IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i3p99-d1711791.html

Achieving Sustainable Supply Chains: Applying Group Concept Mapping to Prioritize and Implement Sustainable Management Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Thompson McDaniel

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Business Informatics, Corvinus University of Budapest, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Edit Süle

    (Department of Corporate Leadership and Marketing, Széchenyi István University, H-9026 Győr, Hungary)

  • Gyula Vastag

    (Department of Public Administration and Infotechnology, Ludovika University of Public Service, H-1581 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

Background : Sustainability in supply chain management (SCM) practices is becoming increasingly important as environmental responsibility and social concerns, as well as enterprises’ competitiveness in terms of innovation, risk, and economic performance, become increasingly urgent. This paper aims to identify and prioritize concepts for implementing sustainable supply chains, drawing on sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) and green supply chain management (GSCM) techniques. Corporate supply chain managers across various industries, markets, and supply chain segments brainstormed management practices to enhance the sustainability of their supply chains. Four industry sectors were surveyed across five different value chain segments. Methods: A group concept mapping (GCM) approach incorporating multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was used. A hierarchy of practices is proposed, and hypotheses are developed about achievability and impact. Results: A decision-making matrix prioritizes eight solution concepts based on two axes: impact (I) and ease of implementation (EoI). Conclusions: Eight concepts are prioritized based on the optimal effectiveness of implementing the solutions. Pattern matching reveals differences between emerging and developed markets, as well as supply chain segments, that decision-makers should be aware of. By analyzing supply chains from a multi-part perspective, this research goes beyond empirical studies based on a single industry, geographic region, or example case.

Suggested Citation

  • Thompson McDaniel & Edit Süle & Gyula Vastag, 2025. "Achieving Sustainable Supply Chains: Applying Group Concept Mapping to Prioritize and Implement Sustainable Management Practices," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:99-:d:1711791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/99/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/3/99/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Seuring & Martin Müller, 2008. "Core issues in sustainable supply chain management – a Delphi study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(8), pages 455-466, December.
    2. Ladinig, Thomas B. & Vastag, Gyula, 2021. "Mapping quality linkages based on tacit knowledge," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Katarzyna Wojtaszczyk & Izabela Różańska‐Bińczyk & Marzena Syper‐Jędrzejak, 2024. "Human resource management: A link between sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles. Traditional and systematic review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5567-5580, October.
    4. Dumont, Jeanne, 1989. "Validity of multidimensional scaling in the context of structured conceptualization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 81-86, January.
    5. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & Panos T. Chountalas, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainable Supply Chain Management through Digital Transformation: A Comparative Case Study Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Trochim, William M. K. & Linton, Rhoda, 1986. "Conceptualization for planning and evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 289-308, January.
    7. Peter Dobers & Rolf Wolff, 2000. "Competing with ‘soft’ issues – from managing the environment to sustainable business strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 143-150, May.
    8. Anup Kumar & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Avinash K. Shrivastava & Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Rondinelli, Dennis & Vastag, Gyula, 2000. "Panacea, common sense, or just a label?: The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 499-510, October.
    10. Ahmed Dabees & Mahmoud Barakat & Sahar Sobhy Elbarky & Andrej Lisec, 2023. "A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Reverse Logistics Service Quality for Reverse Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Sarkis, Joseph & Zhu, Qinghua & Lai, Kee-hung, 2011. "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Jabbour, Charbel & Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Arantes, Ariana Fernandes, 2014. "Mixed methodology to analyze the relationship between maturity of environmental management and the adoption of green supply chain management in Brazil," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 255-267.
    13. Dayal S. Prasad & Rudra P. Pradhan & Kunal Gaurav & Partha P. Chatterjee & Inderpal Kaur & Saurav Dash & Sagar Nayak, 2018. "Analysing the critical success factors for implementation of sustainable supply chain management: an Indian case study," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 45(1), pages 3-25, March.
    14. Marcus Brandenburg & Tobias Rebs, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain management: a modeling perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 213-252, June.
    15. Jianwei Li & Deyu Zhong, 2024. "Comparing the Impact of Green Supplier Selection and Integration on Environmental Performance: An Analysis of the Moderating Role of Government Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Samera Nazir & Li Zhaolei & Saqib Mehmood & Zarish Nazir, 2024. "Impact of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on the Environmental Performance of Manufacturing Firms Considering Institutional Pressure as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-30, March.
    17. Rondinelli, Dennis A. & Vastag, Gyula, 1998. "Private investment and environmental protection:: Alcoa-Köfém's strategy in Hungary," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 422-430, August.
    18. Dominik Zimon & Jonah Tyan & Robert Sroufe, 2019. "Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Vichathorn Piyathanavong & Sun Olapiriyakul & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Vikas Kumar & Van‐Nam Huynh & Jessada Karnjana, 2024. "Implementing Industry 4.0 and circular economy through the developmental culture perspective—Driving a competitive advantage in the manufacturing industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 9059-9074, December.
    20. Ehsan Shekarian & Behrang Ijadi & Amirreza Zare & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    21. Trochim, William M. & McLinden, Daniel, 2017. "Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 166-175.
    22. Robert D. Klassen & Curtis P. McLaughlin, 1996. "The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(8), pages 1199-1214, August.
    23. Federico Solari & Natalya Lysova & Giovanni Romagnoli & Roberto Montanari & Eleonora Bottani, 2024. "Insights from 20 Years (2004–2023) of Supply Chain Disruption Research: Trends and Future Directions Based on a Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolin Brix-Asala & Anne-Kristin Geisbüsch & Philipp Christopher Sauer & Patrick Schöpflin & Axel Zehendner, 2018. "Sustainability Tensions in Supply Chains: A Case Study of Paradoxes and Their Management," Post-Print hal-03891228, HAL.
    2. Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2015. "Sharing environmental management information with supply chain partners and the performance contingencies on environmental munificence," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 445-453.
    3. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed, 2020. "Impact of environmental policy on firm's market performance: The case of ISO 14001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 681-693, March.
    4. Ehsan Shekarian & Behrang Ijadi & Amirreza Zare & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Schrettle, Stefan & Hinz, Andreas & Scherrer -Rathje, Maike & Friedli, Thomas, 2014. "Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms' sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 73-84.
    6. Orcos, Raquel & Pérez-Aradros, Beatriz & Blind, Knut, 2018. "Why does the diffusion of environmental management standards differ across countries? The role of formal and informal institutions in the adoption of ISO 14001," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 850-861.
    7. Wencheng Zhang & Fengjuan Zhang & Zhuo Cheng, 2025. "Green entrepreneurial orientation and green human capital: unlocking the potential of green supply chain integration through corporate environmental strategy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Małgorzata Ćwil & Witold Bartnik & Sebastian Jarzębowski, 2021. "Railway Vehicle Energy Efficiency as a Key Factor in Creating Sustainable Transportation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Soh Hyun Chu & Hongsuk Yang & Mansokku Lee & Sangwook Park, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Joaquín Cañón-de-Francia & Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe, 2009. "ISO 14001 Environmental Certification: A Sign Valued by the Market?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 44(2), pages 245-262, October.
    11. Kimitaka Nishitani, 2011. "An Empirical Analysis of the Effects on Firms’ Economic Performance of Implementing Environmental Management Systems," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(4), pages 569-586, April.
    12. Marta Roczniewska & Emma Hedberg Rundgren & Henna Hasson & Arnold B. Bakker & Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, 2022. "How Should Job Crafting Interventions Be Implemented to Make Their Effects Last? Protocol for a Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    13. Ozden Tozanli & Gazi Murat Duman & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2017. "Environmentally Concerned Logistics Operations in Fuzzy Environment: A Literature Survey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-42, June.
    14. Reham Alhindawi & Yousef Abu Nahleh & Arun Kumar, 2025. "Navigating Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Perfume Industry: Challenges and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-30, January.
    15. Thomas Thurner & Liliana Nikolaevna Proskuryakova, 2014. "Out of the Cold – the Rising Importance of Environmental Management in the Corporate Governance of Russian Oil and Gas Producers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 318-332, July.
    16. Sang M. Lee & Yonghwi Noh & Donghyun Choi & Jin Sung Rha, 2017. "Environmental Policy Performances for Sustainable Development: From the Perspective of ISO 14001 Certification," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 108-120, March.
    17. Harry Bremmers & Onno Omta & Ron Kemp & Derk‐Jan Haverkamp, 2007. "Do stakeholder groups influence environmental management system development in the Dutch agri‐food sector?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 214-231, March.
    18. Peter Oberhofer & Elmar Fürst, 2013. "Sustainable Development in the Transport Sector: Influencing Environmental Behaviour and Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6), pages 374-389, September.
    19. Ahmed Attia, 2023. "Effect of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Customer Relationship Management on Organizational Performance in the Context of the Egyptian Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Md Ali Arshad Chowdhury & Mohammad Morshedur Rahman & Mouri Dey & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq & Sk Alamgir Hossain, 2023. "Perceived Pressures and Motivations for Environmental Disclosures: Role of Certification," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:3:p:99-:d:1711791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.