IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i21p4516-d1272655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Necessity-Based Optimization Approach for Closed-Loop Logistics Considering Carbon Emission Penalties and Rewards under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Botang Li

    (Department of Port & Shipping Management, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, China)

  • Kaiyuan Liu

    (Logistics Engineering and Simulation Laboratory, Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Qiong Chen

    (Navigation College, Jimei University, No.1 Jiageng Road, Jimei District, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Yui-yip Lau

    (Division of Business and Hospitality Management, College of Professional and Continuing Education, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Maxim A. Dulebenets

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida A&M University-Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA)

Abstract

The recycling of waste products can bring enormous economic and environmental benefits to supply chain participants. Under the government’s reward and punishment system, the manufacturing industry is facing unfolded pressure to minimize carbon emissions. However, various factors related to the design of closed-loop logistics networks are uncertain in nature, including demand, facility capacity, transportation cost per unit of product per kilometer, landfill cost, unit carbon penalty cost, and carbon reward amount. As such, this study proposes a new fuzzy programming model for closed-loop supply chain network design which directly relies on fuzzy methods based on the necessity measure. The objective of the proposed optimization model is to minimize the total cost of the network and the sum of carbon rewards and penalties when selecting facility locations and transportation routes between network nodes. Based on the characteristics of the problem, a genetic algorithm based on variant priority encoding is proposed as a solution. This new solution encoding method can make up for the shortcomings of the four traditional encoding methods (i.e., Prüfer number-based encoding, spanning tree-based encoding, forest data structure-based encoding, and priority-based encoding) to speed up the computational time of the solution algorithm. Several alternative solution approaches were considered to evaluate the proposed algorithm including the precision optimization method (CPLEX) and priority-based encoding genetic algorithm. The results of numerous experiments indicated that even for large-scale numerical examples, the proposed algorithm can create optimal and high-quality solutions within acceptable computational time. The applicability of the model was demonstrated through a sensitivity analysis which was conducted by changing the parameters of the model and providing some important management insights. When external parameters change, the solution of the model maintains a certain level of satisfaction conservatism. At the same time, the changes in the penalty cost and reward amount per unit of carbon emissions have a significant impact on the carbon penalty revenue and total cost. The results of this study are expected to provide scientific support to relevant supply chain enterprises and stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Botang Li & Kaiyuan Liu & Qiong Chen & Yui-yip Lau & Maxim A. Dulebenets, 2023. "A Necessity-Based Optimization Approach for Closed-Loop Logistics Considering Carbon Emission Penalties and Rewards under Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4516-:d:1272655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/21/4516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choudhary, Alok & Sarkar, Sagar & Settur, Srikar & Tiwari, M.K., 2015. "A carbon market sensitive optimization model for integrated forward–reverse logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 433-444.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, V.N.S.A. & Kumar, V. & Brady, M. & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Simpson, M., 2017. "Resolving forward-reverse logistics multi-period model using evolutionary algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 458-469.
    2. Tao, Yi & Wu, Jianhuang & Lai, Xiaofan & Wang, Fan, 2020. "Network planning and operation of sustainable closed-loop supply chains in emerging markets: Retail market configurations and carbon policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Reddy, K. Nageswara & Kumar, Akhilesh & Choudhary, Alok & Cheng, T. C. Edwin, 2022. "Multi-period green reverse logistics network design: An improved Benders-decomposition-based heuristic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 735-752.
    4. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    6. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Shaligram Pokharel & Fatih Mutlu, 2019. "The Design of Green Supply Chains under Carbon Policies: A Literature Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Olga Lingaitienė & Aurelija Burinskienė & Vida Davidavičienė, 2022. "Case Study of Municipal Waste and Its Reliance on Reverse Logistics in European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Waltho, Cynthia & Elhedhli, Samir & Gzara, Fatma, 2019. "Green supply chain network design: A review focused on policy adoption and emission quantification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 305-318.
    9. Shankar, Ravi & Pathak, Devendra Kumar & Choudhary, Devendra, 2019. "Decarbonizing freight transportation: An integrated EFA-TISM approach to model enablers of dedicated freight corridors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 85-100.
    10. Ahmad Alshamrani & Dipanjana Sengupta & Amrit Das & Uttam Kumar Bera & Ibrahim M. Hezam & Moddassir Khan Nayeem & Faisal Aqlan, 2023. "Optimal Design of an Eco-Friendly Transportation Network under Uncertain Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Ciardiello, F. & Genovese, A. & Simpson, A., 2019. "Pollution responsibility allocation in supply networks: A game-theoretic approach and a case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 211-217.
    12. Chen, Daqiang & Ignatius, Joshua & Sun, Danzhi & Zhan, Shalei & Zhou, Chenyu & Marra, Marianna & Demirbag, Mehmet, 2019. "Reverse logistics pricing strategy for a green supply chain: A view of customers' environmental awareness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 197-210.
    13. Qiang Du & Jiajie Zhou, 2022. "Evolution of Low Carbon Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Kadambala, Dinesh K. & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Tiwari, Manoj K. & Abdulrahman, Muhammad & Liu, Chang, 2017. "Closed loop supply chain networks: Designs for energy and time value efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 382-393.
    15. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Wei, Xiaoya & Lin, Jun & Tian, Xin & Lev, Benjamin & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Supply chain management under carbon taxes: A review and bibliometric analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Xiao-ping Bai & Xiu-weng Wang, 2020. "A Novel Planning Method of Urban Building Wastes for Environment Protection and Sustainable Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    17. Wang, Mingxi & Hu, Yi & Wang, Shouyang & Dang, Chuangyin, 2023. "The optimal carbon tax mechanism for managing carbon emissions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    18. Ozgur Kabadurmus & Mehmet S. Erdogan, 2020. "Sustainable, multimodal and reliable supply chain design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 47-70, September.
    19. Govindan, Kannan & Gholizadeh, Hadi, 2021. "Robust network design for sustainable-resilient reverse logistics network using big data: A case study of end-of-life vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Paweł Nowicki & Marek Ćwiklicki & Piotr Kafel & Janusz Niezgoda & Magdalena Wojnarowska, 2023. "The circular economy and its benefits for pro‐environmental companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4584-4599, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:21:p:4516-:d:1272655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.