IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p821-d1631699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Shaping Biodiversity in Urban Voids: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Cui

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia)

  • Ehsan Sharifi

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia)

  • Carlos Bartesaghi Koc

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
    Risk & Resilience Branch, Governance Division, Strategic Services & Advice, NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia)

  • Linna Yi

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia)

  • Scott Hawken

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia)

Abstract

Urban voids, such as vacant lots, brownfields, fallow land, wasteland, and the spaces between buildings, have the potential to serve as habitats for a diverse range of plants. However, their value for plant conservation remains understudied because of their informal and neglected nature. The aim of this systematic review is to consider the potential for urban voids to contribute to urban plant biodiversity. A total of 55 studies from 14 countries were analysed for geographical trends, factors influencing plant biodiversity, research methods, and relevant environmental parameters. The results of this study show that the factors influencing the plant diversity of urban voids can be divided into three main categories: biophysical, temporal, and landscape factors. Biophysical factors, such as size, age, soil, and vegetation structure, as well as temporal factors, including site management and human interventions, are the most important at the site-level scale. In contrast, landscape factors, such as the location and distance from other green spaces, are more dominant at the larger urban scale. The review has identified a significant limitation in the available literature, with relatively few studies examining the influence of urban voids’ shape, ownership, and microclimate on biodiversity. With respect to research methods, the results suggest a recent increase in the use of GIS-based and remote sensing techniques to investigate the plant diversity of urban voids. The findings discussed in this paper indicate the need for further research to comprehensively understand the factors that promote urban vegetation diversity in urban voids.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Cui & Ehsan Sharifi & Carlos Bartesaghi Koc & Linna Yi & Scott Hawken, 2025. "Factors Shaping Biodiversity in Urban Voids: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:821-:d:1631699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/821/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/821/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine C. Rega-Brodsky & Charles H. Nilon & Paige S. Warren, 2018. "Balancing Urban Biodiversity Needs and Resident Preferences for Vacant Lot Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Ray M. Northam, 1971. "Vacant Urban Land in the American City," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 47(4), pages 345-355.
    3. Shanshan Feng & Wei Hou & Jiang Chang, 2019. "Changing Coal Mining Brownfields into Green Infrastructure Based on Ecological Potential Assessment in Xuzhou, Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Gil M Doron, 2000. "The Dead Zone and the Architecture of Transgression," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 247-263.
    5. Maria Ignatieva & Diana Dushkova & Daniel Jan Martin & Fahimeh Mofrad & Katherine Stewart & Michael Hughes, 2023. "From One to Many Natures: Integrating Divergent Urban Nature Visions to Support Nature-Based Solutions in Australia and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Lucia Ludovici & Maria Chiara Pastore, 2024. "Informal Urban Biodiversity in the Milan Metropolitan Area: The Role of Spontaneous Nature in the Leftover Regeneration Process," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Christopher B. Riley & Kayla I. Perry & Kerry Ard & Mary M. Gardiner, 2018. "Asset or Liability? Ecological and Sociological Tradeoffs of Urban Spontaneous Vegetation on Vacant Land in Shrinking Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Ingo Kowarik & Anne Hiller & Greg Planchuelo & Birgit Seitz & Moritz von der Lippe & Sascha Buchholz, 2019. "Emerging Urban Forests: Opportunities for Promoting the Wild Side of the Urban Green Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trentanovi, Giovanni & Campagnaro, Thomas & Kowarik, Ingo & Munafò, Michele & Semenzato, Paolo & Sitzia, Tommaso, 2021. "Integrating spontaneous urban woodlands into the green infrastructure: Unexploited opportunities for urban regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Katia Talento & Miguel Amado & Josè Carlos Kullberg, 2019. "Landscape—A Review with a European Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, May.
    3. Park, Mi Sun & Shin, Seongmin & Lee, Haeun, 2021. "Media frames on urban greening in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Felipe Morandé & Alexandra Petermann & Miguel Vargas, 2010. "Determinants of Urban Vacant Land," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 188-202, February.
    5. GLUMAC Brano & HERRERA-GOMEZ Marcos & LICHERON Julien, 2018. "A residential land price index for Luxembourg: Dealing with the spatial dimension," LISER Working Paper Series 2018-07, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    6. Zhang, Wei & Li, Yuqing & Zheng, Caigui, 2023. "The distribution characteristics and driving mechanism of vacant land in Chengdu, China: A perspective of urban shrinkage and expansion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    7. Martin J. Murray, 2021. "Ruination and Rejuvenation: Rethinking Growth and Decline through an Inverted Telescope," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 348-362, March.
    8. Fábio Suzart de Albuquerque & Heather L. Bateman & Cameron Boehme & Daniel C. Allen & Luis Cayuela, 2021. "Variation in Temperature, Precipitation, and Vegetation Greenness Drive Changes in Seasonal Variation of Avian Diversity in an Urban Desert Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Glumac, Brano & Herrera-Gomez, Marcos & Licheron, Julien, 2019. "A hedonic urban land price index," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 802-812.
    10. Ioan Sebastian Jucu & Sorina Voiculescu, 2020. "Abandoned Places and Urban Marginalized Sites in Lugoj Municipality, Three Decades after Romania’s State-Socialist Collapse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Liu Yang & Koen H. van Dam & Lufeng Zhang, 2020. "Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-34, November.
    12. Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu & Weng, Jia-Hsi, 2019. "How does energy consumption affect China's urbanization? New evidence from dynamic threshold panel models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 24-38.
    13. Zhiyuan Xiang & Meifang Zhao & U. S. Ogbodo, 2020. "Accumulation of Urban Insect Pests in China: 50 Years’ Observations on Camphor Tree ( Cinnamomum camphora )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Ingo Kowarik & Leonie K. Fischer & Dave Kendal, 2020. "Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, June.
    16. Ingo Kowarik & Anne Hiller & Greg Planchuelo & Birgit Seitz & Moritz von der Lippe & Sascha Buchholz, 2019. "Emerging Urban Forests: Opportunities for Promoting the Wild Side of the Urban Green Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Maria Bostenaru Dan & Magdalena Maria Bostenaru-Dan, 2021. "Greening the Brownfields of Thermal Power Plants in Rural Areas, an Example from Romania, Set in the Context of Developments in the Industrialized Country of Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Maria Ignatieva & Fahimeh Mofrad, 2023. "Understanding Urban Green Spaces Typology’s Contribution to Comprehensive Green Infrastructure Planning: A Study of Canberra, the National Capital of Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Alberto Vanolo, 2013. "Alternative Capitalism and Creative Economy: the Case of Christiania," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1785-1798, September.
    20. Lee, Ryun Jung & Newman, Galen, 2021. "The relationship between vacant properties and neighborhood gentrification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:821-:d:1631699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.