IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1221-d1673104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Landscape Risks and Ecological Security Patterns in the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, China

Author

Listed:
  • Peiyu He

    (Social Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Longhao Wang

    (Social Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Siqi Zhai

    (Social Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China)

  • Yanlong Guo

    (National Cultural Creative Industry Research Center, Xinjiang Hetian College, Hetian 848000, China)

  • Jie Huang

    (Psychology Department, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK)

Abstract

Ecological risk refers to the potential threat that landscape changes pose to ecosystem structure, function, and service sustainability, while ecological security emphasizes the ability of regional ecosystems to maintain stability and support human well-being. Developing an Ecological Security Pattern (ESP) provides a strategic approach to balance ecological protection and sustainable development. This study investigates the spatial and temporal dynamics of landscape ecological risk in the Tarim Basin and surrounding urban areas in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, from 2000 to 2020. Using a combination of the InVEST model, landscape connectivity index, and circuit theory-based modeling, we identify ecological source areas and simulate ecological corridors. Ecological source areas are categorized by their ecological value and connectivity: primary sources represent high ecological value and strong connectivity, secondary sources have moderate ecological significance, and tertiary sources are of relatively lower priority but still vital for regional integrity. The results show a temporal trend of ecological risk declining between 2000 and 2010, followed by a moderate increase from 2010 to 2020. High-risk zones are concentrated in the central Tarim Basin, reflecting intensified land-use pressures and weak ecological resilience. The delineated ecological protection zones include 61,702.9 km 2 of primary, 146,802.5 km 2 of secondary, and 36,141.2 km 2 of tertiary ecological source areas. In total, 95 ecological corridors (23 primary, 37 secondaries, and 35 tertiary) were identified, along with 48 pinch points and 56 barrier points that require priority attention for ecological restoration. Valuable areas refer to those with high ecological connectivity and service provision potential, while vulnerable areas are characterized by high ecological risk and landscape fragmentation. This study provides a comprehensive framework for constructing ESPs in arid inland basins and offers practical insights for ecological planning in desert–oasis environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiyu He & Longhao Wang & Siqi Zhai & Yanlong Guo & Jie Huang, 2025. "Assessment of Landscape Risks and Ecological Security Patterns in the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1221-:d:1673104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1221-:d:1673104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.