IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i19p4051-d1246724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Fair-Workload Scheduling: A Case Study at Glorytek

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu-Chin Lin

    (Institute of Information Management, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan)

  • Bertrand M. T. Lin

    (Institute of Information Management, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan)

Abstract

Taichung is the center of the Taiwanese precision optical industry. Optics companies are modernized and automated, with most running 24 h production lines. With machines running around the clock, production lines must be assigned engineers to handle unexpected situations. The optical lens industry depends on precision technology. For fully automated production lines, each production process requires an engineer to be on call to troubleshoot production problems in real-time. However, shifts are currently scheduled manually, and the staff of each unit are responsible for scheduling the various production processes for each month. Administrative staff for each engineering department must take half a day to one day to complete the shift for a month, with results that usually do not ensure the best average workload, often leading engineers to question its fairness. Considering the manpower requirements for the actual production line shift and the fairness of balancing shifts, the scope of this study is the shift scheduling of engineering staff in the assembly line to perform different duties during a fixed cycle. The research aims to provide a solution for Glorytek to increase the efficiency of engineering shift scheduling and optimize the allocation of engineering staff. We will compare the duty allocation and efficiency of the current manual shift scheduling system with a new automated one. The results show that the efficiency of shift scheduling arrangements increased by more than 96%, and the maximum number of days of staff attendance (5 days) is less than that for manual assignment (6 days) while still satisfying the shift limits stipulated by the company. Two factors remain when implementing the proposed system. First, due to technical concerns, the internal process of the scheduling arrangement would be shifted from administrative staff to the IT department. Another concern is the inevitable investment in off-the-shelf optimization software.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu-Chin Lin & Bertrand M. T. Lin, 2023. "Optimal Fair-Workload Scheduling: A Case Study at Glorytek," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:19:p:4051-:d:1246724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/19/4051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/19/4051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hesham Alfares, 2004. "Survey, Categorization, and Comparison of Recent Tour Scheduling Literature," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 145-175, March.
    2. Stolletz, Raik & Brunner, Jens O., 2012. "Fair optimization of fortnightly physician schedules with flexible shifts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 622-629.
    3. Ernst, A. T. & Jiang, H. & Krishnamoorthy, M. & Sier, D., 2004. "Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 3-27, February.
    4. Frederick M Howard & Catherine A Gao & Christopher Sankey, 2020. "Implementation of an automated scheduling tool improves schedule quality and resident satisfaction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-9, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dina Bentayeb & Nadia Lahrichi & Louis-Martin Rousseau, 2023. "On integrating patient appointment grids and technologist schedules in a radiology center," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 62-78, March.
    2. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    3. Wang, Wenshu & Xie, Kexin & Guo, Siqi & Li, Weixing & Xiao, Fan & Liang, Zhe, 2023. "A shift-based model to solve the integrated staff rostering and task assignment problem with real-world requirements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 360-378.
    4. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    5. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    6. Melanie Erhard, 2021. "Flexible staffing of physicians with column generation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 212-252, March.
    7. Mauro Falasca & Christopher Zobel & Cliff Ragsdale, 2011. "Helping a Small Development Organization Manage Volunteers More Efficiently," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 254-262, June.
    8. Damcı-Kurt, Pelin & Zhang, Minjiao & Marentay, Brian & Govind, Nirmal, 2019. "Improving physician schedules by leveraging equalization: Cases from hospitals in U.S," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 182-193.
    9. Banu Sungur & Cemal Özgüven & Yasemin Kariper, 2017. "Shift scheduling with break windows, ideal break periods, and ideal waiting times," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 203-222, June.
    10. De Bruecker, Philippe & Beliën, Jeroen & Van den Bergh, Jorne & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2018. "A three-stage mixed integer programming approach for optimizing the skill mix and training schedules for aircraft maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 439-452.
    11. Doi, Tsubasa & Nishi, Tatsushi & Voß, Stefan, 2018. "Two-level decomposition-based matheuristic for airline crew rostering problems with fair working time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 428-438.
    12. Tristan Becker & Pia Mareike Steenweg & Brigitte Werners, 2019. "Cyclic shift scheduling with on-call duties for emergency medical services," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 676-690, December.
    13. Restrepo, María I. & Gendron, Bernard & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2017. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for multi-activity tour scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 620-635.
    14. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Roberta Rossi, 2022. "The emergency department physician rostering problem: obtaining equitable solutions via network optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 916-959, December.
    15. M J Brusco & T R Johns, 2011. "An integrated approach to shift-starting time selection and tour-schedule construction," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1357-1364, July.
    16. Falasca, Mauro & Zobel, Christopher, 2012. "An optimization model for volunteer assignments in humanitarian organizations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 250-260.
    17. Renata Mansini & Roberto Zanotti, 2020. "Optimizing the physician scheduling problem in a large hospital ward," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 337-361, June.
    18. Mark W. Isken & Osman T. Aydas, 2022. "A tactical multi-week implicit tour scheduling model with applications in healthcare," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 551-573, December.
    19. Mathirajan, M. & Ramanathan, R., 2007. "A (0-1) goal programming model for scheduling the tour of a marketing executive," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 554-566, June.
    20. Marta Rocha & José Oliveira & Maria Carravilla, 2014. "A constructive heuristic for staff scheduling in the glass industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 463-478, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:19:p:4051-:d:1246724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.