IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i9p1474-d1646371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RBAU: Noval Redactable Model with Audit Mechanism and Key Update for Alliance Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Yineng Chen

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Women’s University, Changsha 410004, China
    College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Ting Guo

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Women’s University, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Qingshan Ren

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Women’s University, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Xiwen Yang

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Women’s University, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Xiaoxuan Chen

    (College of Information and Intelligence, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Shukun Liu

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Hunan Women’s University, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Fanzai Zeng

    (College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

Abstract

With the widespread application of alliance chain technology in diverse scenarios, its immutability has gradually revealed certain limitations in practical use. To address this challenge, a redactable alliance chain innovatively introduces functionalities for data modification, deletion, and updating. However, issues related to redaction permissions, auditing, and security hinder its development. To overcome these challenges, the K-medoids clustering algorithm is first employed to select a redaction center and a consensus committee. The redaction center reviews redaction requests, while the consensus committee groups redaction blocks and reaches block consensus. Next, a dual-hash function scheme is proposed, where a subkey-updatable chameleon hash function collaborates with a standard hash function. The system’s master key can revoke a user’s redaction rights by updating their subkey. Based on this framework, a block redaction strategy comprising four phases and nine execution algorithms is introduced, enabling an auditable, accountable, and subkey-updatable RBAU. Security analysis and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model excels in correctness, resistance to collision of the original key, resistance to collision of the updated key, user subkey updatability, and master key immutability. Additionally, the algorithm’s execution time, transaction execution time, block size, and redaction time are comparable to those of the pre-improvement alliance chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Yineng Chen & Ting Guo & Qingshan Ren & Xiwen Yang & Xiaoxuan Chen & Shukun Liu & Fanzai Zeng, 2025. "RBAU: Noval Redactable Model with Audit Mechanism and Key Update for Alliance Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:9:p:1474-:d:1646371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/9/1474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/9/1474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:9:p:1474-:d:1646371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.