IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i24p4800-d1006124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Possibilities of Using Scoring to Determine the Relevance of Software Development Tenders

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Tikshaev

    (Faculty of Control Systems, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Roman Kulshin

    (Faculty of Control Systems, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Gennadii Volokitin

    (Faculty of Control Systems, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Pavel Senchenko

    (Faculty of Control Systems, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Anatoly Sidorov

    (Faculty of Control Systems, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

Abstract

The issue of searching for tender proposals satisfying the conditions of selection on the basis of the relevance assessment algorithm is considered. The algorithm is based on a mathematical scoring model. The approbation of the model based on the historical data of the software company is presented. The possibility of using such a method to determine relevance is proved. The assumption is made about the possibility of using scoring to evaluate tenders not only for the development of software products but also in other market segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Tikshaev & Roman Kulshin & Gennadii Volokitin & Pavel Senchenko & Anatoly Sidorov, 2022. "The Possibilities of Using Scoring to Determine the Relevance of Software Development Tenders," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4800-:d:1006124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/24/4800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Laborda & Seyong Ryoo, 2021. "Feature Selection in a Credit Scoring Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Thomas, Lyn C. & Edelman, David B. & Crook, Jonathan, 2004. "Readings in Credit Scoring: Foundations, Developments, and Aims," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198527978.
    3. Lessmann, Stefan & Baesens, Bart & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Thomas, Lyn C., 2015. "Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 124-136.
    4. Mohammad H. Saleh & Jamil J. Jaber & Abdullah A. Al-khawaldeh, 2016. "The Role of Credit Scoring, Cost and Product Discrimination in Improving the Competitiveness of Jordanian Insurance Companies," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 252-259, May.
    5. Lkhagvadorj Munkhdalai & Tsendsuren Munkhdalai & Oyun-Erdene Namsrai & Jong Yun Lee & Keun Ho Ryu, 2019. "An Empirical Comparison of Machine-Learning Methods on Bank Client Credit Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Laborda & Seyong Ryoo, 2021. "Feature Selection in a Credit Scoring Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Babaei, Golnoosh & Giudici, Paolo & Raffinetti, Emanuela, 2023. "Explainable FinTech lending," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 125.
    3. Oguz Koc & Omur Ugur & A. Sevtap Kestel, 2023. "The Impact of Feature Selection and Transformation on Machine Learning Methods in Determining the Credit Scoring," Papers 2303.05427, arXiv.org.
    4. Dangxing Chen & Weicheng Ye & Jiahui Ye, 2022. "Interpretable Selective Learning in Credit Risk," Papers 2209.10127, arXiv.org.
    5. Jonathan K. Budd & Peter G. Taylor, 2015. "Calculating optimal limits for transacting credit card customers," Papers 1506.05376, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    6. He, Ni & Yongqiao, Wang & Tao, Jiang & Zhaoyu, Chen, 2022. "Self-Adaptive bagging approach to credit rating," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Li, Yibei & Wang, Ximei & Djehiche, Boualem & Hu, Xiaoming, 2020. "Credit scoring by incorporating dynamic networked information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1103-1112.
    8. Davide Nicola Continanza & Andrea del Monaco & Marco di Lucido & Daniele Figoli & Pasquale Maddaloni & Filippo Quarta & Giuseppe Turturiello, 2023. "Stacking machine learning models for anomaly detection: comparing AnaCredit to other banking data sets," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Data science in central banking: applications and tools, volume 59, Bank for International Settlements.
    9. Lismont, Jasmien & Vanthienen, Jan & Baesens, Bart & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2017. "Defining analytics maturity indicators: A survey approach," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 114-124.
    10. Doumpos, Michalis & Zopounidis, Constantin & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Platanakis, Emmanouil & Zhang, Wenke, 2023. "Operational research and artificial intelligence methods in banking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Gunnarsson, Björn Rafn & vanden Broucke, Seppe & Baesens, Bart & Óskarsdóttir, María & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2021. "Deep learning for credit scoring: Do or don’t?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 292-305.
    12. Rasa Kanapickiene & Renatas Spicas, 2019. "Credit Risk Assessment Model for Small and Micro-Enterprises: The Case of Lithuania," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Zhou, Jing & Li, Wei & Wang, Jiaxin & Ding, Shuai & Xia, Chengyi, 2019. "Default prediction in P2P lending from high-dimensional data based on machine learning," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    14. Hu'e Sullivan & Hurlin Christophe & P'erignon Christophe & Saurin S'ebastien, 2022. "Measuring the Driving Forces of Predictive Performance: Application to Credit Scoring," Papers 2212.05866, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    15. De Caigny, Arno & Coussement, Kristof & De Bock, Koen W., 2018. "A new hybrid classification algorithm for customer churn prediction based on logistic regression and decision trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 760-772.
    16. Xin Xu & Feng Xiong & Zhe An, 2023. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Corporate Fraud: Evidence Based on the GONE Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 137-158, August.
    17. Cao Son Tran & Dan Nicolau & Richi Nayak & Peter Verhoeven, 2021. "Modeling Credit Risk: A Category Theory Perspective," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Sigrist, Fabio & Leuenberger, Nicola, 2023. "Machine learning for corporate default risk: Multi-period prediction, frailty correlation, loan portfolios, and tail probabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1390-1406.
    19. Matthias Bogaert & Lex Delaere, 2023. "Ensemble Methods in Customer Churn Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of the State-of-the-Art," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, February.
    20. Aggarwal, Nidhi & Singh, Manish K. & Thomas, Susan, 2023. "Do decreases in Distance-to-Default predict rating downgrades?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:24:p:4800-:d:1006124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.