IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i6p1307-d1091469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Age of Infection Kernel, an R Formula, and Further Results for Arino–Brauer A , B Matrix Epidemic Models with Varying Populations, Waning Immunity, and Disease and Vaccination Fatalities

Author

Listed:
  • Florin Avram

    (Laboratoire de Mathématiques Appliquées, Université de Pau, 64012 Pau, France
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rim Adenane

    (Département des Mathématiques, Université Ibn-Tofail, Kenitra 14000, Morocco
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lasko Basnarkov

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Gianluca Bianchin

    (ICTEAM & Department Mathematical Engineering, University of Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dan Goreac

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
    Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées, Université Gustave Eiffel, 94010 Creteil, France
    Maître de Conférences HDR, UPEM, 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, France
    LAMA UMR8050, Université Paris Est Creteil, 94010 Creteil, France)

  • Andrei Halanay

    (Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In this work, we first introduce a class of deterministic epidemic models with varying populations inspired by Arino et al. (2007), the parameterization of two matrices, demography, the waning of immunity, and vaccination parameters. Similar models have been focused on by Julien Arino, Fred Brauer, Odo Diekmann, and their coauthors, but mostly in the case of “closed populations” (models with varying populations have been studied in the past only in particular cases, due to the difficulty of this endeavor). Our Arino–Brauer models contain SIR–PH models of Riano (2020), which are characterized by the phase-type distribution ( α → , A ) , modeling transitions in “disease/infectious compartments”. The A matrix is simply the Metzler/sub-generator matrix intervening in the linear system obtained by making all new infectious terms 0. The simplest way to define the probability row vector α → is to restrict it to the case where there is only one susceptible class s , and when matrix B (given by the part of the new infection matrix, with respect to s ) is of rank one, with B = b α → . For this case, the first result we obtained was an explicit formula (12) for the replacement number (not surprisingly, accounting for varying demography, waning immunity and vaccinations led to several nontrivial modifications of the Arino et al. (2007) formula). The analysis of ( A , B ) Arino–Brauer models is very challenging. As obtaining further general results seems very hard, we propose studying them at three levels: (A) the exact model, where only a few results are available—see Proposition 2; and (B) a “first approximation” (FA) of our model, which is related to the usually closed population model often studied in the literature. Notably, for this approximation, an associated renewal function is obtained in (7); this is related to the previous works of Breda, Diekmann, Graaf, Pugliese, Vermiglio, Champredon, Dushoff, and Earn. (C) Finally, we propose studying a second heuristic “intermediate approximation” (IA). Perhaps our main contribution is to draw attention to the importance of ( A , B ) Arino–Brauer models and that the FA approximation is not the only way to tackle them. As for the practical importance of our results, this is evident, once we observe that the ( A , B ) Arino–Brauer models include a large number of epidemic models (COVID, ILI, influenza, illnesses, etc.).

Suggested Citation

  • Florin Avram & Rim Adenane & Lasko Basnarkov & Gianluca Bianchin & Dan Goreac & Andrei Halanay, 2023. "An Age of Infection Kernel, an R Formula, and Further Results for Arino–Brauer A , B Matrix Epidemic Models with Varying Populations, Waning Immunity, and Disease and Vaccination Fatalities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1307-:d:1091469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1307/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1307/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. De la Sen & R. Nistal & S. Alonso-Quesada & A. Ibeas, 2019. "Some Formal Results on Positivity, Stability, and Endemic Steady-State Attainability Based on Linear Algebraic Tools for a Class of Epidemic Models with Eventual Incommensurate Delays," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-22, July.
    2. Fernando Alvarez & David Argente, 2020. "A Simple Planning Problem for COVID-19 Lockdown," Working Papers 2020-34, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    3. Jonathan Caulkins & Dieter Grass & Gustav Feichtinger & Richard Hartl & Peter M Kort & Alexia Prskawetz & Andrea Seidl & Stefan Wrzaczek, 2020. "How long should the COVID-19 lockdown continue?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Francesco Di Lauro & István Z Kiss & Joel C Miller, 2021. "Optimal timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florin Avram & Rim Adenane & Lasko Basnarkov, 2024. "Some Probabilistic Interpretations Related to the Next-Generation Matrix Theory: A Review with Examples," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caulkins, Jonathan P. & Grass, Dieter & Feichtinger, Gustav & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M. & Prskawetz, Alexia & Seidl, Andrea & Wrzaczek, Stefan, 2021. "The optimal lockdown intensity for COVID-19," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Christian Gollier, 2020. "Cost–benefit analysis of age‐specific deconfinement strategies," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(6), pages 1746-1771, December.
    3. Jacek Rothert, 2020. "Optimal federal redistribution during the uncoordinated response to a pandemic," Departmental Working Papers 64, United States Naval Academy Department of Economics.
    4. George, Ammu & Li, Changtai & Lim, Jing Zhi & Xie, Taojun, 2021. "From SARS to COVID-19: The evolving role of China-ASEAN production network," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Lee, Munseob & Finerman, Rachel, 2021. "COVID-19, commuting flows, and air quality," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Ichino, Andrea & Favero, Carlo A. & Rustichini, Aldo, 2020. "Restarting the economy while saving lives under Covid-19," CEPR Discussion Papers 14664, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Kumar, Anand & Priya, Bhawna & Srivastava, Samir K., 2021. "Response to the COVID-19: Understanding implications of government lockdown policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 76-94.
    8. David Baqaee & Emmanuel Farhi, 2020. "Nonlinear Production Networks with an Application to the Covid-19 Crisis," NBER Working Papers 27281, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Gottlieb Charles & Grobovšek Jan & Poschke Markus & Saltiel Fernando, 2022. "Lockdown Accounting," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 197-210, January.
    10. Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln & Dirk Krueger & André Kurmann & Etienne Lalé & Alexander Ludwig & Irina Popova, 2023. "The Fiscal and Welfare Effects of Policy Responses to the Covid-19 School Closures," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 71(1), pages 35-98, March.
    11. Basu, Sayantani & Campbell, Roy H., 2020. "Going by the numbers : Learning and modeling COVID-19 disease dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Houštecká, Anna & Koh, Dongya & Santaeulàlia-Llopis, Raül, 2021. "Contagion at work: Occupations, industries and human contact," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Gopal K. Basak & Chandramauli Chakraborty & Pranab Kumar Das, 2021. "Optimal Lockdown Strategy in a Pandemic: An Exploratory Analysis for Covid-19," Papers 2109.02512, arXiv.org.
    14. Pablo D. Fajgelbaum & Amit Khandelwal & Wookun Kim & Cristiano Mantovani & Edouard Schaal, 2021. "Optimal Lockdown in a Commuting Network," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 503-522, December.
    15. Giacomo Aletti & Alessandro Benfenati & Giovanni Naldi, 2021. "Graph, Spectra, Control and Epidemics: An Example with a SEIR Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(22), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Hortaçsu, Ali & Liu, Jiarui & Schwieg, Timothy, 2021. "Estimating the fraction of unreported infections in epidemics with a known epicenter: An application to COVID-19," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 106-129.
    17. Joshua Bernstein & Alexander W. Richter & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton, 2020. "COVID-19: A View from the Labor Market," Working Papers 2010, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    18. Muhammed A. Yildirim & Cem Cakmakli & Selva Demiralp & Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan & Sevcan Yesiltas, 2021. "The Economic Case for Global Vaccinations: An Epidemiological Model with International Production Networks," Growth Lab Working Papers 169, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    19. Linus Nyiwul, 2021. "Epidemic Control and Resource Allocation: Approaches and Implications for the Management of COVID-19," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 9(2), pages 283-305, December.
    20. Mauro Bambi & Daria Ghilli & Fausto Gozzi & Marta Leocata, 2021. "Habits and demand changes after COVID-19," Papers 2107.00909, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1307-:d:1091469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.