IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v7y2023i1p17-d1097679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0 and Industrial Robots: A Study from the Perspective of Manufacturing Company Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Şemsettin Çiğdem

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
    Sustainable Development Research Center, Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkestan 161200, Kazakhstan)

  • Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Bülent Yıldız

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kastamonu University, 37150 Kastamonu, Turkey)

Abstract

Background: Human–robot collaboration is essential for efficient manufacturing and logistics as robots are increasingly used. Using industrial robots as part of an automation system results in many competitive benefits, including improved quality, efficiency, productivity, and reduced waste and errors. When robots are used in production, human coworkers’ psychological factors can disrupt operations. This study aims to examine the effect of employees’ negative attitudes toward robots on their acceptance of robot technology in manufacturing workplaces. Methods: A survey was conducted with employees in manufacturing companies to collect data on their attitudes towards robots and their willingness to work with them. Data was collected from 499 factory workers in Istanbul using a convenience sampling method, which allowed for the measurement of variables and the analysis of their effects on each other. To analyze the data, structural equation modeling was used. Results: The results indicate that negative attitudes towards robots have a significant negative effect on the acceptance of robot technology in manufacturing workplaces. However, trust in robots was found to be a positive predictor of acceptance. Conclusions: These findings have important implications for manufacturing companies seeking to integrate robot technology into their operations. Addressing employees’ negative attitudes towards robots and building trust in robot technology can increase the acceptance of robots in manufacturing workplaces, leading to improved efficiency and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Şemsettin Çiğdem & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Bülent Yıldız, 2023. "Industry 4.0 and Industrial Robots: A Study from the Perspective of Manufacturing Company Employees," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:17-:d:1097679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/1/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/1/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronan de Kervenoael & Rajibul Hasan & Alexandre Schwob & Edwin Goh, 2020. "Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitors’ intentions to use social robots," Post-Print hal-02782265, HAL.
    2. Ballestar, María Teresa & Díaz-Chao, Ángel & Sainz, Jorge & Torrent-Sellens, Joan, 2021. "Impact of robotics on manufacturing: A longitudinal machine learning perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Şemsettin Çiğdem & Bülent Yıldız & Sigitas Davidavicius, 2021. "The Effect of Perceptions on Service Robot Usage Intention: A Survey Study in the Service Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    2. Zhu, Yimin & Zhang, Jiemin & Wu, Jifei & Liu, Yingyue, 2022. "AI is better when I'm sure: The influence of certainty of needs on consumers' acceptance of AI chatbots," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 642-652.
    3. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Antonio Ariza Montes & Heesup Han, 2021. "The Role of Expected Benefits towards Smart Hotels in Shaping Customer Behavior: Comparison by Age and Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Manthiou, Aikaterini & Klaus, Phil, 2022. "The interplaying factors of the robotic tourism experience: The customer journey's touchpoints, context, and qualities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Gyutae Lee & Yunsik Kim, 2022. "Effects of Resistance Barriers to Service Robots on Alternative Attractiveness and Intention to Use," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    7. Farrukh Rafiq & Nikhil Dogra & Mohd Adil & Jei-Zheng Wu, 2022. "Examining Consumer’s Intention to Adopt AI-Chatbots in Tourism Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Kichan Nam & Christopher S. Dutt & Prakash Chathoth & Abdelkader Daghfous & M. Sajid Khan, 2021. "The adoption of artificial intelligence and robotics in the hotel industry: prospects and challenges," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 553-574, September.
    9. Tianyang Huang, 2022. "What Affects the Acceptance and Use of Hotel Service Robots by Elderly Customers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Liu, Xing (Stella) & Yi, Xiao (Shannon) & Wan, Lisa C., 2022. "Friendly or competent? The effects of perception of robot appearance and service context on usage intention," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Zhu, Tengteng & Lin, Zhibin & Liu, Xin, 2023. "The future is now? Consumers' paradoxical expectations of human-like service robots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Alzahrani, Ahmed Ibrahim & Al-Samarraie, Hosam & Eldenfria, Atef & Dodoo, Joana Eva & Alalwan, Nasser, 2022. "Users’ intention to continue using mHealth services: A DEMATEL approach during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Ola Abdel Moneim Emara & Hazem Tawfik Halim & Mohamed Samy El-Deeb & Yasser Tawfik Halim, 2023. "Toward a sustained recovery of the lodging sector: a management path to lessen the Corona Variants upshots," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Chris Roberts & Joel Reynolds & Mary Jo Dolasinski, 2022. "Meta-Analysis of Tourism Sustainability Research: 2019–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Joan Torrent‐Sellens & Pilar Ficapal‐Cusí & Mihaela Enache‐Zegheru, 2023. "Boosting environmental management: The mediating role of Industry 4.0 between environmental assets and economic and social firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 753-768, January.
    16. Ballestar, María Teresa & García-Lazaro, Aida & Sainz, Jorge & Sanz, Ismael, 2022. "Why is your company not robotic? The technology and human capital needed by firms to become robotic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 328-343.
    17. Sandra Maria Correia Loureiro & Jorge Nascimento, 2021. "Shaping a View on the Influence of Technologies on Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Youssef, Mayada Abd El-Aziz & Eid, Riyad & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "Cross-national differences in big data analytics adoption in the retail industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Martina Nannelli & Francesco Capone & Luciana Lazzeretti, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis on Artificial intelligence in Tourism. State of the art and future research avenues," Working Papers - Business wp2022_03.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    20. Song, Jinzhu & Gao, Yanhuan & Huang, Youlin & Chen, Lihan, 2023. "Being friendly and competent: Service robots' proactive behavior facilitates customer value co-creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:17-:d:1097679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.