IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v8y2024i4p107-d1501947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Residual Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Model Using AnyLogistix: A Methodical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bernardine Chidozie

    (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), Departmento de Economia, Gestao, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo (DEGEIT), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Ana Ramos

    (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), Departmento de Economia, Gestao, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo (DEGEIT), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • José Vasconcelos

    (Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), Departmento de Economia, Gestao, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo (DEGEIT), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Luis Pinto Ferreira

    (School of Engineering, Polytechnic of Porto (ISEP), Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, Associate Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aerospace (LAETA-INEGI), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Background: In the pursuit of sustainable energy sources, residual biomass has emerged as a promising renewable resource. However, efficiently managing residual biomass poses significant challenges, particularly in optimizing supply chain operations. Advanced modeling approaches are necessary to address these complexities. This study aims to develop a comprehensive methodological framework for creating simulation models tailored to agroforestry residual biomass supply chains. Methods: The study employs a hybrid simulation approach, integrating geographic information system mapping with a case study analysis. The simulation was conducted over a 365-day period, using the anyLogistix software (version 2.15.3.202209061204) to model various supply chain dynamics. The framework also accounts for financial, operational, customer satisfaction, and environmental metrics. Results: The simulation results showed a total expenditure of EUR 5,219,411.3, with transportation being the primary cost driver, involving 5678 trips and a peak capacity of 67.16 m 3 . CO 2 emissions were measured at 487.7 kg/m 3 . The model performed as expected, highlighting the need for sustainable logistics strategies to reduce costs, lower losses, and improve productivity. Conclusions: This study presents one of the first detailed methodological frameworks for simulating agroforestry residual biomass supply chains. It provides valuable managerial insights into the financial, operational, and environmental aspects of supply chain management. The findings may stakeholders make informed decisions to enhance the sustainability of biomass utilization in energy production.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernardine Chidozie & Ana Ramos & José Vasconcelos & Luis Pinto Ferreira, 2024. "Development of a Residual Biomass Supply Chain Simulation Model Using AnyLogistix: A Methodical Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:107-:d:1501947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/4/107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aalto, Mika & KC, Raghu & Korpinen, Olli-Jussi & Karttunen, Kalle & Ranta, Tapio, 2019. "Modeling of biomass supply system by combining computational methods – A review article," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 145-154.
    2. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Vitale, Ignacio & Dondo, Rodolfo G. & González, Matías & Cóccola, Mariana E., 2022. "Modelling and optimization of material flows in the wood pellet supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    4. Wu, Juanjuan & Zhang, Jian & Yi, Weiming & Cai, Hongzhen & Li, Yang & Su, Zhanpeng, 2022. "Agri-biomass supply chain optimization in north China: Model development and application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    5. Tiago Bastos & Leonor C. Teixeira & João C. O. Matias & Leonel J. R. Nunes, 2023. "Agroforestry Biomass Recovery Supply Chain Management: A More Efficient Information Flow Model Based on a Web Platform," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Sandra Silva, 2023. "Optimization of the Residual Biomass Supply Chain: Process Characterization and Cost Analysis," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basile, Flavia & Pilotti, Lorenzo & Ugolini, Marco & Lozza, Giovanni & Manzolini, Giampaolo, 2022. "Supply chain optimization and GHG emissions in biofuel production from forestry residues in Sweden," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 405-421.
    2. Timur Kogabayev & Anne Põder & Henrik Barth & Rando Värnik, 2023. "Prospects for Wood Pellet Production in Kazakhstan: A Case Study on Business Model Adjustment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Youngjin Kim & Sojung Kim, 2025. "Optimization and Simulation in Biofuel Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Jan Banaś & Katarzyna Utnik-Banaś & Stanisław Zięba, 2024. "Optimizing Biomass Supply Chains to Power Plants under Ecological and Social Restrictions: Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Lin, Jun & Li, Yanan & Qian, Yanjun & Liu, Guoquan, 2024. "Effectiveness of government subsidies for biomass-based industries: Incorporating the feedstock acquisition process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Zhao, Guanhan & Jiang, Peng & Zhang, Hao & Li, Lin & Ji, Tuo & Mu, Liwen & Lu, Xiaohua & Zhu, Jiahua, 2024. "Mapping out the regional low-carbon and economic biomass supply chain by aligning geographic information systems and life cycle assessment models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).
    7. Hugo Guzmán-Bello & Iosvani López-Díaz & Miguel Aybar-Mejía & Jose Atilio de Frias, 2022. "A Review of Trends in the Energy Use of Biomass: The Case of the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, March.
    8. Ignacio Vitale & Mariana E. Cóccola & Rodolfo G. Dondo, 2024. "Assessing the benefits of storage and transshipments yards in timber supply chains by a column generation + grasp approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 373-403, January.
    9. Olabi, A.G. & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Renewable energy and climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Klimenko, V.V. & Krasheninnikov, S.M. & Fedotova, E.V., 2022. "CHP performance under the warming climate: a case study for Russia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    11. Ekaterina A. Syrtsova & Ekaterina D. Ivantsova & Alexandra S. Miskiv & Evgeniya V. Zander & Anton I. Pyzhev, 2024. "Costs of Coal Abatement for Residential Heating to Reduce Urban Air Pollution in Asian Russia: Evidence from Krasnoyarsk," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Chenglin Ma & Xurui Gao & Lin Zhang & Wenchao Kang, 2024. "Optimizing Timber Supply Chains: Exploring the Potential of Digital Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Fragkoulis Psathas & Paraskevas N. Georgiou & Athanasios Rentizelas, 2022. "Optimizing the Design of a Biomass-to-Biofuel Supply Chain Network Using a Decentralized Processing Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Martinez-Valencia, Lina & Garcia-Perez, Manuel & Wolcott, Michael P., 2021. "Supply chain configuration of sustainable aviation fuel: Review, challenges, and pathways for including environmental and social benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Pietrzak, Michał Bernard & Kiełkowska, Urszula & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Piechota, Grzegorz, 2022. "The assessment of renewable energy in Poland on the background of the world renewable energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    16. Zaher Abusaq & Muhammad Salman Habib & Adeel Shehzad & Mohammad Kanan & Ramiz Assaf, 2022. "A Flexible Robust Possibilistic Programming Approach toward Wood Pellets Supply Chain Network Design," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Ye, Lian & Zhang, Jianliang & Wang, Guangwei & Wang, Chen & Mao, Xiaoming & Ning, Xiaojun & Zhang, Nan & Teng, Haipeng & Li, Jinhua & Wang, Chuan, 2023. "Feasibility analysis of plastic and biomass hydrochar for blast furnace injection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    18. Bernardine Chidozie & Ana Ramos & José Vasconcelos & Luis Pinto Ferreira & Reinaldo Gomes, 2024. "Highlighting Sustainability Criteria in Residual Biomass Supply Chains: A Dynamic Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    19. Zhang, Huan & Duan, Xianglei & Jiang, Jianli, 2024. "Fixed rebate subsidy vs. unit price subsidy: Incentive effect on the biomass power supply chain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Hatice Güneş Yıldız & Berk Ayvaz & Ali Osman Kuşakcı & Muhammet Deveci & Harish Garg, 2024. "Sustainability assessment of biomass-based energy supply chain using multi-objective optimization model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 15451-15493, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:8:y:2024:i:4:p:107-:d:1501947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.