stable coins: The quest for optimal resource utilization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Carlos Martín & Veronika Rudchenko & María-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull, 2020. "The Role of Nationality and Hotel Class on Guests’ Satisfaction. A Fuzzy-TOPSIS Approach Applied in Saint Petersburg," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Ping Wang & Jie Wang & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei, 2019. "Similarity Measures of q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets Based on Cosine Function and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Runtong Zhang & Jun Wang & Xiaomin Zhu & Meimei Xia & Ming Yu, 2017. "Some Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Aggregation Operators with Their Application to Multiattribute Group Decision-Making," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, August.
    4. Yuchu Qin & Xiaolan Cui & Meifa Huang & Yanru Zhong & Zhemin Tang & Peizhi Shi, 2019. "Archimedean Muirhead Aggregation Operators of q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Numbers for Multicriteria Group Decision Making," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-33, December.
    5. Tuyet Thi Anh Nguyen & Shuo-Yan Chou, 2022. "Fusion of interval-valued neutrosophic sets and financial assessment for optimal renewable energy portfolios with uncertainties," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(4), pages 783-808, June.
    6. Chunqiao Tan & Xiaohong Chen, 2016. "Generalized Archimedean Intuitionistic Fuzzy Averaging Aggregation Operators and their Application to Multicriteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 311-352, March.
    7. Shouzhen Zeng & Jianping Chen & Xingsen Li, 2016. "A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 403-422, March.
    8. Wei Yang & Yongfeng Pang, 2022. "T-Spherical Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-33, March.
    9. Qin, Quande & Liang, Fuqi & Li, Li & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Selection of energy performance contracting business models: A behavioral decision-making approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 422-433.
    10. Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Ahmadi, Hossein & Arji, Goli & Alsalem, Khalaf Okab & Samad, Sarminah & Ghabban, Fahad & Alzahrani, Ahmed Omar & Ahani, Ali & Alarood, Ala Abdulsalam, 2021. "Big social data and customer decision making in vegetarian restaurants: A combined machine learning method," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Peide Liu & Lili Zhang & Xi Liu & Peng Wang, 2016. "Multi-Valued Neutrosophic Number Bonferroni Mean Operators with their Applications in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 1181-1210, September.
    12. Wang Feng, 2019. "Aggregation Similarity Measure Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Closeness Degree and Its Application to Clustering Analysis," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 70-89, February.
    13. Mohsen Ahmadi, 2021. "A Computational Approach to Uncovering Economic Growth Factors," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 1051-1076, December.
    14. Yang Liu & Jian-Wu Bi & Zhi-Ping Fan, 2017. "A Method for Ranking Products Through Online Reviews Based on Sentiment Classification and Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1497-1522, November.
    15. Deng-Feng Li & Shu-Ping Wan, 2017. "Minimum Weighted Minkowski Distance Power Models for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Madm with Incomplete Weight Information," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1387-1408, September.
    16. José Vicens-Colom & Joe Holles & Vicente Liern, 2021. "Measuring Sustainability with Unweighted TOPSIS: An Application to Sustainable Tourism in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    17. Yalcin, Ahmet Selcuk & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk & Delen, Dursun, 2022. "The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Sujit Kumar De & Shib Sankar Sana, 2018. "The (p, q, r, l) model for stochastic demand under Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation with Bonferroni mean," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(8), pages 1753-1771, December.
    19. Usman Ali & Huseyin Arasli & Furkan Arasli & Mehmet Bahri Saydam & Emel Capkiner & Emel Aksoy & Guzide Atai, 2023. "Determinants and Impacts of Quality Attributes on Guest Perceptions in Norwegian Green Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    20. Cen Zuo & Anita Pal & Arindam Dey, 2019. "New Concepts of Picture Fuzzy Graphs with Application," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:7:y:2019:i:12:p:1150-:d:290394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.