IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i16p2545-d1458427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generating Stochastic Structural Planes Using Statistical Models and Generative Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Han Meng

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Nengxiong Xu

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yunfu Zhu

    (Geological Environment Monitoring Institute of Jiangxi Geological Survey and Exploration Institute, Nanchang 330006, China)

  • Gang Mei

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Structural planes are one of the key factors controlling the stability of rock masses. A comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution characteristics of structural planes is essential for accurately identifying key blocks, analyzing rock mass stability, and addressing various rock engineering challenges. This study compares the effectiveness of four stochastic structural plane generation methods—the Monte Carlo method, the Copula-based method, generative adversarial networks (GAN), and denoised diffusion models (DDPM)—in generating stochastic structural planes and capturing potential correlations between structural plane parameters. The Monte Carlo method employs the mean and variance of three parameters of the measured factual structural planes to generate data that follow the same distributions. The other three methods take the entire set of measured factual structural planes as the overall input to generate structural planes that exhibit the same probability distributions. Five sets of structural planes on four rock slopes in Norway are examined as an example. The validation and analysis were performed using histogram comparison, data feature comparison, scatter plot comparison, and linear regression analysis. The results show that the Monte Carlo method fails to capture the potential correlation between the dip direction and dip angle despite the best fit to the measured factual structural planes. The Copula-based method performs better with smaller datasets, and GAN and DDPM are better at capturing the correlation of measured factual structural planes in the case of large datasets. Therefore, in the case of a limited number of measured structural planes, it is advisable to employ the Copula-based method. In scenarios where the dataset is extensive, the deep generative model is recommended due to its ability to capture complex data structures. The results of this study can be utilized as a valuable point of reference for the accurate generation of stochastic structural planes within rock masses.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Meng & Nengxiong Xu & Yunfu Zhu & Gang Mei, 2024. "Generating Stochastic Structural Planes Using Statistical Models and Generative Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Investigation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-37, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2545-:d:1458427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/16/2545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Frazer & Pascal Notin & Mafalda Dias & Aidan Gomez & Joseph K. Min & Kelly Brock & Yarin Gal & Debora S. Marks, 2021. "Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data," Nature, Nature, vol. 599(7883), pages 91-95, November.
    2. Peng He & Li-ping Li & Gang Wang & Fei Xu & Shang-qu Sun, 2022. "Probabilistic prediction of the spatial distribution of potential key blocks during tunnel surrounding rock excavation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1721-1740, March.
    3. Hagspiel, Simeon & Papaemannouil, Antonis & Schmid, Matthias & Andersson, Göran, 2012. "Copula-based modeling of stochastic wind power in Europe and implications for the Swiss power grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 33-44.
    4. Grothe, Oliver & Schnieders, Julius, 2011. "Spatial Dependence in Wind and Optimal Wind Power Allocation: A Copula Based Analysis," EWI Working Papers 2011-5, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elberg, Christina & Hagspiel, Simeon, 2015. "Spatial dependencies of wind power and interrelations with spot price dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 260-272.
    2. Hain, Martin & Kargus, Tobias & Schermeyer, Hans & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Fichtner, Wolf, 2022. "An electricity price modeling framework for renewable-dominant markets," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 66, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    3. Nuño Martinez, Edgar & Cutululis, Nicolaos & Sørensen, Poul, 2018. "High dimensional dependence in power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 197-213.
    4. Fabrizio Durante & Angelica Gianfreda & Francesco Ravazzolo & Luca Rossini, 2022. "A Multivariate Dependence Analysis for Electricity Prices, Demand and Renewable Energy Sources," Papers 2201.01132, arXiv.org.
    5. Hain, Martin & Schermeyer, Hans & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Fichtner, Wolf, 2017. "An Electricity Price Modeling Framework for Renewable-Dominant Markets," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 23, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    6. Elberg, Christina & Hagspiel, Simeon, 2013. "Spatial Dependencies of Wind Power and Interrelations with Spot Price Dynamics," EWI Working Papers 2013-11, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    7. Xiao, Qing & Zhou, Shaowu, 2018. "Probabilistic power flow computation considering correlated wind speeds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 677-685.
    8. Wenkai Han & Ningning Chen & Xinzhou Xu & Adil Sahil & Juexiao Zhou & Zhongxiao Li & Huawen Zhong & Elva Gao & Ruochi Zhang & Yu Wang & Shiwei Sun & Peter Pak-Hang Cheung & Xin Gao, 2023. "Predicting the antigenic evolution of SARS-COV-2 with deep learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Rahimiyan, Morteza, 2014. "A statistical cognitive model to assess impact of spatially correlated wind production on market behaviors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 62-72.
    10. Di Somma, M. & Graditi, G. & Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Shafie-khah, M. & Siano, P., 2018. "Stochastic optimal scheduling of distributed energy resources with renewables considering economic and environmental aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 272-287.
    11. Hellwig, Michael & Schober, Dominik & Woll, Oliver, 2020. "Measuring market integration and estimating policy impacts on the Swiss electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    12. Álvarez-García, Francisco J. & Fresno-Schmolk, Gonzalo & OrtizBevia, María J. & Cabos, William & RuizdeElvira, Antonio, 2020. "Reduction of aggregate wind power variability using Empirical Orthogonal Teleconnections: An application in the Iberian Peninsula," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 151-161.
    13. Olauson, Jon & Bergkvist, Mikael, 2015. "Modelling the Swedish wind power production using MERRA reanalysis data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 717-725.
    14. Díaz, Guzmán & Moreno, Blanca & Coto, José & Gómez-Aleixandre, Javier, 2015. "Valuation of wind power distributed generation by using Longstaff–Schwartz option pricing method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 223-233.
    15. Shepero, Mahmoud & Munkhammar, Joakim & Widén, Joakim & Bishop, Justin D.K. & Boström, Tobias, 2018. "Modeling of photovoltaic power generation and electric vehicles charging on city-scale: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 61-71.
    16. Mads Raunbak & Timo Zeyer & Kun Zhu & Martin Greiner, 2017. "Principal Mismatch Patterns Across a Simplified Highly Renewable European Electricity Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Guoling Li & Xue Dong & Jiamin Luo & Tanglong Yuan & Tong Li & Guoli Zhao & Hainan Zhang & Jingxing Zhou & Zhenhai Zeng & Shuna Cui & Haoqiang Wang & Yin Wang & Yuyang Yu & Yuan Yuan & Erwei Zuo & Chu, 2024. "Engineering TadA ortholog-derived cytosine base editor without motif preference and adenosine activity limitation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    19. Lingling Bin & Haiyang Pan & Li He & Jijian Lian, 2019. "An Importance Analysis–Based Weight Evaluation Framework for Identifying Key Components of Multi-Configuration Off-Grid Wind Power Generation Systems under Stochastic Data Inputs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Jägemann, Cosima, 2014. "An illustrative note on the system price effect of wind and solar power - The German case," EWI Working Papers 2014-10, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:16:p:2545-:d:1458427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.