IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i13p2136-d1430482.html

Different Statistical Inference Algorithms for the New Pareto Distribution Based on Type-II Progressively Censored Competing Risk Data with Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Essam A. Ahmed

    (College of Business Administration, Taibah University, Al-Madina 41411, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Mathematics, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt)

  • Tariq S. Alshammari

    (Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Ha’il, Hail, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed S. Eliwa

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, College of Science, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

Abstract

In this research, the statistical inference of unknown lifetime parameters is proposed in the presence of independent competing risks using a progressive Type-II censored dataset. The lifetime distribution associated with a failure mode is assumed to follow the new Pareto distribution, with consideration given to two distinct competing failure reasons. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) for the unknown model parameters, as well as reliability and hazard functions, are derived, noting that they are not expressible in closed form. The Newton–Raphson, expectation maximization (EM), and stochastic expectation maximization (SEM) methods are employed to generate maximum likelihood (ML) estimations. Approximate confidence intervals for the unknown parameters, reliability, and hazard rate functions are constructed using the normal approximation of the MLEs and the normal approximation of the log-transformed MLEs. Additionally, the missing information principle is utilized to derive the closed form of the Fisher information matrix, which, in turn, is used with the delta approach to calculate confidence intervals for reliability and hazards. Bayes estimators are derived under both symmetric and asymmetric loss functions, with informative and non-informative priors considered, including independent gamma distributions for informative priors. The Monte Carlo Markov Chain sampling approach is employed to obtain the highest posterior density credible intervals and Bayesian point estimates for unknown parameters and reliability characteristics. A Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to assess the effectiveness of the proposed techniques, with the performances of the Bayes and maximum likelihood estimations examined using average values and mean squared errors as benchmarks. Interval estimations are compared in terms of average lengths and coverage probabilities. Real datasets are considered and examined for each topic to provide illustrative examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Essam A. Ahmed & Tariq S. Alshammari & Mohamed S. Eliwa, 2024. "Different Statistical Inference Algorithms for the New Pareto Distribution Based on Type-II Progressively Censored Competing Risk Data with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:2136-:d:1430482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/2136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/13/2136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Aslam Mohd Safari & Nurulkamal Masseran, 2024. "Robust estimation techniques for the tail index of the new Pareto-type distribution," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1161-1189, March.
    2. Ng, H. K. T. & Chan, P. S. & Balakrishnan, N., 2002. "Estimation of parameters from progressively censored data using EM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 371-386, June.
    3. Bourguignon, Marcelo & Saulo, Helton & Fernandez, Rodrigo Nobre, 2016. "A new Pareto-type distribution with applications in reliability and income data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 166-175.
    4. Balakrishnan, N. & Kateri, M., 2008. "On the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of Weibull distribution based on complete and censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(17), pages 2971-2975, December.
    5. Ali Saadati Nik & Akbar Asgharzadeh & Saralees Nadarajah, 2019. "Comparisons of Methods of Estimation for a New Pareto-type Distribution," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 79(3), pages 291-319.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Aslam Mohd Safari & Nurulkamal Masseran, 2024. "Robust estimation techniques for the tail index of the new Pareto-type distribution," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1161-1189, March.
    2. Fanqun Li & Shanran Wei & Mingtao Zhao, 2023. "Bayesian Estimation of a New Pareto-Type Distribution Based on Mixed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Saadati Nik, A. & Asgharzadeh, A. & Raqab, Mohammad Z., 2021. "Estimation and prediction for a new Pareto-type distribution under progressive type-II censoring," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 508-530.
    4. Pareek, Bhuvanesh & Kundu, Debasis & Kumar, Sumit, 2009. "On progressively censored competing risks data for Weibull distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4083-4094, October.
    5. Essam A. Ahmed, 2017. "Estimation and prediction for the generalized inverted exponential distribution based on progressively first-failure-censored data with application," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1576-1608, July.
    6. Balakrishnan, N. & Kundu, Debasis, 2013. "Hybrid censoring: Models, inferential results and applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 166-209.
    7. Balakrishnan, N. & Mitra, Debanjan, 2012. "Left truncated and right censored Weibull data and likelihood inference with an illustration," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4011-4025.
    8. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    9. Marcus Johnen & Stefan Bedbur & Udo Kamps, 2020. "A note on multiple roots of a likelihood equation for Weibull sequential order statistics," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 519-525, May.
    10. Benjamin Laumen & Erhard Cramer, 2021. "k‐step stage life testing," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 75(2), pages 203-233, May.
    11. Tzong-Ru Tsai & Yuhlong Lio & Jyun-You Chiang & Yi-Jia Huang, 2022. "A New Process Performance Index for the Weibull Distribution with a Type-I Hybrid Censoring Scheme," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Manoj Kumar & Sanjay Kumar Singh & Umesh Singh, 2018. "Bayesian inference for Poisson-inverse exponential distribution under progressive type-II censoring with binomial removal," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1235-1249, December.
    13. Balakrishnan, N. & Saleh, H.M., 2011. "Relations for moments of progressively Type-II censored order statistics from half-logistic distribution with applications to inference," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(10), pages 2775-2792, October.
    14. Ahmed Soliman & N. Abou-elheggag & A. Abd ellah & A. Modhesh, 2012. "Bayesian and non-Bayesian inferences of the Burr-XII distribution for progressive first-failure censored data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 70(1), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Meintanis, S.G. & Milošević, B. & Jiménez–Gamero, M.D., 2024. "Goodness–of–fit tests based on the min–characteristic function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. Wu, Shuo-Jye & Kus, Coskun, 2009. "On estimation based on progressive first-failure-censored sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3659-3670, August.
    17. Wu, Chien-Wei & Wang, To-Cheng & Chen, Rou-Hui, 2025. "Development of acceptance sampling plans under time-truncated life test for verifying product reliability using weibull-percentile lifetimes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    18. Alicja Jokiel-Rokita & Sylwester Pia̧tek, 2024. "Estimation of parameters and quantiles of the Weibull distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Prakash Chandra & Yogesh Mani Tripathi & Akbar Asgharzadeh, 2025. "Bayesian analysis and optimal life testing for new Pareto distribution under progressive censoring," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 83(3), pages 365-393, December.
    20. Katopodis, Theodoros & Markantonis, Iason & Vlachogiannis, Diamando & Politi, Nadia & Sfetsos, Athanasios, 2021. "Assessing climate change impacts on wind characteristics in Greece through high resolution regional climate modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 427-444.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:13:p:2136-:d:1430482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.