IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1099-d1658641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Performance of Urban Sponge Parks Uncovered by an Integrated Evaluation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Peng

    (School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Shipeng Wen

    (School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

Abstract

Climate change and extreme rainfall events pose great pressures on a city’s resilience to flooding and waterlogging. Designed as a kind of green infrastructure to manage stormwater, urban sponge parks (USPs) in China have been demonstrated to have ecological and societal benefits, while their landscape economic values lack evaluation. Taking the real-estate choices surrounding six USPs in China as an example, an evaluation framework integrating text mining with housing introduction documents and hedonic price model (HPM) regression with housing prices was constructed to combine the stated preferences and revealed preferences of citizens when purchasing properties. The main findings include the following: (1) USPs do contribute to property appreciation, especially in newer urban areas, although they are not as strong as location and property characteristic factors; (2) the extent of the influence of USPs on houses decreases as the distance increases, with a maximum radius of 3 km; (3) a USP’s effects vary according to the urban and environmental context, as HPM with GWR (R 2 ranges from 0.203 to 0.679) outperforms the OLS method (R 2 ranges from 0.149 to 0.491), which evokes the need for more affluent and detailed analyses in the future. This study demonstrates the economic benefits of USPs and provides an evaluation approach based on citizen science data, which could contribute to the policy-making of USPs in China and promote the implementation of Nature-based Solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Peng & Shipeng Wen, 2025. "The Economic Performance of Urban Sponge Parks Uncovered by an Integrated Evaluation Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1099-:d:1658641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1099/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1099/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David E. Clark & William E. Herrin, 2000. "The Impact of Public School Attributes on Home Sale Prices in California," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 385-407.
    2. Jiaju Liu & Yujia Guo & Jingyi Han & Feng Yang & Nan Shen & Fei Sun & Yanjie Wei & Peng Yuan & Jiawei Wang, 2024. "Nature-Based Solutions for Landscape Performance Evaluation—Handan Garden Expo Park’s “Clear as a Drain” Artificial Wetland as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Peihao Tong & Hongxi Yin & Zhifang Wang & Ian Trivers, 2022. "Combining Stormwater Management and Park Services to Mitigate Climate Change and Improve Human Well-Being: A Case Study of Sponge City Parks in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Geoghegan, Jacqueline & Wainger, Lisa A. & Bockstael, Nancy E., 1997. "Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 251-264, December.
    5. Tyrvainen, Liisa & Miettinen, Antti, 2000. "Property Prices and Urban Forest Amenities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 205-223, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caruso, Geoffrey & Peeters, Dominique & Cavailhes, Jean & Rounsevell, Mark, 2007. "Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 542-567, September.
    2. Reeves, Tyler & Mei, Bin & Siry, Jacek & Bettinger, Pete & Ferreira, Susana, 2020. "Effect of working forest conservation easements on surrounding property values," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Özge Öner, 2017. "Retail city: the relationship between place attractiveness and accessibility to shops," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 72-91, January.
    4. Ready, Richard C. & Abdalla, Charles W., 2003. "The Amenity And Disamenity Impacts Of Agriculture: Estimates From A Hedonic Pricing Model In Southeastern Pennsylvania," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22196, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Altonji, Matthew & Lang, Corey & Puggioni, Gavino, 2016. "Can urban areas help sustain the preservation of open space? Evidence from statewide referenda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 82-91.
    6. Baranzini, Andrea & Schaerer, Caroline, 2011. "A sight for sore eyes: Assessing the value of view and land use in the housing market," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 191-199, September.
    7. Poudyal, Neelam C. & Hodges, Donald G. & Tonn, Bruce & Cho, Seong-Hoon, 2009. "Valuing diversity and spatial pattern of open space plots in urban neighborhoods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 194-201, May.
    8. Dekkers, J. & Koomen, E., 2008. "Valuation of open space: Hedonic house price analyses in the Dutch Randstad region," Serie Research Memoranda 0024, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    9. JunJie Wu & Richard M. Adams & Andrew J. Plantinga, 2004. "Amenities in an Urban Equilibrium Model: Residential Development in Portland, Oregon," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(1), pages 19-32.
    10. Fabian Waltert & Felix Schlaepfer, 2007. "The role of landscape amenities in regional development: a survey of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies," SOI - Working Papers 0710, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich.
    11. Elena G. Irwin, 2002. "The Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(4), pages 465-480.
    12. Jean Cavailhès & Pierre Frankhauser & Dominique Peeters & Isabelle Thomas, 2010. "Residential equilibrium in a multifractal metropolitan area," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(3), pages 681-704, December.
    13. Matthew Gnagey & Therese Grijalva, 2018. "The impact of trails on property values: a spatial analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(1), pages 73-97, January.
    14. Jean Cavailhès & Thierry Brossard & Jean-Christophe Foltête & Mohamed Hilal & Daniel Joly & François-Pierre Tourneux & Céline Tritz & Pierre Wavresky, 2009. "GIS-Based Hedonic Pricing of Landscape," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 44(4), pages 571-590, December.
    15. Thomas J. Nechyba & Randall P. Walsh, 2004. "Urban Sprawl," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 177-200, Fall.
    16. Pei-Ing Wu & Yi Chen & Je-Liang Liou, 2021. "Housing property along riverbanks in Taipei, Taiwan: a spatial quantile modelling of landscape benefits and flooding losses," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2404-2438, February.
    17. Eric Koomen & Jasper Dekkers & Mark Koetse & Piet Rietveld & Henk Scholten, 2005. "Valuation of metropolitan open space - presenting the research framework," ERSA conference papers ersa05p599, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Waltert, Fabian & Schläpfer, Felix, 2010. "Landscape amenities and local development: A review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 141-152, December.
    19. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2008. "Open Space and Urban Sprawl: The Case of the Maryland Forest Conservation Act," Working Papers 37812, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    20. H. Allen Klaiber & Joshua K. Abbott & V. Kerry Smith, 2017. "Some Like It (Less) Hot: Extracting Trade-Off Measures for Physically Coupled Amenities," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1053-1079.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1099-:d:1658641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.