IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1449-d1699813.html

Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model

Author

Listed:
  • Gyoungju Lee

    (Department of Urban and Transportation Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Republic of Korea)

  • Youngeun Kang

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52725, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study proposes a novel method to assess urban park accessibility by incorporating perceived utility based on both park area and distance. Departing from conventional models that treat accessibility as a function of geometric proximity alone, we define park utility as a distance-discounted benefit of park area, thereby allowing for a more behaviorally grounded measure. A customized discounting function is introduced, where larger park sizes proportionally reduce perceived travel cost, and walking speed adjustments are applied based on demographic user profiles (children, adults, and older adults). The methodology was implemented using a Python-based v.3.12.9 geospatial workflow with network-based distance calculations between 18,614 census block groups and all urban parks in Seoul. Population-weighted utility scores were computed by integrating park size, distance, and age-specific mobility adjustments. The results reveal significant intra-urban disparities, with a citywide deficit of 4,066,046 m in population-weighted distance, particularly in areas with large populations but insufficient proximity to high-utility parks. Simulation analyses of 30 candidate sites demonstrate that strategic park placement can yield substantial utility improvements (maximum gain: 493,436 m), while indiscriminate expansion may not. These findings offer spatial decision support for optimizing limited public resources in urban green infrastructure planning and underscore the need to consider both park scale and user-specific walking behavior in evaluating accessibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Gyoungju Lee & Youngeun Kang, 2025. "Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1449-:d:1699813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1449/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1449/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeonghee Choi & Gunwoo Kim, 2022. "History of Seoul’s Parks and Green Space Policies: Focusing on Policy Changes in Urban Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Leonardo Nicoletti & Mikhail Sirenko & Trivik Verma, 2023. "Disadvantaged communities have lower access to urban infrastructure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(3), pages 831-849, March.
    3. Keunhyun Park, 2017. "Psychological park accessibility: a systematic literature review of perceptual components affecting park use," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 508-520, July.
    4. Weicong Luo & Huan Chen & Zihan Yang & Jinhao Liu, 2024. "Accessibility and Equity of Park Green Spaces: Considering Differences in Walking Speeds Across Age Groups," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Alessandro Rigolon & Matthew H. E. M. Browning & Olivia McAnirlin & Hyunseo (Violet) Yoon, 2021. "Green Space and Health Equity: A Systematic Review on the Potential of Green Space to Reduce Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Towards net-zero emissions: Can green bond policy promote green innovation and green space?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    3. Leiting Cen & Yang Xiao, 2025. "Assessing Urban Park Accessibility via Population Projections: Planning for Green Equity in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Rahman, Fabiha & Oliver, Robert & Buehler, Ralph & Lee, Jinhyung & Crawford, Thomas & Kim, Junghwan, 2025. "Impacts of point of interest (POI) data selection on 15-Minute City (15-MC) accessibility scores and inequality assessments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Lingfang Shao & Zhengxian Liu & Zijin Zhou, 2024. "Examining How Urban Public Spaces and Virtual Spaces Affect Public Opinion in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Yuhong Tian & Fenghua Liu & Chi Yung Jim & Tiantian Wang & Jingya Luan & Mengxuan Yan, 2022. "Effects of Self-Rated Health Status on Residents’ Social-Benefit Perceptions of Urban Green Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Gallez, Elsa & Canters, Frank & Gadeyne, Sylvie & Baró, Francesc, 2024. "A multi-indicator distributive justice approach to assess school-related green infrastructure benefits in Brussels," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Lisa Dandolo & Christina Hartig & Klaus Telkmann & Sophie Horstmann & Lars Schwettmann & Peter Selsam & Alexandra Schneider & Gabriele Bolte & on behalf of the INGER Study Group, 2022. "Decision Tree Analyses to Explore the Relevance of Multiple Sex/Gender Dimensions for the Exposure to Green Spaces: Results from the KORA INGER Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Lisa Dandolo & Klaus Telkmann & Christina Hartig & Sophie Horstmann & Sara Pedron & Lars Schwettmann & Peter Selsam & Alexandra Schneider & Gabriele Bolte & on behalf of the INGER Study Group, 2023. "Do Multiple Sex/Gender Dimensions Play a Role in the Association of Green Space and Self-Rated Health? Model-Based Recursive Partitioning Results from the KORA INGER Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Khaled Ali Abuhasel, 2023. "Assessing Public Service Distribution in Abha and Bisha Cities, Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    11. El Murr, Karl & Boisjoly, Genevieve & Waygood, E.O.D., 2023. "Measuring accessibility to parks: Analyzing the relationship between self-reported and calculated measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Ursula Pool & Anna Kenyon & Lynn Froggett & Mark Dooris, 2023. "Beside the Seaside: Reflections on Local Green and Blue Spaces from Adults Aged over 50 in a Coastal Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Samieul Azad & Melissa Marselle, 2025. "Thriving Through Stressful Life Events with Nature: A Mixed-Method Study on Tending Indoor Plants and Rumination Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-37, March.
    14. Zhen Yin & Lifei Wang & Zhen Xu, 2025. "Retrofit-Oriented Large Parks’ Walking-Shed Evaluation—A Case Study of Rizhao, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita & Noszczyk, Tomasz & Gorzelany, Julia & Młocek, Wojciech, 2024. "Greenery in times of crisis: Accessibility, residents' travel preferences and the impact of travel time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    16. Shibao Yu & Peng Zeng & Xiaoling Xie & Dandan Chen, 2024. "Equitable evaluation of supply-demand and layout optimization of urban park green space in high-density linear large city," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-27, September.
    17. Alessandro Rigolon & Timothy Collins, 2023. "The green gentrification cycle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 770-785, March.
    18. Liu, Qiyang & Ma, Tianyu & Jiang, Shixiong, 2026. "Running with the shadows of the night: Transport justice issues faced by sex workers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Shi, Yuji & Blainey, Simon & Sun, Chao & Jing, Peng, 2020. "A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    20. Derrien, Monika M. & Bratman, Gregory N. & Cerveny, Lee K. & Levy, Chaja & Blahna, Dale J. & Frank, Paulo & Serio, Naomi, 2024. "Public nature and health for homeless populations: Professionals’ perceptions of contingent human benefits and harms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1449-:d:1699813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.